Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 48-5-2 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 48 REVENUE AND TAXATION

Section 5. Ad Valorem Taxation of Property, 48-5-1 through 48-5-607.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

48-5-2. (For effective date, see note.) Definitions.

As used in this chapter, the term:

(.1) "Arm's length, bona fide sale" means a transaction which has occurred in good faith without fraud or deceit carried out by unrelated or unaffiliated parties, as by a willing buyer and a willing seller, each acting in his or her own self-interest, including but not limited to a distress sale, short sale, bank sale, or sale at public auction.

  1. "Current use value" of bona fide conservation use property means the amount a knowledgeable buyer would pay for the property with the intention of continuing the property in its existing use and in an arm's length, bona fide sale and shall be determined in accordance with the specifications and criteria provided for in subsection (b) of Code Section 48-5-269.
  2. "Current use value" of bona fide residential transitional property means the amount a knowledgeable buyer would pay for the property with the intention of continuing the property in its existing use and in an arm's length, bona fide sale.The tax assessor shall consider the following criteria, as applicable, in determining the current use value of bona fide residential transitional property:
    1. The current use of such property;
    2. Annual productivity; and
    3. Sales data of comparable real property with and for the same existing use.
  3. "Fair market value of property" means the amount a knowledgeable buyer would pay for the property and a willing seller would accept for the property at an arm's length, bona fide sale. The income approach, if data are available, shall be utilized in determining the fair market value of income-producing property, and, if actual income and expense data are voluntarily supplied by the property owner, such data shall be considered in such determination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter to the contrary, the transaction amount of the most recent arm's length, bona fide sale in any year shall be the maximum allowable fair market value for the next taxable year. With respect to the valuation of equipment, machinery, and fixtures when no ready market exists for the sale of the equipment, machinery, and fixtures, fair market value may be determined by resorting to any reasonable, relevant, and useful information available, including, but not limited to, the original cost of the property, any depreciation or obsolescence, and any increase in value by reason of inflation.Each tax assessor shall have access to any public records of the taxpayer for the purpose of discovering such information.
    1. In determining the fair market value of a going business where its continued operation is reasonably anticipated, the tax assessor may value the equipment, machinery, and fixtures which are the property of the business as a whole where appropriate to reflect the accurate fair market value.
    2. The tax assessor shall apply the following criteria in determining the fair market value of real property:
      1. Existing zoning of property;
      2. Existing use of property, including any restrictions or limitations on the use of property resulting from state or federal law or rules or regulations adopted pursuant to the authority of state or federal law;
      3. Existing covenants or restrictions in deed dedicating the property to a particular use;
      4. Bank sales, other financial institution owned sales, or distressed sales, or any combination thereof, of comparable real property;
      5. Decreased value of the property based on limitations and restrictions resulting from the property being in a conservation easement;
      6. Rent limitations, higher operating costs resulting from regulatory requirements imposed on the property, and any other restrictions imposed upon the property in connection with the property being eligible for any income tax credits with respect to real property which are claimed and granted pursuant to either Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or Chapter 7 of this title or receiving any other state or federal subsidies provided with respect to the use of the property as residential rental property; provided, however, that properties described in this division shall not be considered comparable real property for the assessment or appeal of assessment of properties not covered by this division;
      7. (I) In establishing the value of any property subject to rent restrictions under the sales comparison approach, any income tax credits described in division (vi) of this subparagraph that are attributable to a property may be considered in determining the fair market value of the property, provided that the tax assessor uses comparable sales of property which, at the time of the comparable sale, had unused income tax credits that were transferred in an arm's length, bona fide sale.
    3. In establishing the value of any property subject to rent restrictions under the income approach, any income tax credits described in division (vi) of this subparagraph that are attributable to property may be considered in determining the fair market value of the property, provided that such income tax credits generate actual income to the record holder of title to the property; and
      1. Any other existing factors provided by law or by rule and regulation of the commissioner deemed pertinent in arriving at fair market value.

      (B.1) The tax assessor shall not consider any income tax credits with respect to real property which are claimed and granted pursuant to either Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or Chapter 7 of this title in determining the fair market value of real property.

      (B.2) In determining the fair market value of real property, the tax assessor shall not include the value of any intangible assets used by a business, wherever located, including patents, trademarks, trade names, customer agreements, and merchandising agreements.

