Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448When the construction of an express trust is at issue, the court may hear parol evidence of the circumstances surrounding the settlor at the time of the execution of the trust and parol evidence to explain all ambiguities, both latent and patent.
(Code 1981, §53-12-27, enacted by Ga. L. 2010, p. 579, § 1/SB 131.)
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former O.C.G.A. § 53-12-27 of the 1991 Trust Act are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Word "foundation" as used in a trust was ambiguous as the settlor did not establish a foundation at the time of the settlor's death and it could not be determined whether the settlor had a charitable intent; thus, the trial court should have considered parol evidence under former O.C.G.A. § 53-12-27 (see O.C.G.A. § 53-12-27) to explain the ambiguity and to determine the settlor's intent. Baker v. Merrill Lynch Trust Co., 286 Ga. App. 767, 650 S.E.2d 296 (2007), cert. denied, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 810 (Ga. 2007) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 53-12-27).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-07-05
Citation: 392 S.E.2d 870, 260 Ga. 356
Snippet: 169, 171 (244 SE2d 46) (1978); OCGA §§ 53-12-26; 53-12-27. A resulting trust is based on the presumed intention