Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §51-1-43, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 719, § 1.)
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1993, Code Section 51-1-43, as enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 1051, § 1, was redesignated as Code Section 51-1-44 and Code Section 51-1-43, as enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 1278, § 1, was redesignated as Code Section 51-1-45.
- Because a skating rink patron failed to present sufficient evidence showing that the rink owners breached a duty by failing to have identifiable floor guards on duty at the time of the patron's fall, and that the breach proximately caused the patron's injuries, but instead, the unequivocal evidence showed that a floor guard was on duty at the time of the fall, the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the owners as to the issue of their liability. Moreover, testimony from other management personnel, who were not at the rink at the time of the fall, did not contradict the assistant manager's positive assertions or written report and did not create a material issue of fact. Evans v. Sparkles Mgmt., LLC, 290 Ga. App. 458, 659 S.E.2d 860 (2008).
- 65A C.J.S., Negligence, § 133 et seq.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-11-20
Citation: 637 S.E.2d 659, 281 Ga. 273
Snippet: medical condition. See OCGA § 51-14-2(15); OCGA § 51-14-3(b). Under the express language of the Act, prima