    4. Fair market value of "rehabilitated historic property" as such term is defined in subsection (a) of Code Section 48-5-7.2 means:
      1. For the first eight years in which the property is classified as "rehabilitated historic property," the value equal to the greater of the acquisition cost of the property or the appraised fair market value of the property as recorded in the county tax digest at the time preliminary certification on such property was received by the county board of tax assessors pursuant to subsection (c) of Code Section 48-5-7.2;
      2. For the ninth year in which the property is classified as "rehabilitated historic property," the value of the property as determined by division (i) of this subparagraph plus one-half of the difference between such value and the current fair market value exclusive of the provisions of this subparagraph; and
      3. For the tenth and following years, the fair market value of such property as determined by the provisions of this paragraph, excluding the provisions of this subparagraph.
    5. Fair market value of "landmark historic property" as such term is defined in subsection (a) of Code Section 48-5-7.3 means:
      1. For the first eight years in which the property is classified as "landmark historic property," the value equal to the greater of the acquisition cost of the property or the appraised fair market value of the property as recorded in the county tax digest at the time certification on such property was received by the county board of tax assessors pursuant to subsection (c) of Code Section 48-5-7.3;
      2. For the ninth year in which the property is classified as "landmark historic property," the value of the property as determined by division (i) of this subparagraph plus one-half of the difference between such value and the current fair market value exclusive of the provisions of this subparagraph; and
      3. For the tenth and following years, the fair market value of such property as determined by the provisions of this paragraph, excluding the provisions of this subparagraph.
    6. Timber shall be valued at its fair market value at the time of its harvest or sale in the manner specified in Code Section 48-5-7.5.
    7. Fair market value of "brownfield property" as such term is defined in subsection (a) of Code Section 48-5-7.6 means:
      1. Unless sooner disqualified pursuant to subsection (e) of Code Section 48-5-7.6, for the first ten years in which the property is classified as brownfield property, or as this period of preferential assessment may be extended pursuant to subsection (o) of Code Section 48-5-7.6, the value equal to the lesser of the acquisition cost of the property or the appraised fair market value of the property as recorded in the county tax digest at the time application was made to the Environmental Protection Division of the Department of Natural Resources for participation under Article 9 of Chapter 8 of Title 12, the "Georgia Brownfield Act," as amended; and
      2. Unless sooner disqualified pursuant to subsection (e) of Code Section 48-5-7.6, for the eleventh and following years, or at the end of any extension of this period of preferential assessment pursuant to subsection (o) of Code Section 48-5-7.6, the fair market value of such property as determined by the provisions of this paragraph, excluding the provisions of this subparagraph.
  4. "Foreign merchandise in transit" means personal property of any description which has been or will be moved by waterborne commerce through any port located in this state and:
    1. Which has entered the export stream, although temporarily stored or warehoused in the county where the port of export is located; or
    2. Which was shipped from a point of origin located outside the customs territory of the United States and on which United States customs duties are paid at or through any customs district or port located in this state, although stored or warehoused in the county where the port of entry is located while in transit to a final destination.
  5. "Forest land conservation value" of forest land conservation use property means the amount determined in accordance with the specifications and criteria provided for in Code Section 48-5-271 and Article VII, Section I, Paragraph III(f) of the Constitution.
  6. "Forest land fair market value" means the 2008 fair market value of the forest land; provided, however, that when the 2008 fair market value of the forest land has been appealed by a property owner and the ultimate fair market value of the forest land is changed in the appeal process by either the board of assessors, the board of equalization, a hearing officer, an arbitrator, or a superior court judge, then the final fair market value of the forest land shall replace the 2008 fair market value of the forest land. This final fair market value of the forest land shall be used in the calculation of local assistance grants. If local assistance grants have been granted to either a county, a county board of education, or a municipality based on the 2008 fair market value of forest land and subsequently the fair market value of such forest land is reduced on an appeal, then the county or the municipality shall reimburse the state, within 12 months unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, the difference between local assistance grants paid to the county or municipality and the amount which would have been due based on the final fair market value of the forest land. Such 2008 valuation may increase from one taxable year to the next by a rate equal to the percentage change in the price index for gross output of state and local government from the prior year to the current year as defined by the National Income and Product Accounts and determined by the United States Bureau of Economic Analysis and indicated by the Price Index for Government Consumption Expenditures and General Government Gross Output (Table 3.10.4).

(Ga. L. 1909, p. 36, § 22; Civil Code 1910, § 1004; Code 1933, § 92-5702; Ga. L. 1968, p. 358, § 1; Ga. L. 1969, p. 980, § 2; Ga. L. 1975, p. 96, § 1; Ga. L. 1978, p. 1950, § 1; Code 1933, § 91A-1001, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 309, § 2; Ga. L. 1979, p. 5, § 17; Ga. L. 1983, p. 716, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 1585, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 1122, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 1869, § 1; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1903, § 2; Ga. L. 1992, p. 1008, § 1; Ga. L. 2001, p. 1098, § 1; Ga. L. 2003, p. 170, § 1; Ga. L. 2008, p. 297, § 1/HB 1211; Ga. L. 2009, p. 27, § 1/SB 55; Ga. L. 2010, p. 1104, §§ 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4/SB 346; Ga. L. 2012, p. 843, § 3/HB 1102; Ga. L. 2014, p. 672, § 1/HB 755; Ga. L. 2014, p. 820, § 1/HB 954; Ga. L. 2017, p. 55, § 1/HB 196; Ga. L. 2017, p. 774, § 48/HB 323; Ga. L. 2018, p. 119, §§ 1, 2/HB 85; Ga. L. 2018, p. 1112, § 48/SB 365.)

Delayed effective date.

- Ga. L. 2018, p. 119, § 7/HB 85, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "(a) This Act shall become effective on January 1, 2019, only if an amendment to the Constitution of Georgia is ratified at the November, 2018, general election modifying constitutional prescriptions for forest land conservation use property and related assistance grants, permitting the withholding of a portion of assistance grants to provide for certain state administrative costs, and establishing qualified timberland property as a subclassification of tangible property for purposes of ad valorem taxation.

