Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448When litigation against the estate is pending or is threatened or when notice of a claim has been given to the personal representative, the personal representative may demand that the heirs or beneficiaries give refunding bonds to indemnify the personal representative against the claims. Upon the failure of the heirs or beneficiaries to give such bonds, the personal representative may reserve enough of the assets to respond to the claims.
(Code 1981, §53-7-66, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 504, § 10.)
This section carries forward former OCGA Sec. 53-7-168, without the last sentence of that former Code section, which prohibited an executor or administrator from demanding a refunding bond from a distributee or legatee when no threatened action rendered the bond necessary.
- 31 Am. Jur. 2d, Executors and Administrators, §§ 915, 917, 919, 983.
- 34 C.J.S., Executors and Administrators, § 608.
(Code 1981, §53-7-67, enacted by Ga. L. 1996, p. 504, § 10.)
- For article, "Fiduciary Problems of the Executor and Trustee: Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Fiduciary Duties, Surcharge, and Other Remedies of Beneficiaries," see 9 Ga. St. B.J. 187 (1972).
This section carries forward former OCGA Sec. 53-7-180.
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under Ga. L. 1943, p. 409, § 1, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- There was no abuse of discretion in the probate court's removal of an administrator based on findings that the administrator failed to file timely and proper annual returns. In re Estate of Jackson, 241 Ga. App. 392, 526 S.E.2d 884 (1999).
Annual returns which do not substantially comply with the law are not prima facie proof in favor of the administrator. If they are allowed by the ordinary (now probate judge) and recorded, under the terms of the statute, anyone challenging their correctness must carry the burden of proving their incorrectness. But when the returns are not allowed by the ordinary (now probate judge), the burden is upon the administrator to prove the returns' correctness in a proceeding in the court of ordinary (now probate court) for an accounting and settlement. Ellis v. McWilliams, 70 Ga. App. 195, 27 S.E.2d 886 (1943) ??? (decided under Ga. L. 1943, p. 409, § 1).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under former O.C.G.A. § 53-7-180 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Banks, acting as guardians and administrators of estates, need not file originals or copies of vouchers with their returns if the banks file an affidavit stating that the original vouchers have been compared to each item on the return and that the return is correct. 1983 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U83-34 (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 53-7-180).
- 31 Am. Jur. 2d, Executors and Administrators, §§ 488, 489, 867, 872 et seq., 877.
- 34 C.J.S., Executors and Administrators, § 995.
No results found for Georgia Code 53-7-66.