Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(b) The affidavit shall be evidenced by a certificate, affixed with the official seal of the notary public, that is attached or annexed to the will or codicil, in form and content substantially as follows:
STATE OF GEORGIA COUNTY of ____________ Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared ____________ , ____________ , and ____________ , known to me to be the testator and the witnesses, respectively, whose names are subscribed to the annexed or foregoing instrument in their respective capacities, and all of said individuals being by me duly sworn, ____________ , testator, declared to me and to the witnesses in my presence that said instrument is the last will and testament or a codicil to the last will and testament of the testator and that the testator had willingly made and executed it as a free act and deed for the purposes expressed therein. The witnesses, each on oath, stated to me in the presence and hearing of the testator that the testator had declared to them that the instrument is the testator's last will and testament or a codicil to the testator's last will and testament and that the testator executed the instrument as such and wished each of them to sign it as a witness; and under oath each witness stated further that the witness had signed the same as witness in the presence of the testator and at the testator's request; that the testator was 14 years of age or over and of sound mind; and that each of the witnesses was then at least 14 years of age. __________________________________________________________________ Testator __________________________________________________________________ Witness __________________________________________________________________ Witness Sworn to and subscribed before me by ____________ , testator, and sworn to and subscribed before me by ____________ and ____________ , witnesses, this ________ day of _____________ , ______ . (SEAL) (Signed) ______________________________ (Official Capacity of Officer)
A self-proved will or codicil may be admitted to probate without the testimony of any subscribing witness, but otherwise it shall be treated no differently from a will or codicil that is not self-proved. In particular, without limiting the generality of the foregoing sentence, a self-proved will or codicil may be contested, revoked, or amended in exactly the same fashion as a will or codicil that is not self-proved.
(Code 1981, §53-4-24, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 504, § 10; Ga. L. 1999, p. 81, § 53.)
- For annual survey of law of wills, trusts, guardianships, and fiduciary administration, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 457 (2004).
This section combines and carries over former OCGA Sec. 53-2-40.1 and portions of former OCGA Sec. 53-2-5. The self-proving procedure described in this section is available for both wills and codicils. See Code Sec. 53-11-7 for an explanation of the term "notary public," which is used in subsection (a).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former O.C.G.A. § 53-2-40.1 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Even though the testator did not sign the last page of the will relating to the disposition of the testator's estate, the will was valid since the testator's signature appeared on the next page, the self-proving affidavit. Hickox v. Wilson, 269 Ga. 180, 496 S.E.2d 711 (1998) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 53-2-40.1)
Trial court erred in granting summary judgment pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 9-11-56 to will caveators in a will propounder's action seeking to probate a decedent's will since the decedent had sufficiently signed the will on the signature line of the self-proving clause, pursuant to former O.C.G.A. § 53-2-40.1, and there existed two competent witness signatures which were sufficient for attestation purposes; accordingly, the statutory requirements for proper execution of a will under former O.C.G.A. § 53-2-40 appeared to have been met and a jury issue was raised as to whether, in fact, the requirements were met. Miles v. Bryant, 277 Ga. 362, 589 S.E.2d 86 (2003) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 53-2-40.1)
- Under O.C.G.A. § 53-4-24(c), when a will is self-proved, it "may be admitted to probate without the testimony of any subscribing witness." In fact, compliance with the requirements of execution are presumed without the live testimony or affidavits of witnesses; that is, under O.C.G.A. § 53-5-21(a), the affidavit creates a presumption regarding the prima facie case, subject to rebuttal. Singelman v. Singelman, 273 Ga. 894, 548 S.E.2d 343 (2001).
Self-proving affidavit attached to a testator's will created a rebuttable presumption that the signature and attestation requirements were met and allowed the will to be admitted into evidence without the testimony of the witnesses to the will or other proof that the formalities for the will's execution were met. Duncan v. Moore, 275 Ga. 656, 571 S.E.2d 771 (2002).
In a sister's challenge to her brother's will, the probate court erred in finding that the will was not sufficiently proven due to the executor's failure to produce the witnesses; the will had an attached self-proving affidavit and could be admitted without other proof that formalities of execution were met, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 53-4-24. Reeves v. Webb, 297 Ga. 405, 774 S.E.2d 641 (2015).
Cited in Tuttle v. Ryan, 282 Ga. 652, 653 S.E.2d 50 (2007).
Total Results: 11
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-10-30
Citation: 302 Ga. 494, 807 S.E.2d 339
Snippet: they contained affidavits complying with OCGA § 53-4-24. As a result, Caveators admitted that a presumption
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-29
Snippet: (1) (285 SE2d 910) (1982). Furthermore, OCGA § 53-4- 24 provides for self-proved wills and codicils, stating
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-29
Citation: 297 Ga. 405, 774 S.E.2d 641
Snippet: (1) (285 SE2d 910) (1982). Furthermore, OCGA § 53-4-24 provides for self-proved wills and codicils, stating
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-09-09
Citation: 293 Ga. 538, 748 S.E.2d 412, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2811, 2013 WL 4779547, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 645
Snippet: requirements of a self-proving affidavit under OCGA § 53-4-24, we reverse the superior court’s conclusion to
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-01-10
Citation: 704 S.E.2d 789, 288 Ga. 443, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 50, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 7
Snippet: similar in form to the example set out in OCGA § 53-4-24(b) and met the requirements of an affidavit as
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-01-28
Citation: 283 Ga. 54, 656 S.E.2d 834, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 220, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 34
Snippet: not a self-proving will as authorized by OCGA § 53-4-24. There is a dispute in the evidence as to whether
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-11-05
Citation: 282 Ga. 652, 653 S.E.2d 50, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3375, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 842
Snippet: and witnessed the self-proved will, see OCGA § 53-4-24, an associate who also witnessed Ryan’s execution
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-11-17
Citation: 589 S.E.2d 86, 277 Ga. 362, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 3395, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 1002
Snippet: Notary Public [Notary stamp affixed] OCGA § 53-4-24. Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (405 SE2d
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2002-10-28
Citation: 571 S.E.2d 771, 275 Ga. 656
Snippet: witnesses to the will, and a notary public. See OCGA § 53-4-24. The self-proving affidavit, which is a sworn statement
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-07-05
Citation: 549 S.E.2d 113, 274 Ga. 172, 2001 Ga. LEXIS 568
Snippet: continuing viability of the case law." [2] OCGA § 53-4-24 of the revised probate code carries over former
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-06-11
Citation: 548 S.E.2d 343, 273 Ga. 894, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 1852, 2001 Ga. LEXIS 443
Snippet: offered by Singelmann as self-proving.[3] See OCGA § 53-4-24; Hickox v. Wilson, 269 Ga. 180, 496 S.E.2d 711