O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1 (2019)

Civil penalties for false or fraudulent Medicaid claims

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any person who:

(1) Knowingly presents or causes to be presented to the Georgia Medicaid program a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval;

(2) Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim;

(3) Conspires to commit a violation of paragraph (1), (2), (4), (5), (6), or (7) of this subsection;

(4) Has possession, custody, or control of property or money used or to be used by the Georgia Medicaid program and knowingly delivers, or causes to be delivered, less than all of such property or money;

(5) Is authorized to make or deliver a document certifying receipt of property used, or to be used, by the Georgia Medicaid program and, intending to defraud the Georgia Medicaid program, makes or delivers the receipt without completely knowing that the information on the receipt is true;

(6) Knowingly buys, or receives as a pledge of an obligation or debt, public property from an officer or employee of the Georgia Medicaid program who lawfully may not sell or pledge the property; or

(7) Knowingly makes, uses, or causes to be made or used a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay or transmit property or money to the Georgia Medicaid program, or knowingly conceals or knowingly and improperly avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or transmit property or money to the Georgia Medicaid program, shall be liable to the State of Georgia for a civil penalty consistent with the civil penalties provision of the federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729(a), as adjusted by the federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 2461; Public Law 101-410), and as further amended by the federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Improvements Act of 2015 (Sec. 701 of Public Law 114-74), plus three times the amount of damages which the Georgia Medicaid program sustains because of the act of such person.

(b) The provisions of subsection (a) of this Code section notwithstanding, if the court finds that:

(1) The person committing the violation of this subsection furnished officials of the Georgia Medicaid program with all information known to such person about the violation within 30 days after the date on which the defendant first obtained the information;

(2) Such person fully cooperated with any government investigation of such violation; and

(3) At the time such person furnished the Georgia Medicaid program with the information about the violation, no criminal prosecution, civil action, or administrative action had commenced under this article with respect to such violation, and the person did not have actual knowledge of the existence of an investigation into such violation, the court may assess not more than two times the amount of the actual damages which the Georgia Medicaid program sustained because of the act of such person.

(c) A person violating any provision of subsection (a) of this Code section shall also be liable to this state for all costs of any civil action brought to recover the damages and penalties provided under this article.

(d) As used in this Code section, the term “Georgia Medicaid program” includes any contractor, subcontractor, or agent for the Georgia Medicaid program, including, but not limited to, a managed care program operated, funded, or reimbursed by the Georgia Medicaid program.

History

Code 1981, § 49-4-168.1, enacted by Ga. L. 2007, p. 355, § 3/HB 551; Ga. L. 2009, p. 8, § 49/SB 46; Ga. L. 2012, p. 127, § 2-1/HB 822; Ga. L. 2014, p. 77, § 1/HB 973; Ga. L. 2018, p. 240, § 1/SB 321.

Annotations

Code Commission notes. Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2007, “subsection (a) of this Code section” was substituted for “this subsection” in subsection (c).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Failure to state claim for reverse false claims. - In the plaintiff’s second amended complaint alleging four schemes

that resulted in the presentation of false or fraudulent claims for payment to Medicaid and PeachCare in violation of the

Georgia False Medicaid Claims Act, O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168 et seq., the complaint failed to state any cause of action for reverse false claims because the defendants did not owe money to the Georgia Medicaid program as the defendants did not submit any claims to the Georgia Medicaid program that resulted in overpayment. Hill v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Ga., 351 Ga. App. 455, 829 S.E.2d 193, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 423 (2019), cert. denied, No. S19C1531, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 164 (Ga. Feb. 28, 2020). Construction with federal AntiKickback Statute. - The trial court did not err in denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss an action under the Georgia False Medical Claims Act (GFMCA), O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168 et seq., because a false or fraudulent claim under GFMCA included a claim that involved items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b. Lipman v. State of Ga., 366 Ga. App. 720, 884 S.E.2d 115, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS 69 (2023). No civil liability for claims when not submitted to Georgia Medicaid program. - In the plaintiff’s second amended complaint alleging four schemes that resulted in the presentation of false or fraudulent claims for payment to Medicaid and PeachCare in violation of the

Georgia False Medicaid Claims Act (GFMCA), O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168 et seq., the complaint failed to state a claim with regard to balance billing because that scheme related to the billing of patients, not the billing of the Georgia Medicaid program as required to state a claim under the GFMCA; and the GFMCA did not provide civil liability for claims submitted to anyone other than the Georgia Medicaid program. Hill v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Ga., 351 Ga. App. 455, 829 S.E.2d 193, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 423 (2019), cert. denied, No. S19C1531, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 164 (Ga. Feb. 28, 2020). Failure to state claim for implied false certification. - In the plaintiff’s second amended complaint alleging four schemes that resulted in the presentation of false or fraudulent claims for payment to Medicaid and PeachCare in violation of the Georgia False Medicaid Claims Act, O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168 et seq., the complaint failed to state a claim for implied false certification as written informed consent for the claims submitted by the defendants was not required, and the defendants did not violate any requirement with regard to plans of care. Hill v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Ga., 351 Ga. App. 455, 829 S.E.2d 193, 2019 Ga. App. LEXIS 423 (2019), cert. denied, No. S19C1531, 2020 Ga. LEXIS 164 (Ga. Feb. 28, 2020).

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Liability for trespass or nuisance in hydraulic fracturing, hydro-fracturing, or hydro-fracking, 41 A.L.R.7th Art. 1. Measure and elements of damages under State False Claims Acts, 41 A.L.R.7th Art. 2.

