O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 49-4-149 (2019)

Lien of Department of Community Health against third parties; subrogation to recipients’ insurance claims; assignment of recipients’ claims

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Department of Community Health shall have a lien for the charges for medical care and treatment provided a medical assistance

recipient upon any moneys or other property accruing to the recipient to whom such care was furnished or to his legal representatives as a result of sickness, injury, disease, disability, or death, due to the liability of a third party, which necessitated the medical care. (b) The department may perfect and enforce any lien arising under subsection (a) of this Code section by following the procedures set forth for hospital liens in Code Sections 44-14-470 through 44-14-473; except that the department shall have one year from the date the last item of medical care was furnished to file its verified lien statement; and the statement shall be filed with the appropriate clerk of court in the county wherein the recipient resides and in Fulton County. The verified lien statement shall contain the following: the name and address of the person to whom medical care was furnished; the date of injury; the name and address of the provider or providers furnishing medical care; the dates of services; the amount claimed to be due for the care; and, to the best of the department’s knowledge, the names and addresses of all persons, firms, or corporations claimed to be liable for damages arising from the injuries. This Code section shall not affect the priority of any attorney’s lien. (c) The department shall be subrogated, but only to the extent of the reasonable value of the medical assistance paid and attributable to any sickness, injury, disease, or disability, to the rights of medical assistance recipients to any benefits provided such recipients by virtue of private health care insurance contracts; provided, however, the right of subrogation does not attach to any recipient’s rights to benefits paid or provided under private health care coverage prior to the receipt of written notice, by the carrier who issued the health care contract, of the exercise by the department of its subrogation rights. (d) A recipient of medical assistance who receives medical care for which the department may be obligated to pay shall be deemed to have made assignment to the department of any rights of such person to any payments for such medical care from a third party, up to the amount of medical assistance actually paid by the department; provided, however, assignment does not attach to a recipient’s right to any payments provided under private health care coverage prior to the receipt of written notice, by the carrier who issued the health care coverage, of the exercise by the department of its assignment. This subsection shall apply to a recipient only if notice of this subsection is given to the recipient at the time his application for medical assistance is filed. The assignment created by this subsection shall be effective until the recipient of medical assistance is no longer an eligible recipient for medical assistance.

History

Ga. L. 1978, p. 1520, § 2; Ga. L. 1979, p. 1293, § 2; Ga. L. 1999, p. 296, § 24.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS “Complete compensation rule” only applies to the subrogation rights of an insurance carrier who has received compensation from an injured party and the rule does not apply to Medicaid liens; thus, when the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH) had a departmental lien pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 49-4149(a) against plaintiff recipient’s settlement proceeds to recover Medicaid sums that the department expended to pay providers for the recipient’s treatment, the DCH’s lien was not precluded despite the recipient’s claim that the recipient had not received full and complete compensation for the recipient’s injuries. Padgett v. Toal, 261 Ga. App. 154, 581 S.E.2d 744, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 579 (2003). Department did not take steps to recover funds. - Summary judgment denying the claim of the Department of Medical Assistance (now Department of Community Health) was appropriate when the one-year statute of limitation for recovery on the lien had expired and there was no other viable cause of action made out by the department, when the only claim which the department could make to the money received by a recipient of medical care under the Medicaid program from the tortfeasors was that provided by the lien in O.C.G.A. § 49-4-149, and since the department took no steps to recover the funds as reimbursement from the tortfeasors. Department of Medical Assistance v. Hallman, 203 Ga. App. 615, 417 S.E.2d 218, 1992 Ga. App. LEXIS 544 (1992). Lien valid against public agency as third party. - When the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH) filed a departmental lien against plaintiff recipient’s settlement proceeds to recover Medicaid sums that the department expended to pay providers for the recipient’s treatment, and the recipient filed a declaratory judgment suit seeking a declaration that DCH’s lien was invalid, the trial court properly granted the summary

judgment motion of defendant, the Commissioner of the DCH, as, contrary to the recipient’s contentions, the DCH’s lien under O.C.G.A. § 49-4-149(a) was not invalid even though the DCH was seeking to enforce the lien against another public agency (the board of regents of Georgia’s university system, doing business as a medical college) because O.C.G.A. § 49-4149(a) allowed the lien against moneys owed by a third party for its liability leading to the recipient’s injury and, applying the definitions in O.C.G.A. § 49-4141(4) and (9), third parties included other public agencies. Padgett v. Toal, 261 Ga. App. 154, 581 S.E.2d 744, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 579 (2003). Payment of attorney’s fees. - When the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH) filed a departmental lien pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 49-4-149(a) against plaintiff recipient’s settlement proceeds to recover Medicaid sums that it expended to pay providers for the recipient’s treatment, and the recipient filed a declaratory judgment suit, seeking a declaration that the DCH’s lien was invalid, the lien was properly found to be valid and, since the settlement proceeds were sufficient to cover both the DCH’s lien and the sum of 40 percent of the settlement proceeds which the recipient had agreed to pay the recipient’s attorney as a fee, the DCH was not obligated to reduce DCH’s lien to take into account the recipient’s payment of attorney fees; such reductions only became an issue where the recipient’s recovery was inadequate to cover both the DCH’s lien and the attorney’s lien, in which case lien priority would have been an issue, but it was not an issue in the recipient’s case and so, like any other litigant, the recipient was obliged to bear the cost of the recipient’s own attorney fees. Padgett v. Toal, 261 Ga. App. 154, 581 S.E.2d 744, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 579 (2003). Priority of attorney’s lien. - Liens established by O.C.G.A. §§ 44-14-470 and

49-4-149 are subject to attorney’s lien. Holland v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 236 Ga. App. 832, 513 S.E.2d 48. Lien applies to all funds recovered in tort claim. - Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH) lien for Medicaid payments made on behalf of recipients applied to all money recovered in the

recipients’ tort claims, not just the recovery denominated as the medical expense recovery, and DCH was not required to pay any part of the costs of collecting the reimbursement. Richards v. Ga. Dep’t of Cmty. Health, 278 Ga. 757, 604 S.E.2d 815, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 993 (2004).

