Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §53-2-41, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 504, § 10.)
- For article discussing methods of summary distribution and settlement of decedent's estate, see 6 Ga. L. Rev. 74 (1971).
This section carries over the paragraphs (b) through (e) of former OCGA Sec. 53-10-2 and Sec. 53-10-3. Paragraph (a) of OCGA Sec. 53-10-2 is now encompassed in Chapter 11 of this Title. The remaining paragraphs of former OCGA Sec. 53-10-2 have been modified to reflect that the heirs for whom a guardian or a personal representative has been appointed may consent to an order dispensing with administration and to clarify that the order dispensing with administration has the effect of vesting title in the heirs in accordance with the state's laws of intestate distribution or, if different, the agreement set forth by the heirs as a part of their petition.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under Ga. L. 1959, p. 111, § 1, and former O.C.G.A. § 53-10-2 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Ordinary (now probate judge) is not required to make finding as to agreement for division or to incorporate any reference to it in the ordinary's order. Saturday v. Saturday, 113 Ga. App. 251, 147 S.E.2d 798 (1966) (decided under Ga. L. 1959, p. 111, § 1).
- Duty of an heir opposing a petition for an order dispensing with administration to file a counteraffidavit in opposition to a motion for summary judgment on the petition arises only after the movant has made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment. Echols v. Hudson, 189 Ga. App. 780, 377 S.E.2d 542 (1989) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 53-10-2).
- Fact questions, precluding summary judgment on a petition for an order dispensing with administration, existed since the record showed only that there was an estate consisting of a checking account and unidentified household furnishings, that there were debts owed by the decedent, and that the heirs had not agreed amicably to a division of the assets. Echols v. Hudson, 189 Ga. App. 780, 377 S.E.2d 542 (1989) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 53-10-2).
Cited in Michael v. Poss, 209 Ga. 559, 74 S.E.2d 742 (1953); Shadburn v. Tapp, 209 Ga. 887, 77 S.E.2d 7 (1953); Robbins v. Riales, 221 Ga. 225, 144 S.E.2d 80 (1965); Hayes v. Strickland, 112 Ga. App. 567, 145 S.E.2d 728 (1965); Babb v. Potts, 183 Ga. App. 785, 360 S.E.2d 44 (1987).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under Ga. L. 1959, p. 111, § 1, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Taxes are debts for purposes of this statute. 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U71-58 (decided under Ga. L. 1959, p. 111, § 1).
- 31 Am. Jur. 2d, Executors and Administrators, §§ 1, 11 et seq., 21, 48.
- 26B C.J.S., Descent and Distribution, §§ 74, 75, 78, 81, 112 et seq. 33 C.J.S., Executors and Administrators, §§ 7, 8, 11, 13.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-09-09
Citation: 257 Ga. 361, 359 S.E.2d 885, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 854
Snippet: anything vested immediately in Mrs. Tingle. OCGA § 53-2-41 (b) turns the issue on the matter of intent by