Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448When it appears that a will cannot be proved as otherwise provided by law because at the time the will is offered for probate one or more of the subscribing witnesses to the will is dead or mentally or physically incapable of testifying or otherwise inaccessible, the court may admit the will to probate in common or solemn form upon the testimony in person or by affidavit or by deposition of at least two credible disinterested witnesses that the signature to the will is that of the individual whose will it purports to be or upon other sufficient proof of such signature. This Code section shall not preclude the court, in its discretion, from requiring, in addition, the testimony in person or by deposition of any available subscribing witness or proof of such other pertinent facts and circumstances as the court may deem necessary to admit the will to probate.
(Code 1981, §53-5-24, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 504, § 10.)
This section carries forward the substance of former OCGA Sec. 53-3-18.
- Although the witnesses to a will were deceased, the lawyer who prepared the will and the lawyer's paralegal were not permitted to testify that the signature on the will was the decedent's because the lawyer and paralegal did not demonstrate a familiarity with the decedent's signature. Ammons v. Clouds, 295 Ga. 225, 758 S.E.2d 282 (2014).
Cited in Harvey v. Sullivan, 272 Ga. 392, 529 S.E.2d 889 (2000).
- 80 Am. Jur. 2d, Wills, § 853.
- 95 C.J.S., Wills, §§ 616 et seq., 626, 661 et seq.
Total Results: 4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-05-05
Citation: 295 Ga. 225, 758 S.E.2d 282, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 1261, 2014 WL 1765944, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 350
Snippet: deceased. Propounders sought to invoke OCGA § 53-5-24, under which, when a witness to a will is not available
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-01-23
Citation: 290 Ga. 433, 722 S.E.2d 49, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 194, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 93
Snippet: OCGA § 53-3-18 (1997) (current version at OCGA § 53-5-24 (2011)); see Harvey v. Sullivan, 272 Ga. 392 (2)
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-10-19
Citation: 684 S.E.2d 654, 286 Ga. 185
Snippet: thereby making them unavailable under OCGA § 53-5-24 and authorizing the jury to consider other evidence
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2000-05-08
Citation: 529 S.E.2d 889, 272 Ga. 392, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 1732, 2000 Ga. LEXIS 388
Snippet: without being completed. In accordance with OCGA § 53-5-24[1], the propounder put on a series of witnesses