O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 49-4-169 (2019)

Legislative findings and intent

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The General Assembly finds that changes in the approval process of certain health care programs have made it difficult for children with disabilities who are eligible for medical assistance pursuant to Article 7 of this chapter to receive the services to which they are entitled with the frequency and within the time periods which are appropriate. Separate administration of the categorically needy and the medically fragile programs should not result in any variation in the amount, duration, and scope of services. Redundant paperwork requirements have hampered service approvals and delivery and reduced the number of providers serving children. It is the intent of this article to ensure that children with disabilities receive the medically necessary therapy services to which they are entitled under the Medicaid Early Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment Program and that categorically needy and medically fragile children have available to them the same scope, duration, and amount of services. It is also the intent of this article to simplify the process and paperwork by which occupational, speech, and physical therapy services are applied for and received by eligible recipients.

History

Code 1981, § 49-4-169, enacted by Ga. L. 2008, p. 743, § 1/SB 507.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: United States ex rel. Grenadyor v. Ukranian Vill. Pharmacy, Inc., 895 F. Supp. 2d 872 (N.D. Ill. 2012).
United States ex rel. Grenadyor v. Ukranian Vill. Pharmacy, Inc., 895 F. Supp. 2d 872 (N.D. Ill. 2012). “(“IWRPA”) for retaliation; (6) violation of the IWRPA for knowingly causing false claims to be presented to the state of Illinois; (Count 7 was dropped due the voluntary dismissal of a Florida entity); (8) violation of the Georgia State False Medicaid Claims Act, Ga.Code §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.