O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 53-2-23 (2019)

Superior court procedure

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Upon the filing in a superior court of a petition described in Code Section 53-2-21 or 53-2-22, service on the parties in interest shall be effected in the same manner as prescribed in cases in which equitable relief is sought; and the case shall thereafter proceed to judgment in the manner provided for such cases by the rules of practice in the superior courts.

History

Code 1981, § 53-2-23, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 504, § 10.

Annotations

COMMENT This section carries forward former OCGA Sec. 53-4-33. RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 23 Am. Jur. 2d, Descent and Distribution, § 115. 27A Am. Jur. 2d, Equity, § 13 et seq.

C.J.S. - 26B C.J.S., Descent and Distribution, § 82.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1997–1997 · leading case: Joseph v. Grisham, 482 S.E.2d 251 (Ga. 1997).
Joseph v. Grisham, 482 S.E.2d 251 (Ga. 1997). · cites it 2× “In support of their contention that the evidence presents a question of fact on the issue of monomania, the caveators rely on OCGA § 53-2-23: “A monomaniac may make a will if the will is in no way the result of or connected with his monomania.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.