O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 50-3-1 (2019)

Description of state flag; militia to carry flag; monument offenses; penalties; causes of action

✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The flag of the State of Georgia shall consist of a square canton on a field of three horizontal bands of equal width. The top and bottom bands shall be scarlet and the center band white. The bottom band shall extend the entire length of the flag, while the center and top bands shall extend from the canton to the fly end of the flag. The canton of the flag shall consist of a square of blue the width of two of the bands, in the upper left of the hoist of the flag. In the center of the canton shall be placed a representation in gold of the coat of arms of Georgia as shown in the center of the obverse of the great seal of the State of Georgia adopted in 1799 and amended in 1914. Centered immediately beneath the coat of arms shall be the words “IN GOD WE TRUST” in capital letters. The coat of arms and wording “IN GOD WE TRUST” shall be encircled by 13 white five-pointed stars, representing Georgia and the 12 other original states that formed the United States of America. Official specifications of the flag, including color identification system, type sizes and fonts, and overall dimensions, shall be established by the Secretary of State, who pursuant to Code Section 50-3-4 serves as custodian of the state flag. Every force of the organized militia shall carry this flag while on parade or review.

(b)(1) As used in this subsection, the term:

(A) “Agency” means any state or local government entity, including any department, agency, bureau, authority, board, educational institution, commission, or instrumentality or subdivision thereof, and specifically including a local board of education, the Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, and any institution of the University System of Georgia.

(B) “Monument” means a monument, plaque, statue, marker, flag, banner, structure name, display, or memorial constructed and located with the intent of being permanently displayed and perpetually maintained that is:

(i) Dedicated to a historical entity or historically significant military, religious, civil, civil rights, political, social, or cultural events or series of events; or

(ii) Dedicated to, honors, or recounts the military service of any past or present military personnel of this state; the United States of America or the several states thereof; or the Confederate States of America or the several states thereof.

(C) “Officer” means an officer, official, body, employee, contractor, representative, or agent of any agency, whether appointed or elected.

(2) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or other entity to mutilate, deface, defile, or abuse contemptuously any publicly owned monument located, erected, constructed, created, or maintained on real property owned by an agency or the State of Georgia. No officer or agency shall remove or conceal from display any such monument for the purpose of preventing the visible display of the same. A violation of this paragraph shall constitute a misdemeanor.

(3) No publicly owned monument erected, constructed, created, or maintained on the public property of this state or its agencies, departments, authorities, or instrumentalities or on real property owned by an agency or the State of Georgia shall be relocated, removed, concealed, obscured, or altered in any fashion by any officer or agency; provided, however, that appropriate measures for the preservation, protection, and interpretation of such monument or memorial shall not be prohibited.

(4) Any person or entity that damages, destroys, or loses a monument or that takes or removes a monument without replacing it shall be liable for treble the amount of the full cost of repair or replacement of such monument and may be subject to exemplary damages unless such person or entity was authorized to take such action by the public entity owning such monument. In addition to treble the cost of repair or replacement and possible exemplary damages, the person or entity shall also be liable for the attorney’s fees and court costs expended by the public entity owner of the monument or person, group, or legal entity in any action or proceeding required to establish liability and collect amounts owed. Should a public entity owner of the monument or person, group, or other legal entity prevail in any action under this Code section, such prevailing party shall timely pay for the cost of or repair or placement of the monument upon moneys being collected from the party damaging, destroying, or losing such monument.

(5) A public entity owning a monument or any person, group, or legal entity shall have a right to bring a cause of action for any conduct prohibited by this Code section for damages as permitted by this Code section. Such action shall be brought in the superior court of the county in which the monument was located.

(6) Except as provided in this paragraph, it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or other entity acting without authority to mutilate, deface, defile, abuse contemptuously, relocate, remove, conceal, or obscure any privately owned monument located on privately owned property. Any person or entity that suffers injury or damages as a result of a violation of this paragraph may bring an action individually or in a representative capacity against the person or persons committing such violations to seek to recover general and exemplary damages sustained as a result of such person’s or persons’ unlawful actions. This paragraph shall not apply to an owner of real property storing privately owned monuments.

(7) Nothing in this Code section shall prevent an agency from relocating a monument when relocation is necessary for the construction, expansion, or alteration of edifices, buildings, roads, streets, highways, or other transportation construction projects. Any monument relocated for such purposes shall be relocated to a site of similar prominence, honor, visibility, and access within the same county or municipality in which the monument was originally located. A monument shall not be relocated to a museum, cemetery, or mausoleum unless it was originally placed at such location.

(c) Any other provision of law notwithstanding, the memorial to the heroes of the Confederate States of America graven upon the face of Stone Mountain shall never be altered, removed, concealed, or obscured in any fashion and shall be preserved and protected for all time as a tribute to the bravery and heroism of the citizens of this state who suffered and died in their cause.

