Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448The right of a surviving spouse or minor child to year's support from the estate of a decedent shall be barred by a sale or conveyance made prior to the award of year's support by the personal representative of the estate under authority of a court of competent jurisdiction or under power in a will; provided, however, that the sale or conveyance shall bar year's support and rights to year's support only as to the property sold or conveyed.
(Code 1981, §53-3-13, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 504, § 10.)
This section carries forward former OCGA Sec. 53-5-14.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under Ga. L. 1972, p. 731, § 1, and former O.C.G.A. § 53-5-14 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Property of a decedent may be sold free from a year's support only under the provisions of this statute by a sale or conveyance made under court order or under power contained in a will by the representative prior to the setting apart of such year's support. Knowles v. Knowles, 125 Ga. App. 642, 188 S.E.2d 800 (1972) (decided under Ga. L. 1972, p. 731, § 1).
Widow's application for year's support is not barred by executor's deed of assent as to the property conveyed therein by operation of this statute. Anderson v. Groover, 242 Ga. 50, 247 S.E.2d 851 (1978) (decided under Ga. L. 1972, p. 731, § 1).
An executor's assent to devise does not come within the meaning of this statute, which was intended to offer protection to third-party purchasers of property in an estate against claims for year's support, and was not intended to exempt devises and legacies from year's support. Anderson v. Groover, 242 Ga. 50, 247 S.E.2d 851 (1978) (decided under Ga. L. 1972, p. 731, § 1).
Widow of the decedent was entitled to a year's support since the estate still contained over $45,000.00 and no action had been taken by the executor to obtain the court's permission to distribute those funds to the minor child of the decedent; the executor's attempt to designate the funds for the minor by purchasing a cashier's check after the application was filed by the widow was of no avail. Evans v. Evans, 236 Ga. App. 896, 514 S.E.2d 74 (1999) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 53-5-14).
- 31 Am. Jur. 2d, Executors and Administrators, §§ 324, 326, 327.
- 34 C.J.S., Executors and Administrators, §§ 453, 456, 459, 465.
Total Results: 4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-01-23
Citation: 290 Ga. 433, 722 S.E.2d 49, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 194, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 93
Snippet: blind, incompetent, or inaccessible.” OCGA § 53-3-13 (a) (1997) (current version at OCGA § 53-5-21 (2011))
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-09-20
Citation: 700 S.E.2d 367, 287 Ga. 789, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3025, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 604
Snippet: a will is a legally protected interest, OCGA § 53-3-13 "requires the propounder of any will to *370 give
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-02-28
Citation: 400 S.E.2d 925, 260 Ga. 866
Snippet: In McKnight v. Boggs we held that former OCGA § 53-3-13 was unconstitutional because it did not require
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1984-11-16
Citation: 322 S.E.2d 283, 253 Ga. 537, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 1029
Snippet: Superior Court declaring unconstitutional OCGA § 53-3-13, which requires that notice to probate a will in