Recognition and application of tort of negligent assault and battery and indirect battery, 41 A.L.R.7th Art. 8. Reverse false claims under State False Claims Act, 46 A.L.R.7th Art. 2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (8 in the last 5 years), 2011–2025 · leading case: Hill v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Georgia Et Al., 829 S.E.2d 193 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).
Hill v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Georgia Et Al., 829 S.E.2d 193 (Ga. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 10× “OCGA § 49-4-168.1. As pertinent to Schemes 1 and 2, a person violates that act when he or she "[k]nowingly presents or causes to be presented to the Georgia Medicaid program a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval[.”
New York v. Amgen Inc., 652 F.3d 103 (1st Cir. 2011). “Gov’t Code § 12651(a)(1)-(3); Ga.Code Ann. § 49-4-168.1(a)(l)-(3); 740 111.”
United States Ex Rel. Nowak v. Medtronic, Inc., 806 F. Supp. 2d 310 (D. Mass. 2011). “082 (2)(a)-(b); Ga.Code Ann. § 49-4-168.1; Haw.Rev.Stat. § 661-21 (a)(l)-(2); 740 Ill.”
United States ex rel. King v. Solvay S.A., 823 F. Supp. 2d 472 (S.D. Tex. 2011). “Ga.Code Ann. § 49-4-168.1 (West, Westlaw through 2011 Reg.”
John C. Lipman v. State of Georgia (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 5× “Because this conduct violated the AKS, Defendants had presented false or fraudulent claims to Georgia Medicaid, in violation of the GFMCA, specifically OCGA § 49-4-168.1 (a) (1). Defendants’ receipt of illegal kickbacks from Merit resulted in over $540,000 in damages to Georgia…”
United States v. Genesis Global Healthcare (S.D. Ga. 2023). · cites it 4× “1(a)(2); (7) a GFMCA conspiracy claim under O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1(a)(3); and (8) a GFMCA claim concerning “reverse false claims” under O.”
Est. of Debbie Helmly v. Bethany Hospice & Palliative Care of Coastal Georgia, LLC (11th Cir. 2021). · cites it 3× “§§ 3729–3733, and the Georgia False Medicaid Claims Act, O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1. In particular, Relators alleged that Bethany Hospice violated the so-called Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”), 42 U.”
Walthour (ex Rel) v. Middle Georgia Fam. Rehab LLC (M.D. Ga. 2022). · cites it 2× “” O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1 (a)(1)–(2). Since the GFMCA follows the wording of the FCA so closely, the one analysis will thoroughly address claims under both federal and state statutes.”
Hockaday v. Athens Orthopedic Clinic Pa (M.D. Ga. 2022). · cites it 2× “O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1(a)(1). The Court finds that a bill to a government program is a false or fraudulent claim if it seeks funds for a service or item that is tainted by an illegal kickback.”
United States of Am., ex rel. v. Elite Healthcare Enter., Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2023). · cites it 2× “§ 3729 (a)(1); O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1(a). The FCA civil penalty amounts are periodically adjusted for inflation pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (the “Inflation Adjustment Act”).”
Mazik v. Kaiser Permanente, Inc. (E.D. Cal. 2024). “§ 23-3-127 ; see also Ga. Code Ann. § 49-4-168.1 (“Any person who .”
Barbara Senters v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc. (11th Cir. 2025). “§ 3729 , the Georgia False Medicaid Claims Act, O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1, and the Georgia Medical Assistance Act, O.”
— 49-4-168.1(a) — 1 case
United States of Am., ex rel. v. Elite Healthcare Enter., Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2023). “§ 3729 (a)(1); O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1(a). The FCA civil penalty amounts are periodically adjusted for inflation pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (the “Inflation Adjustment Act”).”
— 49-4-168.1(a)(1) — 2 cases
Hockaday v. Athens Orthopedic Clinic Pa (M.D. Ga. 2022). “O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1(a)(1). The Court finds that a bill to a government program is a false or fraudulent claim if it seeks funds for a service or item that is tainted by an illegal kickback.”
Est. of Debbie Helmly v. Bethany Hospice & Palliative Care of Coastal Georgia, LLC (11th Cir. 2021). “§§ 3729–3733, and the Georgia False Medicaid Claims Act, O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1. In particular, Relators alleged that Bethany Hospice violated the so-called Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”), 42 U.”
— 49-4-168.1(a)(2) — 1 case
Est. of Debbie Helmly v. Bethany Hospice & Palliative Care of Coastal Georgia, LLC (11th Cir. 2021). “§§ 3729–3733, and the Georgia False Medicaid Claims Act, O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1. In particular, Relators alleged that Bethany Hospice violated the so-called Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”), 42 U.”
— 49-4-168.1(a)(3) — 1 case
United States v. Genesis Global Healthcare (S.D. Ga. 2023). “1(a)(2); (7) a GFMCA conspiracy claim under O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1(a)(3); and (8) a GFMCA claim concerning “reverse false claims” under O.”
— 49-4-168.1(a)(7) — 1 case
United States v. Genesis Global Healthcare (S.D. Ga. 2023). “1(a)(2); (7) a GFMCA conspiracy claim under O.C.G.A. § 49-4-168.1(a)(3); and (8) a GFMCA claim concerning “reverse false claims” under O.”
— 49-4-168.1(a)(l) — 1 case
New York v. Amgen Inc., 652 F.3d 103 (1st Cir. 2011). “Gov’t Code § 12651(a)(1)-(3); Ga.Code Ann. § 49-4-168.1(a)(l)-(3); 740 111.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.