"(b) If such an amendment to the Constitution is not so ratified, then this Act shall not become effective and shall stand repealed by operation of law on January 1, 2019." This Code section, as set out above, does not reflect the amendment by that Act owing to the delayed effective date. If the amendment to the Constitution is ratified, this Code section will read as follows:

"As used in this chapter, the term:

"(.1) 'Arm's length, bona fide sale' means a transaction which has occurred in good faith without fraud or deceit carried out by unrelated or unaffiliated parties, as by a willing buyer and a willing seller, each acting in his or her own self-interest, including but not limited to a distress sale, short sale, bank sale, or sale at public auction.

"(1) 'Current use value' of bona fide conservation use property means the amount a knowledgeable buyer would pay for the property with the intention of continuing the property in its existing use and in an arm's length, bona fide sale and shall be determined in accordance with the specifications and criteria provided for in subsection (b) of Code Section 48-5-269.

"(2) 'Current use value' of bona fide residential transitional property means the amount a knowledgeable buyer would pay for the property with the intention of continuing the property in its existing use and in an arm's length, bona fide sale. The tax assessor shall consider the following criteria, as applicable, in determining the current use value of bona fide residential transitional property:

"(A) The current use of such property;

"(B) Annual productivity; and

"(C) Sales data of comparable real property with and for the same existing use.

"(3) 'Fair market value of property' means the amount a knowledgeable buyer would pay for the property and a willing seller would accept for the property at an arm's length, bona fide sale. The income approach, if data are available, shall be utilized in determining the fair market value of income-producing property, and, if actual income and expense data are voluntarily supplied by the property owner, such data shall be considered in such determination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter to the contrary, the transaction amount of the most recent arm's length, bona fide sale in any year shall be the maximum allowable fair market value for the next taxable year. With respect to the valuation of equipment, machinery, and fixtures when no ready market exists for the sale of the equipment, machinery, and fixtures, fair market value may be determined by resorting to any reasonable, relevant, and useful information available, including, but not limited to, the original cost of the property, any depreciation or obsolescence, and any increase in value by reason of inflation. Each tax assessor shall have access to any public records of the taxpayer for the purpose of discovering such information.

"(A) In determining the fair market value of a going business where its continued operation is reasonably anticipated, the tax assessor may value the equipment, machinery, and fixtures which are the property of the business as a whole where appropriate to reflect the accurate fair market value.

"(B) The tax assessor shall apply the following criteria in determining the fair market value of real property:

"(i) Existing zoning of property;

"(ii) Existing use of property, including any restrictions or limitations on the use of property resulting from state or federal law or rules or regulations adopted pursuant to the authority of state or federal law;

"(iii) Existing covenants or restrictions in deed dedicating the property to a particular use;

"(iv) Bank sales, other financial institution owned sales, or distressed sales, or any combination thereof, of comparable real property;

"(v) Decreased value of the property based on limitations and restrictions resulting from the property being in a conservation easement;

"(vi) Rent limitations, higher operating costs resulting from regulatory requirements imposed on the property, and any other restrictions imposed upon the property in connection with the property being eligible for any income tax credits with respect to real property which are claimed and granted pursuant to either Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or Chapter 7 of this title or receiving any other state or federal subsidies provided with respect to the use of the property as residential rental property; provided, however, that properties described in this division shall not be considered comparable real property for the assessment or appeal of assessment of properties not covered by this division;

"(vii)(I) In establishing the value of any property subject to rent restrictions under the sales comparison approach, any income tax credits described in division (vi) of this subparagraph that are attributable to a property may be considered in determining the fair market value of the property, provided that the tax assessor uses comparable sales of property which, at the time of the comparable sale, had unused income tax credits that were transferred in an arm's length, bona fide sale.

"(II) In establishing the value of any property subject to rent restrictions under the income approach, any income tax credits described in division (vi) of this subparagraph that are attributable to property may be considered in determining the fair market value of the property, provided that such income tax credits generate actual income to the record holder of title to the property; and

"(viii) Any other existing factors provided by law or by rule and regulation of the commissioner deemed pertinent in arriving at fair market value.

"(B.1) The tax assessor shall not consider any income tax credits with respect to real property which are claimed and granted pursuant to either Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or Chapter 7 of this title in determining the fair market value of real property.

"(B.2) In determining the fair market value of real property, the tax assessor shall not include the value of any intangible assets used by a business, wherever located, including patents, trademarks, trade names, customer agreements, and merchandising agreements.

"(C) Fair market value of 'historic property' as such term is defined in subsection (a) of Code Section 48-5-7.2 means:

"(i) For the first eight years in which the property is classified as 'rehabilitated historic property,' the value equal to the greater of the acquisition cost of the property or the appraised fair market value of the property as recorded in the county tax digest at the time preliminary certification on such property was received by the county board of tax assessors pursuant to subsection (c) of Code Section 48-5-7.2;

"(ii) For the ninth year in which the property is classified as 'rehabilitated historic property,' the value of the property as determined by division (i) of this subparagraph plus one-half of the difference between such value and the current fair market value exclusive of the provisions of this subparagraph; and

"(iii) For the tenth and following years, the fair market value of such property as determined by the provisions of this paragraph, excluding the provisions of this subparagraph.

