Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1913, p. 123, § 5; Code 1933, § 92-6910; Ga. L. 1937, p. 517, § 1; Ga. L. 1953, Jan.-Feb. Sess., p. 189, § 1; Ga. L. 1972, p. 1114, § 4; Code 1933, § 91A-1447, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 309, § 2; Ga. L. 1990, p. 1830, § 1.)
- Board of commissioners of roads and revenues (now county governing authority) has not only the right, but the duty to examine, audit, and approve claims of agents of the board of tax assessors for compensation and expenses; hence, the petition seeking by way of mandamus to require the county treasurer to pay a certain amount for services rendered, failed to state a cause of action. Armistead v. MacNeill, 203 Ga. 204, 45 S.E.2d 652 (1947).
- County board of tax assessors cannot delegate the board's duties pertaining to the equalization of property valuations for ad valorem taxation, nor can a board contract for a private company to seek out unreturned, taxable property and to reevaluate all property in the county. Bagwell v. Cash, 207 Ga. 222, 60 S.E.2d 628 (1950).
- Contingency contract between a county board of tax assessors and a private auditing corporation by which the corporation contingently shared in a percentage of the tax collected was void as against public policy. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Parsons, 260 Ga. 824, 401 S.E.2d 4 (1991).
- County board of tax assessors was authorized to contract with a private firm for audit services to aid the board in discovering unreturned and untaxed property. Eckerd Corp. v. Fayette County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 220 Ga. App. 454, 469 S.E.2d 285 (1996); Wal-Mart Stores v. Board of Tax Assessors, 246 Ga. App. 161, 539 S.E.2d 869 (2000).
Authority to hire and fire a tax appraiser rested with the board of tax appraisers, not with the board of commissioners which previously approved the employment contract. Chambers v. Fulford, 268 Ga. 892, 495 S.E.2d 6 (1998).
- In a breach of contract action centering around a contract of employment with a county employer and the county's board of tax assessors, because the employment contract was never approved by the county commission, and the county's payment of a salary to the employee was not considered a ratification of the contract in the contract's entirety, the employee possessed only an at-will employment. Thus, summary judgment was properly entered against the employee. Powell v. Wheeler County, 290 Ga. App. 508, 659 S.E.2d 893 (2008).
Cited in City of Atlanta v. North By Northwest Civic Ass'n, 262 Ga. 531, 422 S.E.2d 651 (1992).
- Individuals employed in the Ben Hill County Tax Assessor's office above and beyond the minimum staff requirements are employees of the Ben Hill County Board of Tax Assessors, not the board of county commissioners, and the Ben Hill County Board of Tax Assessors need not obtain the approval of the Ben Hill County Board of Commissioners before terminating the employment of those individuals. 1985 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U85-25.
Secretary of a county board of tax assessors can legally serve as a tax commissioner under former Code 1933, §§ 92-6903, 92-6907, and 92-6910 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 48-5-290,48-5-292, and48-5-298). 1952-53 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 303.
- Nonresident corporations may enter into contracts with county boards of tax assessors to assist such boards in mapping, platting, cataloging, indexing, and appraising of taxable property, and to make reevaluations of taxable property, and to search out and appraise unreturned properties in such counties. 1957 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 27.
- County which contracts for the surveying and appraisal of taxable property may not pay any part of the cost of such services from the taxes levied for school purposes. 1952-53 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 341.
Total Results: 3
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-01-26
Citation: 268 Ga. 892, 495 S.E.2d 6, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 316, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 25
Snippet: asserting they are not obligated under OCGA §§ 48-5-298 or 48-5-263 (c) to appropriate county money to
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1992-11-16
Citation: 422 S.E.2d 651, 262 Ga. 531, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 2790, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 944
Snippet: entered the contract under the authority of OCGA § 48-5-298 (a), which provides, among other things, that
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-02-21
Citation: 401 S.E.2d 4, 260 Ga. 824, 1991 WL 21642
Snippet: authority. We agree with the trial court that OCGA § 48-5-298 (a) (3)[1] expressly allows the Board, subject