History

Ga. L. 1916, p. 158, § 3; Code 1933, § 86-1004; Ga. L. 1951, p. 311, § 43; Ga. L. 1955, p. 10, § 90; Ga. L. 1956, p. 38, § 1; Ga. L. 2001, p. 1, § 1; Ga. L. 2003, p.

26, § 1; Ga. L. 2004, p. 731, § 1; Ga. L. 2019, p. 268, § 1/SB 77; Ga. L. 2021, p. 922, § 50/HB 497. The 2021 amendment, effective May 10, 2021, part of an Act to revise, modern-

ize, and correct the Code, substituted “great seal of the State of Georgia” for “Great Seal of the State of Georgia” in the fifth sentence of subsection (a).

Annotations

Cross references. Display of state flag by agencies, § 4512-83.1. Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2003, p. 26, § 2, not codified by the General Assembly, called for a referendum to modify the state flag which was held on March 2, 2004, and the 2003 State Flag, adopted at the 2003 Session of the General Assembly, was approved by a vote of 577,370 to 212,020. Ga. L. 2003, p. 26, § 3, not codified by the General Assembly, provides for severability.

Law reviews. For note on the 2001 amendment to this Code section, see 18 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 305 (2001). For note on the 2003 amendment to this Code section, see 20 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 256 (2003). For note, “How Devolved is Too Devolved?: A Comparative Analysis Examining the Allocation of Power Between State and Local Government Through the Lens of the Confederate Monument Controversy,” see 53 Ga. L. Rev. 371 (2018). For article on the 2019 amendment of this Code section, see 36 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 219 (2019).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Constitutionality of flag. - Georgia state flag, which incorporated the stars and bars of the Confederate flag, did not violate an African-American citizen’s equal protection rights, even though a discriminatory purpose was a motivating factor in the passage of O.C.G.A. § 50-3-1 since the evidence failed to show a sufficiently concrete, present-day discriminatory impact on African-Americans. Coleman v. Miller, 885 F. Supp. 1561, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4103 (N.D. Ga. 1995); Coleman v. Miller, 912 F. Supp. 522, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121 (N.D. Ga. 1996), aff’d, 117 F.3d 527, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 18163 (11th Cir. 1997). State flag, incorporating the stars and bars of the Confederate flag, did not violate the due process clause by depriving an African-American citizen of any fundamental privacy interest in associating with white people free from unwarranted government intrusion since the record did not support the claim. Moreover, the plaintiff’s right to associate with white people in general is not the type of intimate relationship garnering constitutional protection under this theory. Coleman v. Miller, 885 F. Supp. 1561, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4103 (N.D. Ga. 1995); Coleman v. Miller, 912 F. Supp. 522, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121 (N.D. Ga. 1996), aff’d, 117 F.3d 527, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 18163 (11th Cir. 1997).

African-American citizen’s argument that the state flag, incorporating the stars and bars of the Confederate flag, compelled the African-American citizen to be the courier of a morally objectionable ideological message failed because the flag on the flag’s face does not promulgate a sufficiently clear message of discrimination and because the record contained no evidence that the citizen was forced to acknowledge the flag in any way. Coleman v. Miller, 885 F. Supp. 1561, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4103 (N.D. Ga. 1995); Coleman v. Miller, 912 F. Supp. 522, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121 (N.D. Ga. 1996), aff’d, 117 F.3d 527, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 18163 (11th Cir. 1997). Display of the Georgia state flag did not violate an African-American citizen’s constitutional rights to equal protection and freedom of expression. Coleman v. Miller, 117 F.3d 527, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 18163 (11th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1011, 118 S. Ct. 1199, 140 L. Ed. 2d 328, 1998 U.S. LEXIS 1741 (1998). Validity under federal law. - For discussion of the state flag in relation to the federal Smith Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2385, Title II of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000a, and the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1971(b), see Coleman v. Miller, 885 F. Supp. 1561, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4103 (N.D. Ga. 1995); Coleman v. Miller, 912 F. Supp. 522, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS

121 (N.D. Ga. 1996), aff’d, 117 F.3d 527, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 18163 (11th Cir. 1997). Lack of standing in actions to remove confederate monuments. - Judgments dismissing consolidated cases seeking to prevent the removal of Confederate statues in two counties was upheld because the appellants lacked standing to file suit since the appellants suffered no injury. Sons of Conf. Veterans v. Newton County Bd. of Comm’rs, 360 Ga. App. 798, 861 S.E.2d 653, 2021 Ga. App. LEXIS 395 (2021), rev’d in part, aff’d, 315 Ga. 39, 880 S.E.2d 168, 2022 Ga. LEXIS 284 (2022). In an action seeking to restore a Confederate monument to the city square, the trial court did not err by concluding the plaintiffs lacked standing as plaintiffs were not parties to the prior action and, thus, could not bring a collateral attack against the judgment in that case, and did not allege any concrete or particularized injury or asserted any other injury other than complaining that removal of the monument violated O.C.G.A. § 50-3-1. Ga.

Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. v. Downs, 365 Ga. App. 280, 878 S.E.2d 130, 2022 Ga. App. LEXIS 431 (2022). Georgia Supreme Court held only plaintiffs with a cognizable injury can bring a suit in Georgia courts; unlike federal law, however, that injury need not always be individualized; sometimes it can be a generalized grievance shared by community members, especially other residents, taxpayers, voters, or citizens. Sons of Confederate Veterans v. Henry County Bd. of Comm’rs, 315 Ga. 39, 880 S.E.2d 168, 2022 Ga. LEXIS 284 (2022). Plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge defendant’s decision to remove a Confederate monument under O.C.G.A. § 50-3-1 because plaintiffs did not allege that they were citizens, residents, or taxpayers of the defendant, and, therefore, the plaintiffs did not allege that they were stakeholders to whom defendant owed the duty created by that statute. Williams v. Harvey, 366 Ga. App. 395, 883 S.E.2d 145, 2023 Ga. App. LEXIS 13 (2023).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 35A Am. Jur. 2d, Flag, §§ 1, 2.

C.J.S. 36A C.J.S., Flags, § 1 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1995–2025 · leading case: Sons of Confederate Vets. v. Henry Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners (two Cases), 880 S.E.2d 168 (Ga. 2022).
Sons of Confederate Vets. v. Henry Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners (two Cases), 880 S.E.2d 168 (Ga. 2022). · cites it 115× “Davis Humphries, as a private citizen, has standing to assert a claim for injunctive relief against her local county government for its planned removal of a Confederate monument in alleged violation of OCGA § 50-3-1. But 3 the other plaintiffs — the various Sons of Confederate…”
Coleman v. Miller, 912 F. Supp. 522 (N.D. Ga. 1996). · cites it 8× “At issue is the constitutionality of the current state flag of Georgia, established by the Georgia General Assembly in 1956 *525 pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-3-1. Plaintiff, an African-American citizen, seeks an injunction ordering the immediate removal of the Georgia flag from all…”
Coleman v. Miller, 885 F. Supp. 1561 (N.D. Ga. 1995). · cites it 6× “At issue is the constitutionality of the current state flag of Georgia, established by the Georgia General Assembly in 1956 pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 50-3-1. Plaintiff is an African-American citizen.”
T. Davis Humphries v. Newton Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners (Ga. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 40× “In this consolidated appeal, we are asked to consider questions of standing and sovereign immunity under OCGA § 50-3-1 in relation to decisions made by the Newton County Board of Commissioners and the Henry County Board of Commissioners to remove Confederate monuments located in…”
Bennie Williams v. Cornell Harvey (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 28× “4 So viewed, the record shows that on December 12, 2021, the Sons of Confederate Veterans filed a complaint for damages and injunctive relief against the City on the ground that the City’s vote to remove a Confederate monument was done in violation of OCGA § 50-3-1.”
T. Davis Humphries v. Newton Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners (Ga. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 24× “A21A0735 by concluding she has standing to bring an action against the Newton County Board of Commissioners under OCGA § 50-3-1, we must now consider whether her action for injunctive relief is barred by sovereign immunity (an issue which the Supreme Court understandably did not…”
Preston D. Lewis v. City of Brunswick (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 22× “00” for the City’s removal of the monument and violation of OCGA § 50-3-1. After the City failed to pay their demand, the Sons of Confederate Veterans filed the underlying lawsuit, stating that the monument was publicly owned.”
Georgia Divison, Sons of Confederate Vets., Inc. v. Bryan a. Downs, in His Offical Capacity as City Attorney of the City of Decatur (Ga. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 12× “to the Prior Action, could bring a collateral attack against the judgment in that case, the trial court properly dismissed the case because, based on existing case law, they “do not have standing to bring this action [because] they have not alleged any concrete or particularized…”
Georgia Divison, Sons of Confederate Vets., Inc. v. Bryan a. Downs, in His Offical Capacity as City Attorney of the City of Decatur (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 8× “set forth no allegations showing that they [were] community stakeholders, such that the duty created by OCGA § 50-3-1 [was] one that [was] owed to them.”
Edward E. Williams v. Dekalb Cnty. (Ga. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 6× “In Sons of Confederate Veterans, “various Sons of Confederate Veterans entities” and a Newton County resident filed actions against the Henry County and Newton County boards of commissioners, respectively, to challenge the boards’ votes to remove Confederate monuments from…”
Keondrae Stillwell v. Topa Ins. Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “S22C0039 (March 8, 2022) (granting writ of certiorari and noting that “[t]o the extent that OCGA § 50-3-1 (b) (5) creates a cause of action allowing any person, group, or legal entity to seek damages without a showing of individualized injury, does the Georgia Constitution…”
Stephen Hughes v. Gwinnett Cnty. (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “See also Sons of Confederate Veterans, supra at 40 5 (citizen had standing to challenge local government’s removal of a monument in violation of OCGA § 50-3-1); Likewise, if Hughes were only challenging local legislative action and was “not challenging the constitutionality of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.