"(D) Fair market value of 'landmark historic property' as such term is defined in subsection (a) of Code Section 48-5-7.3 means:

"(i) For the first eight years in which the property is classified as 'landmark historic property,' the value equal to the greater of the acquisition cost of the property or the appraised fair market value of the property as recorded in the county tax digest at the time certification on such property was received by the county board of tax assessors pursuant to subsection (c) of Code Section 48-5-7.3;

"(ii) For the ninth year in which the property is classified as 'landmark historic property,' the value of the property as determined by division (i) of this subparagraph plus one-half of the difference between such value and the current fair market value exclusive of the provisions of this subparagraph; and

"(iii) For the tenth and following years, the fair market value of such property as determined by the provisions of this paragraph, excluding the provisions of this subparagraph.

"(E) Timber shall be valued at its fair market value at the time of its harvest or sale in the manner specified in Code Section 48-5-7.5.

"(F) Fair market value of 'brownfield property' as such term is defined in subsection (a) of Code Section 48-5-7.6 means:

"(i) Unless sooner disqualified pursuant to subsection (e) of Code Section 48-5-7.6, for the first ten years in which the property is classified as brownfield property, or as this period of preferential assessment may be extended pursuant to subsection (o) of Code Section 48-5-7.6, the value equal to the lesser of the acquisition cost of the property or the appraised fair market value of the property as recorded in the county tax digest at the time application was made to the Environmental Protection Division of the Department of Natural Resources for participation under Article 9 of Chapter 8 of Title 12, the 'Georgia Brownfield Act,' as amended; and

"(ii) Unless sooner disqualified pursuant to subsection (e) of Code Section 48-5-7.6, for the eleventh and following years, or at the end of any extension of this period of preferential assessment pursuant to subsection (o) of Code Section 48-5-7.6, the fair market value of such property as determined by the provisions of this paragraph, excluding the provisions of this subparagraph.

"(G) Fair market value of 'qualified timberland property' means the fair market value determined in accordance with Article 13 of this chapter.

"(4) 'Foreign merchandise in transit' means personal property of any description which has been or will be moved by waterborne commerce through any port located in this state and:

"(A) Which has entered the export stream, although temporarily stored or warehoused in the county where the port of export is located; or

"(B) Which was shipped from a point of origin located outside the customs territory of the United States and on which United States customs duties are paid at or through any customs district or port located in this state, although stored or warehoused in the county where the port of entry is located while in transit to a final destination.

"(5) 'Forest land conservation use value' of forest land conservation use property means the amount determined in accordance with the specifications and criteria provided for in Code Section 48 5 271 and Article VII, Section I, Paragraph III(f) of the Constitution.

"(6) 'Forest land fair market value' means the fair market value of the forest land determined in accordance with Article VII, Section I, Paragraph III(f) of the Constitution."

The 2017 amendments. The first 2017 amendment, effective July 1, 2017, in the second sentence of paragraph (3), substituted "utilized" for "considered" near the middle and inserted ", and, if actual income and expense data are voluntarily supplied by the property owner, such data shall be considered in such determination" at the end; rewrote division (3)(B)(vi); added division (3)(B)(vii); and redesignated former division (3)(B)(vii) as present division (3)(B)(viii). The second 2017 amendment, effective May 9, 2017, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, revised language in paragraph (3), and, in division (3)(F)(i), revised punctuation and substituted "'Georgia Brownfield Act'" for "'Georgia Hazardous Site Reuse and Redevelopment Act'".

The 2018 amendments. The first 2018 amendment added subparagraph (3)(G), inserted "use" following "'Forestland conservation"' in paragraph (5), and rewrote paragraph (6). For effective date of this amendment, see the delayed effective date note. The second 2018 amendment, effective May 8, 2018, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, revised punctuation in subdivisions (3)(B)(vii)(I) and (3)(B)(vii)(II).

Code Commission notes.

- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2010, a misspelling of "occurred" was corrected in paragraph (.1).

Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2018, "rehabilitated" was inserted before "historic property" in subparagraph (4)(C).

Editor's notes.

- Ga. L. 1991, p. 1903, § 15, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment to this Code section shall be applicable beginning January 1, 1992, with respect to ad valorem taxation of timber and shall be applicable beginning January 1, 1992, for all other purposes. Taxation for prior periods shall continue to be governed by prior law.

Ga. L. 2008, p. 297, § 5/HB 1211, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the 2008 amendment becomes effective on January 1, 2009, upon the ratification of a resolution at the November 2008, state-wide general election, which resolution amends the Constitution so as to provide for the special assessment and taxation of forest land conservation use property and for local government assistance grants. The constitutional amendment (Ga. L. 2008, p. 1209) was ratified at the general election held on November 4, 2008.

Ga. L. 2009, p. 27, § 5/SB 55, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that the amendment to this Code section shall be applicable to all taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009.

Ga. L. 2017, p. 55, § 1/HB 196, which amended this Code section, purported to amend paragraph (3) but no changes were made to subparagraphs (B.1), (B.2), and (C) through (F).

Law reviews.

