Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §53-11-6, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 504, § 10; Ga. L. 1997, p. 1352, § 30; Ga. L. 1998, p. 1586, § 46.)
- For annual survey of law of wills, trusts, and administration of estates, see 38 Mercer L. Rev. 417 (1986). For article commenting on the 1997 amendment of this Code section, see 14 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 313 (1997).
This section sets forth general provisions for the waiver or acknowledgement of service or notice and the consent to any relief or order sought in a petition filed in the probate court. This section repeals the requirement of former OCGA Sec. 53-5-80 that all acknowledgements of service be attested by a notary public or the clerk of the probate court.
- It was proper to dismiss without a hearing a caveat to a will based on lack of testamentary capacity because it was clear that the caveator's allegations were fatally deficient. The caveator had not sought to set aside the probate court's order probating the will; by signing a letter of assent, the caveator had consented to the immediate probate of the will, which established, among other things, that the testator had sufficient mental capacity; and although the caveator contended that distribution of the estate should be governed by an alleged contract between the parties, the caveator had not appealed the probate court's finding that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the alleged contract. In re Estate of Brice, 288 Ga. App. 449, 654 S.E.2d 420 (2007).
- Probate court did not err in denying as untimely a child's demand for a jury trial because the child's first filing was on May 12 when the child's written and notarized acknowledgment of and assent to the petition for probate was filed with the petition for probate, and the written and notarized assent to the probate of a testator's will constituted an answer, a pleading; therefore, the child's written demand for a jury trial had to be filed by June 11, making untimely the child's demand filed on July 25. Simmons v. Harms, 287 Ga. 176, 695 S.E.2d 38 (2010).
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-05-17
Citation: 695 S.E.2d 38, 287 Ga. 176, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 1618, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 397
Snippet: granting of the relief or the order sought." OCGA § 53-11-6(b). Under the *42 statute, appellant Stockton's
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1984-03-14
Citation: 313 S.E.2d 683, 252 Ga. 279
Snippet: principle to guide us in deciding the issue. OCGA § 53-11-6 (Code Ann. § 113-2907) directs that "[t]his chapter