O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 53-7-16 (2019)

Joint and several liability of personal representative and sureties

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The personal representative and sureties shall be held and deemed joint and several obligors and may be subjected jointly and severally to liability in the same action. When a personal representative removes beyond the limits of this state, dies and leaves an unrepresented estate, or is in such a position that an attachment may be issued as against a debtor, any party in interest or any person having demands against that personal representative in the personal representative’s representative capacity may institute an action against the sureties or any one or more of them upon the bond of the personal representative in the first instance, without first obtaining a judgment against the personal representative in that person’s representative capacity. No prior judgment establishing the liability of the personal representative or a devastavit by the personal representative shall be necessary before an action is brought against the sureties on the bond.

History

Code 1981, § 53-7-16, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 504, § 10.

Annotations

COMMENT This section combines the provisions of former OCGA Secs. 53-7-39 and 53-7-46.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Editor’s notes. - In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former O.C.G.A. § 53-7-39 are included in the annotations for this Code section. Litigation costs paid from estate assets. - Following an unsuccessful claim for estate mismanagement brought by beneficiaries of an estate against the

administrator and the administrator’s bonding company, litigation costs incurred by the company, pursuant to an indemnity clause in the bond application of the administrator, should be paid from estate assets. Fowler v. Smith, 243 Ga. App. 469, 533 S.E.2d 739 (2000) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 53-7-39).