- For article discussing tax exemptions and deductions as incentives for establishment of foreign business in Georgia, see 27 Mercer L. Rev. 629 (1976). For article, "The Tax Abatement Program for Historic Properties in Georgia," see 28 Ga. St. B. J. 129 (1992). For annual survey on law of real property, see 43 Mercer L. Rev. 353 (1991). For annual survey on real property law, see 61 Mercer L. Rev. 301 (2009). For annual survey on real property, see 66 Mercer L. Rev. 151 (2014). For survey article on local government law, see 67 Mercer L. Rev. 147 (2015). For survey article on real property law, see 67 Mercer L. Rev. 193 (2015). For annual survey on local government law, see 68 Mercer L. Rev. 199 (2016). For annual survey of real property law, see 68 Mercer L. Rev. 231 (2016). For annual survey on local government law, see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 205 (2017). For note on the 1989 amendment to this Code section, see 6 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 173 (1989).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

General Consideration

Constitutionality of utilizing other methods for determining fair market value.

- Utilization of different methods for determining fair market value for purposes of taxation creates no infirmity under the United States Constitution or under the state constitution or laws. Dougherty County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Burt Realty Co., 250 Ga. 467, 298 S.E.2d 475, cert. denied, 463 U.S. 1208, 103 S. Ct. 3540, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1390 (1983).

Statute is not unconstitutional for vagueness of the term "fair market value of property." Chilivis v. Backus, 236 Ga. 88, 222 S.E.2d 371 (1976).

Section runs afoul of taxation uniformity provision of constitution.

- Inasmuch as O.C.G.A. § 48-5-2(3)(B.1) exempted the low-income housing tax credits from consideration in determining the fair market value of the properties, the statute granted preferential treatment for ad valorem taxation purposes and created a subclass of tangible property other than as permitted by the State Constitution, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VII, Sec. I, Para. III (b), which ran afoul of the taxation uniformity provision. Heron Lake II Apts., L. P. v. Lowndes County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 299 Ga. 598, 791 S.E.2d 77 (2016).

Definition of "fair market value of property" is not too vague and indefinite to be enforced. Chilivis v. Kell, 236 Ga. 226, 223 S.E.2d 117, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 891, 97 S. Ct. 249, 50 L. Ed. 2d 174 (1976).

Constitutionality of the term "fair market value of property."

- Term "fair market value of property" as defined in this statute is not too vague and indefinite to be enforced, and there is no merit in the constitutional attacks on county ad valorem tax assessments statutes because of their use of this term. Butts County v. Briscoe, 236 Ga. 233, 223 S.E.2d 199 (1976).

Fair market value.

- Because "fair market value of property" was not defined as the amount a buyer would pay to purchase, and a willing seller would accept, for a defeasable interest in property; the appellate court concluded the tax sale did not qualify as an arm's length, bona fide sale such that the one-year freeze applied and, thus, the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment to the Newton County Board of Tax Assessors, and in denying the buyers' cross-motion on that ground. Ballard v. Newton County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 332 Ga. App. 521, 773 S.E.2d 780 (2015).

Highest and best use may be considered.

- In assessing the fair market value of real property, tax assessors may, when appropriate, consider the "highest and best use" of real property under the statutory criterion allowing "[A]ny other factors deemed pertinent in arriving at a fair market value." Sibley v. Cobb County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 171 Ga. App. 65, 318 S.E.2d 643 (1984).

Applicability of 1979 amendment.

- Change made by Ga. L. 1979, p. 5, § 17, is not to the tax year 1979 but to tax years 1980 and thereafter. Monroe County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Remick, 165 Ga. App. 616, 300 S.E.2d 203 (1983).

Simultaneous application of local Act homestead exemption was not precluded.

- Although an owner's property qualified for preferential assessment under the Rehabilitated Historic Property Preferential Assessment Act (RHPPA), O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.2, the owner was allowed to use the effective date of the local Act homestead exemption, Ga. L. 1999, p. 4213, § 1, as the base year for the fair market valuation assessment of the property because the simultaneous application of the RHPPA and the local Act homestead exemption was not precluded. Chatham County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Bock, 299 Ga. App. 257, 682 S.E.2d 355 (2009).

"Foreign merchandise in transit."

- Imported stone tile/slab, which was stored at the taxpayer's pleasure for sale to anyone who might wish to purchase it, was not "in transit to a final destination" within the contemplation of subparagraph (4)(B) of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-2 and was consequently not exempt from ad valorem taxation under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-5. Seabrook Corp. v. Chatham County Bd. of Equalization, 195 Ga. App. 730, 394 S.E.2d 796 (1990).

Merchandise brought into the United States through the port of Charleston, South Carolina and transported, via land freight carrier to a container freight station in Chatham County, was not "foreign merchandise in transit" and was therefore not exempt from ad valorem taxation. Pier 1 Imports v. Chatham County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 199 Ga. App. 294, 404 S.E.2d 637 (1991).

Construction of O.C.G.A.

