O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 5-6-50 (2019)

Procedure provided by article supersedes former appellate procedure

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The procedure provided in this article shall serve all purposes which a bill of exceptions or writ of error has served in the past; and, where under any law of force in this state provision is made for the taking of writs of error or bills of exception, the procedure prescribed in this article shall be deemed to apply in lieu thereof as to the procedure and as to all time requirements.

History

(Ga. L. 1965, p. 18, § 19.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Judgments traditionally reviewable under writ of error are reviewable under notice of appeal. - Basically whatever judgments were traditionally reviewable as being final a judgment under a writ of error are reviewable under a notice of appeal. Crowe v. Holloway Dev. Corp., 114 Ga. App. 856, 152 S.E.2d 913 (1966). Cited in Bishop v. Lamkin, 221 Ga. 691, 146 S.E.2d 769 (1966); Peters v. Liberty

Mut. Ins. Co., 113 Ga. App. 41, 147 S.E.2d 26 (1966); Travelers Ins. Co. v. Merritt, 124 Ga. App. 42, 183 S.E.2d 73 (1971); Rucker v. State, 124 Ga. App. 491, 184 S.E.2d 228 (1971); Milam v. Housing Auth., 129 Ga. App. 188, 199 S.E.2d 107 (1973); State v. Eubanks, 239 Ga. 483, 238 S.E.2d 38 (1977); Middle Ga. Bank v. Continental Real Estate & Assocs., 168 Ga. App. 611, 309 S.E.2d 893 (1983).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms. - 2 Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Appeal and Error, § 2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1983–1983 · leading case: Middle Georgia Bank v. Cont'l Real Est. & Assocs., Inc., 309 S.E.2d 893 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).
Middle Georgia Bank v. Cont'l Real Est. & Assocs., Inc., 309 S.E.2d 893 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “In support of the alleged oral contract, the Bank filed an affidavit from Durham which stated that Durham would not have issued the $500 check on behalf of Cook unless he had been assured by Continental that it would wait to deposit the check until he or Cook had approved the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.