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Collateral source rule - Aid or gratuity, 77 A.L.R.3d 366.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1992–2012 · leading case: Richards v. Georgia Dep't of Cmty. Health, 604 S.E.2d 815 (Ga. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Richards v. Georgia Dep't of Cmty. Health, 604 S.E.2d 815 (Ga. 2004). · cites it 30× “In a class action suit, Richards and McCarty mount a statutory and constitutional challenge to the application of OCGA § 49-4-149, which provides a mechanism for the State to recoup money spent on Medicaid benefits.”
McClendon v. Georgia Dep't of Cmty. Health, 261 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “O.C.GA. § 49-4-149(d); see also id. § 49-4-148 (Georgia Department of Community Health may seek reimbursement from third party who is legally liable to pay for recipient’s medical assistance and may be subrogated “only to the extent of such reasonable value of the medical…”
Blige v. M/v Geechee Girl, 180 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (S.D. Ga. 2001). · cites it 8× “§ 49-4-149(a) Blige contends that even if Medicaid has covered all of his medical expenses, he is still entitled to cure in light of O.C.G.A. § 49-4-149(a), since under it Medicaid could try to impress a lien on any recovery he might realize at trial.”
Holland v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 513 S.E.2d 48 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 6× “The Hollands contend the trial court erred by: (1) awarding the entire insurance proceeds to the DMA and FMC, for liens pursuant to OCGA § 49-4-149 and OCGA § 44-14-470 et seq.”
E.M.A. Ex Rel. Plyler v. Cansler, 674 F.3d 290 (4th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “(3) On the basis of Ahlborn 's clear holding that the general anti-lien provision in federal Medicaid law prohibits a state from recovering any portion of a settlement or judgment not attributable to medical expenses, DHHS's lien on E.”
Dep't of Med. Assistance v. Hallman, 417 S.E.2d 218 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 4× “It is not disputed that Speed was qualified for and entitled to have these payments made under these provisions to the providers of his medical care.”
Roberts v. Total Health Care, Inc., 709 A.2d 142 (Md. 1998). “910 (1998); Ga. Code Ann. § 49-4-149 (1994); Haw.Rev.”
State v. Peters, 946 A.2d 1231 (Conn. 2008). “910 (2007); Ga. Code Ann. § 49-4-149 (2006); Haw. Rev.”
Capp v. Carlito's Mexican Bar & Grill 1, Inc., 655 S.E.2d 232 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 49-4-149 (a); Richards v. Ga. Dept.”
Holland v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 536 S.E.2d 270 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “The Georgia Department of Medical Assistance (DMA) and Floyd Medical Center (FMC) asserted liens on David Holland’s cause of action pursuant to OCGA §§ 49-4-149 and 44-14-470. State Farm then filed an interpleader action seeking to determine the priority of the liens asserted by…”
Padgett v. Toal, 581 S.E.2d 744 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 10× “OCGA § 49-4-149 (a) provides that DCH “shall have a lien for the charges for medical care and treatment provided a medical assistance recipient upon any moneys or other property accruing to the recipient to whom such care was furnished .”
E.M.A v. Lanier Cansler (4th Cir. 2012). “910 (1), (4), (6)(a); Ga. Code Ann. § 49-4-149 (d); Haw. Rev. Stat.”
— 49-4-149(a) — 1 case
Blige v. M/v Geechee Girl, 180 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (S.D. Ga. 2001). “§ 49-4-149(a) Blige contends that even if Medicaid has covered all of his medical expenses, he is still entitled to cure in light of O.C.G.A. § 49-4-149(a), since under it Medicaid could try to impress a lien on any recovery he might realize at trial.”
— 49-4-149(b) — 1 case
Blige v. M/v Geechee Girl, 180 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (S.D. Ga. 2001). “§ 49-4-149(a) Blige contends that even if Medicaid has covered all of his medical expenses, he is still entitled to cure in light of O.C.G.A. § 49-4-149(a), since under it Medicaid could try to impress a lien on any recovery he might realize at trial.”
— 49-4-149(d) — 2 cases
McClendon v. Georgia Dep't of Cmty. Health, 261 F.3d 1252 (11th Cir. 2001). “O.C.GA. § 49-4-149(d); see also id. § 49-4-148 (Georgia Department of Community Health may seek reimbursement from third party who is legally liable to pay for recipient’s medical assistance and may be subrogated “only to the extent of such reasonable value of the medical…”
E.M.A. Ex Rel. Plyler v. Cansler, 674 F.3d 290 (4th Cir. 2012). “(3) On the basis of Ahlborn 's clear holding that the general anti-lien provision in federal Medicaid law prohibits a state from recovering any portion of a settlement or judgment not attributable to medical expenses, DHHS's lien on E.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.