§ 48-5-2(3) with local constitutional amendment. - Trial court properly determined that no conflict existed between a local constitutional amendment (LCA) and O.C.G.A. § 48-5-2(3) because the statute focused on the market-determined value of property on the actual date the property was acquired, rather than the property's value as much as a year later and was entirely consistent with the LCA, which froze the ad valorem tax value of homestead property in the county at the property's fair market value at the start of the year after a homestead exemption was allowed or after ownership of the property changed. Columbus Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Yeoman, 293 Ga. 107, 744 S.E.2d 18 (2013).

Trial court is correct in disregarding valuation placed on property by board of tax assessors when the chairperson concedes that the chairperson has no knowledge of the existing use of the property, that the existing zoning is not indicative of any use to which the property might reasonably be put, and that the chairperson knows of no other factors, other than the property's general location, which might be pertinent in determining the amount the property would bring at a cash sale. Evans v. Board of Tax Assessors, 168 Ga. App. 792, 310 S.E.2d 562 (1983).

No distinction between property owned by public utility corporations and individuals. Ogletree v. Woodward, 150 Ga. 691, 105 S.E. 243 (1920).

Duty to return all property at fair market value is a statutory mandate.

- Provision requiring that all property be returned for taxation at the property's fair market value is, undeniably, a statutory mandate. McLennan v. Undercofler, 222 Ga. 302, 149 S.E.2d 705 (1966).

Duty to return all property at fair market value is not supreme, but yields to the duty to avoid discrimination. McLennan v. Undercofler, 222 Ga. 302, 149 S.E.2d 705 (1966); Griggs v. Greene, 230 Ga. 257, 197 S.E.2d 116 (1973).

Construction of "existing use of property."

- Term "existing use of property" as used in the definition of "fair market value of property" cannot be assigned any particular value since real property is unique and the extent to which existing use affects the property's value is dependent upon a great variety of other factors. Cobb County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Sibley, 244 Ga. 404, 260 S.E.2d 313 (1979).

Construction with other law.

- Assessments lacked uniformity in failing to follow the mandates of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-2 regarding consideration of "existing use of the property" and "other factors deemed pertinent in arriving at fair market value" and in failing to exempt standing timber under the mandate of O.C.G.A. §§ 48-5-7.1(a)(1) and48-5-7.5 as set forth in Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VII, Sec. I, Para. III. Leverett v. Jasper County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 233 Ga. App. 470, 504 S.E.2d 559 (1998).

"Bona fide sale" included sale by Freddie Mac at a loss.

- Trial court erred in concluding that a 2011 sale of taxable property by Freddie Mac did not qualify as an arm's length, bona fide sale for purposes of limiting the assessment value of the property in the next year under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-2(3); O.C.G.A. § 48-5-2(.1) expressly defined a bona fide sale to include distress transactions. CPF Invs., LLLP v. Fulton County Bd. of Assessors, 330 Ga. App. 744, 769 S.E.2d 159 (2015).

Arm's length bona fide sale occurred at sheriff's sale.

- Trial court erred by determining that the sheriff's sale of certain real property was not an arm's length, bona fide sale under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-2(3) because the sheriff's sale of the subject property was a distress sale and public auction; thus, it was an arm's length, bona fide sale under the plain terms of § 48-5-2(.1). Park Solutions, LLC v. DeKalb County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 336 Ga. App. 832, 783 S.E.2d 453 (2016).

Discrepancies in tax evaluation assessment.

- Bankruptcy court found that for the purposes of ad valorem tax on the debtors' equipment that: (1) for 1997, the value was the lowest of the tax assessors' value due to discrepancies in the tax assessors' values; (2) for 1998, the court accepted the value determined by the board of equalization which gave some weight to the debtors' appraiser who considered comparable sales; (3) for 1999, the court took the tax assessors' lowest value as the debtors' appraiser omitted a laser device; and (4) for 2000, the debtors did not challenge the tax assessors' value. In re R-P Packaging, Inc., 278 Bankr. 281 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 2002).

Cited in Williamson v. DeKalb County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 168 Ga. App. 47, 308 S.E.2d 55 (1983); Hawkins v. Grady County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 180 Ga. App. 834, 350 S.E.2d 790 (1986); Hawkins v. Grady County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 192 Ga. App. 416, 385 S.E.2d 305 (1989); Coleman v. Montgomery County, 228 Ga. App. 276, 491 S.E.2d 495 (1997); Jones v. Chatham County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 270 Ga. App. 483, 606 S.E.2d 673 (2004).

Factors to Be Considered

Existing use of property is not exclusive factor in determining fair market value; assessors are directed to consider also existing zoning of property, existing covenants or restrictions in the deed dedicating the property to a particular use, or any other factors deemed pertinent in arriving at a fair market value. Cobb County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Sibley, 244 Ga. 404, 260 S.E.2d 313 (1979).

Existing use must be employed as a yardstick with which to measure fair market value. Inland Container Corp. v. Paulding County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 220 Ga. App. 878, 470 S.E.2d 702 (1996), overruled on other grounds by Gilmer County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Spence, 309 Ga. App. 482, 711 S.E.2d 51(2011).

Sufficiency of evidence that assessors failed to consider existing use of property in valuation.

