Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1978, p. 1520, § 2; Ga. L. 1979, p. 1293, § 2; Ga. L. 1999, p. 296, § 24.)
"Complete compensation rule" only applies to the subrogation rights of an insurance carrier who has received compensation from an injured party and the rule does not apply to Medicaid liens; thus, when the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH) had a departmental lien pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 49-4-149(a) against plaintiff recipient's settlement proceeds to recover Medicaid sums that the department expended to pay providers for the recipient's treatment, the DCH's lien was not precluded despite the recipient's claim that the recipient had not received full and complete compensation for the recipient's injuries. Padgett v. Toal, 261 Ga. App. 154, 581 S.E.2d 744 (2003).
- Summary judgment denying the claim of the Department of Medical Assistance (now Department of Community Health) was appropriate when the one-year statute of limitation for recovery on the lien had expired and there was no other viable cause of action made out by the department, when the only claim which the department could make to the money received by a recipient of medical care under the Medicaid program from the tortfeasors was that provided by the lien in O.C.G.A. § 49-4-149, and since the department took no steps to recover the funds as reimbursement from the tortfeasors. Department of Medical Assistance v. Hallman, 203 Ga. App. 615, 417 S.E.2d 218 (1992).
- When the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH) filed a departmental lien against plaintiff recipient's settlement proceeds to recover Medicaid sums that the department expended to pay providers for the recipient's treatment, and the recipient filed a declaratory judgment suit seeking a declaration that DCH's lien was invalid, the trial court properly granted the summary judgment motion of defendant, the Commissioner of the DCH, as, contrary to the recipient's contentions, the DCH's lien under O.C.G.A. § 49-4-149(a) was not invalid even though the DCH was seeking to enforce the lien against another public agency (the board of regents of Georgia's university system, doing business as a medical college) because § 49-4-149(a) allowed the lien against moneys owed by a third party for its liability leading to the recipient's injury and, applying the definitions in O.C.G.A. § 49-4-141(4) and (9), third parties included other public agencies. Padgett v. Toal, 261 Ga. App. 154, 581 S.E.2d 744 (2003).
- When the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH) filed a departmental lien pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 49-4-149(a) against plaintiff recipient's settlement proceeds to recover Medicaid sums that it expended to pay providers for the recipient's treatment, and the recipient filed a declaratory judgment suit, seeking a declaration that the DCH's lien was invalid, the lien was properly found to be valid and, since the settlement proceeds were sufficient to cover both the DCH's lien and the sum of 40 percent of the settlement proceeds which the recipient had agreed to pay the recipient's attorney as a fee, the DCH was not obligated to reduce DCH's lien to take into account the recipient's payment of attorney fees; such reductions only became an issue where the recipient's recovery was inadequate to cover both the DCH's lien and the attorney's lien, in which case lien priority would have been an issue, but it was not an issue in the recipient's case and so, like any other litigant, the recipient was obliged to bear the cost of the recipient's own attorney fees. Padgett v. Toal, 261 Ga. App. 154, 581 S.E.2d 744 (2003).
- Liens established by O.C.G.A. §§ 49-4-149 and44-14-470 are subject to attorney's lien. Holland v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 236 Ga. App. 832, 513 S.E.2d 48 (1999).
- Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH) lien for Medicaid payments made on behalf of recipients applied to all money recovered in the recipients' tort claims, not just the recovery denominated as the medical expense recovery, and DCH was not required to pay any part of the costs of collecting the reimbursement. Richards v. Ga. Dep't of Cmty. Health, 278 Ga. 757, 604 S.E.2d 815 (2004).
- Collateral source rule - Aid or gratuity, 77 A.L.R.3d 366.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-11-08
Citation: 604 S.E.2d 815, 278 Ga. 757, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3563, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 993
Snippet: constitutional challenge to the application of OCGA § 49-4-149, which provides a mechanism for the State to recoup