O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 48-4-60 (2019)

Definitions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in this article, the term:

(1) “Agreement” means:

(A) An interlocal cooperation agreement entered into by the parties pursuant to this article; or

(B) A resolution of a consolidated government establishing an authority pursuant to this article.

(2) “Authority” means the land bank authority established pursuant to this article.

(3) “Parties” means the parties to the agreement, which shall include one or more cities and the county containing such cities, or a consolidated government which has adopted a resolution establishing an authority.

(4) “Property” means real property, including any improvements thereon.

(5) “Tax delinquent property” means any property on which the taxes levied and assessed by any party remain in whole or in part unpaid on the date due and payable.

History

Code 1981, § 48-4-60, enacted by Ga. L.

1990, p. 1875, § 3; Ga. L. 1996, p. 824, § 1; Ga. L. 1997, p. 882, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2013 · leading case: Tribeca Homes, LLC v. Marathon Inv. Corp., 745 S.E.2d 806 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tribeca Homes, LLC v. Marathon Inv. Corp., 745 S.E.2d 806 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “See generally OCGA §§ 48-4-60 et seq.; 48-4-100 et seq.”
Tribeca Homes, LLC v. Marathon Inv. Corp. (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “In 2006, Jason Strickland formed Tribeca Homes in order to build low- to moderate-income housing primarily in the City of Atlanta to address the need for such housing near the City.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.