- Evidence is sufficient to support the judgment of the trial court that assessors failed to consider the existing use of land which is generally categorized as vacant land, not commercial, industrial, or residential subdivision, when assessors, relying on the property's highest and best use, assigned such land a base value according to the district in which the land was located, which value was determined by the sale price of other vacant lands purchased for development, which sales did not accurately reflect the value of other vacant land because such sales were often for special purposes such as schools or parks, or speculative development. Cobb County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Sibley, 244 Ga. 404, 260 S.E.2d 313 (1979).

"Other pertinent factors" should be considered only after factors listed in section.

- It is error for a court to approve a valuation which tilts market value in favor of an assumed highest and best use to appear from future speculation and development, rather than first determining the criteria for zoning, existing use, and deed restrictions, if any, at which time other pertinent factors may be considered. Dotson v. Henry County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 155 Ga. App. 557, 271 S.E.2d 691 (1980); Dotson v. Henry County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 161 Ga. App. 257, 287 S.E.2d 696 (1982).

Intent as to use of "highest and best use" as factor in valuation.

- While under the criterion "any other factors deemed pertinent" the highest and best use may be considered, the General Assembly did not base market value on highest and best use, nor did the General Assembly list highest and best use as a specific criterion. Dotson v. Henry County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 155 Ga. App. 557, 271 S.E.2d 691 (1980).

"Highest and best use" is factor only if it reflects amount realized from cash sale of the property. That valuation will not be confined to actual use alone, and all criteria added by the General Assembly are to be considered. Dotson v. Henry County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 155 Ga. App. 557, 271 S.E.2d 691 (1980).

"Highest and best use" is a much more speculative assigned value than existing use. Dotson v. Henry County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 155 Ga. App. 557, 271 S.E.2d 691 (1980).

Valuation of income-producing property by income capitalization method.

- In considering existing use, when the use is income producing, it would appear that the income capitalization method should at least be considered, this being a standard method of arriving at value. Dotson v. Henry County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 155 Ga. App. 557, 271 S.E.2d 691 (1980).

Method for fixing fair market value of leaseholds.

- In fixing the fair market value of a leasehold for tax purposes, the rule of "fair market value of property" should always be applied. Delta Air Lines v. Coleman, 219 Ga. 12, 131 S.E.2d 768, cert. denied, 375 U.S. 904, 84 S. Ct. 195, 11 L. Ed. 2d 145 (1963).

Valuation of separate taxable interests when tax liability divided among owners.

- Existence of separate taxable interests and estates in the same property and determination of their respective fair market values for assessment purposes is necessary only when the tax liability is likewise divided among the owners. Martin v. Liberty County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 152 Ga. App. 340, 262 S.E.2d 609 (1979).

Valuation of leases.

- Assessed value must consider, inter alia: existing zoning, existing use, and "any other factors deemed pertinent in arriving at fair market value." Therefore, a consideration of "existing use" (the current leases) must be employed as a "'yardstick' with which to measure fair market value" not hypothetical non-existing leases. Dougherty County Bd. of Equalization v. Castro Dev. Co., 228 Ga. App. 293, 491 S.E.2d 483 (1997).

Valuation of dairy farm cannot be based on sales for speculative or development purposes.

- When the assessed value of rural acreage used as a dairy farm is based primarily on sales of other property, and all the so-called comparable sales are for speculative or development purposes, with the exception of one which was intended for use as a private airport, the statutory formula has not been properly applied. Dotson v. Henry County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 155 Ga. App. 557, 271 S.E.2d 691 (1980).

Club membership's relevancy to valuation of property.

- Although the taxpayers' memberships in a club were not subject to taxation, if a taxpayer relinquished that membership upon sale of the taxpayer's real estate, the buyer could apply for immediate membership, and such an application would normally be granted. Therefore, a county board of tax assessors would have violated Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VII, Sec. I, Para. III and O.C.G.A. § 48-5-1 if the board excluded the enhanced value of the properties attributable to the right to apply for such memberships from ad valorem taxation because the membership was part of the properties' fair market value. Morton v. Glynn County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 294 Ga. App. 901, 670 S.E.2d 528 (2008).

Use of a "value in use in place" standard was not an inappropriate method of determining the fair market value of machinery and equipment for taxation purposes. Flambeau Corp. v. Morgan County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 238 Ga. App. 812, 520 S.E.2d 275 (1999).

Federal tax credits considered.

- Prior to the statutory amendment contained in O.C.G.A. § 48-5-2(3)(B.1), tax credits under 26 U.S.C. § 42 were properly considered in establishing the fair market value of real estate for property tax purposes. Pine Pointe Hous., L.P. v. Lowndes County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 254 Ga. App. 197, 561 S.E.2d 860 (2002).

Historic properties.

- O.C.G.A. § 48-5-2(3)(C) defines "fair market value" of property classified as rehabilitated historic property under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.2 and sets forth the same test to be used when the county tax receiver or tax commissioner enters the basis or value of a parcel of rehabilitated historic property; thus, § 48-5-7.2 did not require that both the rehabilitation process and the Department of Natural Resources final certification process be completed within the two-year period before the owner may have applied for and obtained preferential assessment for the property and a tax board's argument that the board had no value upon which to base the preferential assessment whenever the owner allows the preliminary assessment to lapse upon expiration of the two-year rehabilitation period was without merit. Chatham County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Emmoth, 278 Ga. 144, 598 S.E.2d 495 (2004).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Tax commissioner may legitimately inquire into the cost, depreciation, age, and use of property which is subject to taxation for purposes of investigating the property's fair market value. This does not mean that property is to be returned or assessed for taxation at other than the property's fair market value; nor does it mean property should be assessed at book value rather than fair market value, although in many cases, fair market value may, in fact, be identical with book value. 1963-65 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 113.

