Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 51-1-29.1 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 51-1-29.1 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 51-1-29.1

TITLE 51 TORTS

Section 1. General Provisions, 51-1-1 through 51-1-55.

51-1-29.1. Liability of voluntary health care provider and sponsoring organization.

  1. Without waiving or affecting and cumulative of any existing immunity from any source, unless it is established that injuries or death were caused by gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct:
    1. No health care provider licensed under Chapter 9, 11, 26, 30, 33, or 34 of Title 43 who voluntarily and without the expectation or receipt of compensation provides professional services, within the scope of such health care provider's licensure, for and at the request of a hospital, public school, nonprofit organization, or an agency of the state or one of its political subdivisions or provides such professional services to a person at the request of such an organization, which organization does not expect or receive compensation with respect to such services from the recipient of such services; or
    2. No licensed hospital, public school, or nonprofit organization which requests, sponsors, or participates in the providing of the services under the circumstances provided in paragraph (1) of this subsection

      shall be liable for damages or injuries alleged to have been sustained by the person nor for damages for the injury or death of the person when the injuries or death are alleged to have occurred by reason of an act or omission in the rendering of such services.

  2. Nothing in this Code section shall be construed to change the scope of practice of any health care provider granted immunity in this Code section.
  3. This Code section shall apply only to causes of action arising on or after July 1, 1987.

(Code 1981, §51-1-29.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1987, p. 887, § 4; Ga. L. 1987, p. 986, § 2; Ga. L. 1998, p. 859, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 81, § 51; Ga. L. 2007, p. 47, § 51/SB 103.)

Code Commission notes.

- The enactment of this Code section by Ga. L. 1987, p. 887, § 4, irreconcilably conflicted with and was treated as superseded by Ga. L. 1987, p. 986, § 2. See County of Butts v. Strahan, 151 Ga. 417 (1921).

Law reviews.

- For article, "Torts," see 53 Mercer L. Rev. 441 (2001).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Prima facie case of immunity under O.C.G.A. § 51-1-29.1 was established by a physician's affidavit that neither the physician's nor the physician's professional corporation expected or received any public or private source payment for the physician's on-call services. Washington v. Clark, 250 Ga. App. 242, 550 S.E.2d 671 (2001).

In a medical malpractice action, as affidavits from a decedent's mother and girlfriend created a fact issue regarding a doctor's expectation of payment which required resolution by a jury, the trial court erred in granting the doctor's summary judgment motion pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 51-1-29.1. Travick v. Lee, 278 Ga. App. 823, 630 S.E.2d 99 (2006).

Summary judgment in favor of a doctor and a clinic for the post-op treatment of a patient was upheld on appeal, as: (1) both remained immune from suit under O.C.G.A. § 51-1-29.1; (2) the doctor's treatment of the decedent's complications immediately following the decedent's surgery did not change the voluntary nature of the treatment as a whole; (3) it was reasonable to expect that a physician would continue to treat a patient following surgery; and (4) the appeals court viewed the doctor's voluntary treatment of the decedent as a whole, not divided into categories of preoperative, operative, and post-operative; moreover, because no evidence was presented that either the doctor or the clinic was a "charitable institution," and O.C.G.A. § 51-1-29.1 provided no such exception, waiver of any common-law charitable immunity through the doctor's procurement of liability insurance did not apply. Wells v. Rogers, 281 Ga. App. 473, 636 S.E.2d 171 (2006), cert. denied, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 101 (Ga. 2007).

Cited in Walker v. Fulton-DeKalb Hosp. Auth., 200 Ga. App. 750, 409 S.E.2d 529 (1991); Porquez v. Washington, 268 Ga. 649, 492 S.E.2d 665 (1997); Washington v. Georgia Baptist Medical Ctr., 230 Ga. App. 654, 501 S.E.2d 1 (1998).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

- 65 C.J.S., Negligence, § 40. 65A C.J.S., Negligence, § 342.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 51-1-29.1

Total Results: 4  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Hous. Auth. of Savannah v. Greene, 383 S.E.2d 867 (Ga. 1989).

Cited 56 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 28, 1989 | 259 Ga. 435

...required affidavit with the complaint. [2] Section 2 of the Act amends OCGA § 9-3-73, relating to certain disabilities and exceptions applicable to the period of limitation for medical-malpractice actions. Section 4 enacts a new Code section, OCGA § 51-1-29.1, generally providing that where professional healthcare services are provided on a gratuitous basis, no licensed health-care provider, licensed hospital, public school, nonprofit organization, or state agency shall be liable for injuries...
Copy

Porquez v. Washington, 268 Ga. 649 (Ga. 1997).

Cited 54 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 17, 1997 | 492 S.E.2d 665, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 4162

...nd treatment given to Washington met or exceeded the standard of care of physicians generally under similar conditions and like surrounding circumstances. Dr. Clark also asserted immunity from liability as a voluntary health care provider under OCGA § 51-1-29.1. The day before the hearing on the doctors’ motions, Washington filed an amendment to his expert affidavit....
...85, 86 (377 SE2d 673) (1989); Simmons v. Boros, 255 Ga. 524, 525 (341 SE2d 2) (1986). Thus, the Court of Appeals, in its de novo review, should have determined whether the trial court’s grant of judgment in favor of Dr. Clark was warranted under OCGA § 51-1-29.1....
Copy

Porquez v. Washington, 492 S.E.2d 665 (Ga. 1997).

Cited 46 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 17, 1997 | 268 Ga. 249

...eatment given to Washington met or exceeded the *667 standard of care of physicians generally under similar conditions and like surrounding circumstances. Dr. Clark also asserted immunity from liability as a voluntary health care provider under OCGA § 51-1-29.1....
...85, 86, 377 S.E.2d 673 (1989); Simmons v. Boros, 255 Ga. 524, 525, 341 S.E.2d 2 (1986). Thus, the Court of Appeals, in its de novo review, should have determined whether the trial court's grant of judgment in favor of Dr. Clark was warranted under OCGA § 51-1-29.1....
Copy

Lutz v. Foran, 427 S.E.2d 248 (Ga. 1993).

Cited 46 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 8, 1993 | 262 Ga. 819

...rt their allegations of professional malpractice with an affidavit by an expert, and granting immunity from civil liability to health care providers who render services without pay. Ga. L. 1987 at 888-891 (codified at OCGA §§ 9-3-73; 9-11-9.1; and 51-1-29.1)....