Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 52-1-2 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 52 WATERS OF THE STATE, PORTS, AND WATERCRAFT

Section 1. General Provisions, 52-1-1 through 52-1-39.

ARTICLE 1 PROTECTION OF TIDEWATERS

52-1-2. Legislative findings and declaration of policy; public trust doctrine for tidewaters.

The General Assembly finds and declares that the State of Georgia became the owner of the beds of all tidewaters within the jurisdiction of the State of Georgia as successor to the Crown of England and by the common law.The State of Georgia continues to hold title to the beds of all tidewaters within the state, except where title in a private party can be traced to a valid Crown or state grant which explicitly conveyed the beds of such tidewaters.The General Assembly further finds that the State of Georgia, as sovereign, is trustee of the rights of the people of the state to use and enjoy all tidewaters which are capable of use for fishing, passage, navigation, commerce, and transportation, pursuant to the common law public trust doctrine. Therefore, the General Assembly declares that the protection of tidewaters for use by the state and its citizens has more than local significance, is of equal importance to all citizens of the state, is of state-wide concern, and, consequently, is properly a matter for regulation under the police powers of the state.The General Assembly further finds and declares that structures located upon tidewaters which are used as places of habitation, dwelling, sojournment, or residence interfere with the state's proprietary interest or the public trust, or both, and must be removed to ensure the rights of the state and the people of the State of Georgia to the use and enjoyment of such tidewaters.It is declared to be a policy of this state and the intent of this article to protect the tidewaters of the state by authorizing the commissioner of natural resources to remove or require removal of certain structures from such tidewaters in accordance with the procedures and within the timetable set forth in this article.

(Code 1981, §52-1-2, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 2317, § 1.)

Law reviews.

- For survey article on real property law, see 59 Mercer L. Rev. 371 (2007). For survey article on law of torts, see 59 Mercer L. Rev. 397 (2007).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Claim of private ownership not supported by illegible documents.

- Illegible and indecipherable documents did not support a claim of ownership to certain tidal marshland, and, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 52-1-2, a trial court correctly ruled that the marshland at issue was owned by the State of Georgia. Black v. Floyd, 280 Ga. 525, 630 S.E.2d 382 (2006).

Cases Citing Georgia Code 52-1-2 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 7

Black v. Floyd

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-05-17

Citation: 630 S.E.2d 382, 280 Ga. 525, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 1548, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 348

Snippet: of such tidewaters. (Emphasis supplied.) OCGA § 52-1-2. The definition of "tidewaters" includes the sea

Rouse v. Department of Natural Resources

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-11-22

Citation: 524 S.E.2d 455, 271 Ga. 726, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 4106, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 1029

Snippet: as well as statutory intent provided by OCGA § 52-1-2,[19] which also provides guidance as to the structures

Grantham Transfer Co. v. Hawes

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1969-06-12

Citation: 169 S.E.2d 290, 225 Ga. 436

Snippet: Atlanta, Georgia, and Nashville, Tennessee, tractor, 52 1/2%, tractor and trailer, 70%." This language continues

Graham v. Phinizy

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1949-01-10

Citation: 51 S.E.2d 451, 204 Ga. 638, 1949 Ga. LEXIS 468

Snippet: the plaintiffs and the defendants, ranging from 52-1/2 feet to 284-1/2 feet. After the allowance of the

Buffington v. Carter

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1945-09-05

Citation: 35 S.E.2d 440, 199 Ga. 811, 1945 Ga. LEXIS 372

Snippet: the spring in the direction of the Oconee River S 52 1/2 W 660; thence S 82 1/2 W 108; thence N 81 W 273;

Morgan v. Cooper

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1932-09-14

Citation: 175 Ga. 689, 165 S.E. 601, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 308

Snippet: net, F. 0. B. Atlanta, for Block numbers and from 52-1/2$ to 56$ net, Atlanta, for special or Cooper numbers

Blalock v. Bell

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1931-02-21

Citation: 172 Ga. 313, 157 S.E. 696, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 84

Snippet: to the widow of Ed B. Bell there still remained 52-1/2 acres of the original 105 acres which had been