Earnings as an element of fair market value of property.

- Formula taking earnings into consideration may be used in arriving at the fair market value of property of a public service corporation; the formula used should not be considered conclusive but be used merely as a guide. 1965-66 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 66-12.

Duty of county tax assessors to periodically update property valuations.

- If the fair market value of property increases every two years, then it is the duty of the county tax assessors to increase the valuation of property for tax purposes every two years. 1969 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 69-504.

Applicability to 1990 and 1991 tax years.

- Neither subsection (1)(E) (now subparagraph (3)(E) ) nor § 48-5-33 (repealed) applies to the 1990 tax year. With respect to the 1991 tax year, absent further constitutional amendment or action by the General Assembly, § 48-5-33 (repealed) governs over subsection (1)(E) to the extent they are inconsistent. 1990 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 90-17.

Administrative caps on assistance grants prohibited.

- Because neither Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VII, Sec. I, Para. III nor the Forest Land Protection Act, O.C.G.A. § 48-5-7.7, authorize or contemplate a cap on assistance grants based on the total exemption value of forest land conservation use property, the Department of Revenue would not be authorized to impose an administrative cap on assistance grants issued pursuant to the Forest Land Protection Act of 2008 in the manner proposed. 2016 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 16-5.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Taxes: valuing undeveloped mining property as prospect, 2 A.L.R. 1550.

Assessment of corporate property at full value according to law when valuations generally are illegally fixed lower, 3 A.L.R. 1370; 28 A.L.R. 983; 55 A.L.R. 503.

Prospective value as basis of valuation of land for purposes of property taxation, 24 A.L.R. 649.

Method or rule for valuation of leasehold interest for purpose of property taxation, 84 A.L.R. 1310.

Rights appurtenant, easements, restrictions, or charges in respect of land as factors in assessment of real property for property taxation, 108 A.L.R. 829.

Valuation of property for purpose of taxation as affected by variation of tax rates for local or special purposes in different local taxing units, or inclusion of property within particular taxing unit, 119 A.L.R. 1300.

Easement as factor in property taxation, 134 A.L.R. 963.

Discretion of court or referee as to mode of valuation of real property for tax purposes, 152 A.L.R. 611.

Application of "blockage rule" or "blockage discount theory" in determining stock valuation, for purposes of taxation of intangibles, 33 A.L.R.2d 607.

Income or rental value as a factor in evaluation of real property for purposes of taxation, 96 A.L.R.2d 666.

Separate assessment and taxation of air rights, 56 A.L.R.3d 1300.

Situs of tangible personal property for purposes of property taxation, 2 A.L.R.4th 432.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 48-5-2 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 7

HERON LAKE II APARTMENTS, L.P. v. LOWNDES COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-09-12

Citation: 299 Ga. 598, 791 S.E.2d 77, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 574

Snippet: order of the superior court declaring that OCGA § 48-5-2 (3) (B.1), 1 which excludes low-income

Newton Timber Co., L.L.L.P. v. Monroe County Board of Tax Assessors

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-03-10

Citation: 295 Ga. 29, 755 S.E.2d 770, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 442, 2014 WL 902258, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 189

Snippet: subparagraph (C) of paragraph (3) of Code Section 48-5-2. (c.l) Tangible real property which qualifies

Columbus Board of Tax Assessors v. Yeoman

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-06-03

Citation: 293 Ga. 107, 744 S.E.2d 18, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1685, 2013 WL 2372178, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 490

Snippet: no conflict between the 2010 amendment to OCGA § 48-5-2 (3) (the “2010 Amendment”) and a 1981 local constitutional

Legacy Investment Group, LLC v. Kenn

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2005-10-24

Citation: 621 S.E.2d 453, 279 Ga. 778, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3197, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 717

Snippet: not pay a premium for its property. See OCGA § 48-5-2(3) ("`Fair market value of property' means the

CHATHAM COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORS v. Emmoth

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-06-28

Citation: 598 S.E.2d 495, 278 Ga. 144, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 2126, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 538

Snippet: determine that value the Board need only look to OCGA § 48-5-2(3)(C), which defines "fair market value" of property

National Health Network, Inc. v. Fulton County

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-03-15

Citation: 514 S.E.2d 422, 270 Ga. 724, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 1051, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 305

Snippet: alleged failure to consider factors listed in OCGA § 48-5-2 that are relevant to fair market value makes the

Dougherty County Board of Tax Assessors v. Burt Realty Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1983-01-04

Citation: 250 Ga. 467, 298 S.E.2d 475, 1983 Ga. LEXIS 536

Snippet: OCGA § 48-5-6 (Code Ann. § 91A-1007); see OCGA § 48-5-2 (Code Ann. § 91A-1001). Thus both tangible personal