Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448If upon the trial of any appeal it shall appear to the jury that the appeal was frivolous and intended for delay only, they shall assess damages against the appellant and his security, if any, in favor of the appellee for such delay, not exceeding 25 percent on the principal sum which they shall find due, which damages shall be specially noted in their verdict.
(Laws 1799, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 495; Code 1863, § 3552; Code 1868, § 3575; Ga. L. 1868, p. 132, § 2; Code 1873, § 3631; Code 1882, § 3631; Civil Code 1895, § 4473; Civil Code 1910, § 5018; Code 1933, § 6-602; Ga. L. 1983, p. 884, § 3-2.)
- Purpose of this section is to inflict punishment and to compensate respondent for delay, costs, and vexation caused by frivolous appeal. Garrison v. Wilcoxson, 11 Ga. 154 (1852); Adams v. Carnes, 111 Ga. 505, 36 S.E. 597 (1900); Hardy v. Truitt, 20 Ga. App. 529, 93 S.E. 149 (1917).
- O.C.G.A. § 5-3-31 does not provide the exclusive remedy for imposition of sanctions for appeals to the superior court; the statute applies only to cases of appeal wherein the jury returns a verdict for a sum of money. Osofsky v. Board of Mayor & Comm'rs, 237 Ga. App. 404, 515 S.E.2d 413 (1998).
To justify assessment of damages, appeal must be both frivolous and intended for delay. Gunnels v. Deavours, 57 Ga. 177 (1876).
- Appeal is intended to delay only when entirely without merit and entered merely to postpone creditor in collection of debt. Clark v. Fee, 86 Ga. 9, 12 S.E. 181 (1890).
Appellant's failure to submit evidence, by itself, is not conclusive of issue of intent to delay. Gilmore v. Wright, 20 Ga. 198 (1856).
In determining whether appeal is frivolous and intended to delay, the jury must consider all evidence. Garrison v. Wilcoxson, 11 Ga. 154 (1852).
Cited in Tommey & Stewart v. Finney, 45 Ga. 155 (1872); Robinson v. Medlock, 59 Ga. 598 (1877).
- Amount of damages (under subsection (a)) is for determination by jury, uninfluenced by opinion of court. McMillan v. Lawrence, Smith & Whilden, 25 Ga. 189 (1858).
- See McMillan v. Lawrence, Smith & Whilden, 25 Ga. 189 (1858).
- Only in extreme cases should 25 percent maximum damages be awarded. McMillan v. Lawrence, Smith & Whilden, 25 Ga. 189 (1858).
O.C.G.A. § 5-3-31 applies only to appeals which are de novo investigations. Butlerhouse Maintenance Co. v. Greeson, 174 Ga. App. 637, 331 S.E.2d 46 (1985).
- Inasmuch as provisions of section are necessarily applicable to those cases only in which money verdicts are rendered, the judgment cannot be enforced in claim cases. Adams v. Carnes, 111 Ga. 505, 36 S.E. 597 (1900).
Section applicable to appeal by garnishee. Davis v. Rhodes, 112 Ga. 106, 37 S.E. 169 (1900).
- Provisions of O.C.G.A. § 5-3-31 providing for the award of attorney's fees against a party bringing a frivolous appeal do not apply to appeals to the superior court of decisions of the Workers' Compensation Board pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 34-9-105. Butlerhouse Maintenance Co. v. Greeson, 174 Ga. App. 637, 331 S.E.2d 46 (1985).
- If, after reviewing the whole matter the court believes that the plaintiff in error is presenting a bona fide contest over a colorable matter, though the plaintiff's view of the law may not in fact be well founded, or that the plaintiff is seeking a ruling upon an open or doubtful question, damages will be refused. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Blankenship Plumbing Co., 153 Ga. App. 335, 265 S.E.2d 66 (1980).
Property alienated pending appeal is bound for payment of damages for frivolous appeal just as it is for payment of the rest of the amount of appeal judgment. Phillips v. Behn & Foster, 19 Ga. 298 (1856).
- 5 Am. Jur. 2d, Appellate Review, §§ 891, 892.
- 5 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 754.
- Award of damages for dilatory tactics in prosecuting appeal in state court, 91 A.L.R.3d 661.
Total Results: 4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-06-25
Snippet: then asked Judge Peterson 22 See OCGA §§ 53-3-1 (providing, in pertinent part, that a decedent’s
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-05-31
Citation: 710 S.E.2d 810, 289 Ga. 233, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 1602, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 437
Snippet: of the estate called a year's support. OCGA §§ 53-3-1(c); 53-3-5(a). See also Radford, 1 Ga. Wills &
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1993-05-03
Citation: 428 S.E.2d 568, 263 Ga. 104, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1762, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 404
Snippet: jurisdiction over the probate of wills." OCGA § 53-3-1 (a). A superior court cannot enjoin the offer of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-09-09
Citation: 257 Ga. 364, 359 S.E.2d 899
Snippet: (Emphasis supplied.) On the other hand, OCGA § 53-3-1 declares that “[t]he residence of the testator