Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Where the department by rule, regulation, or written policy has provided for expedited processing of applications or for notice procedures, it may abbreviate its review of these criteria.
(Code 1933, § 13-203.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1960, p. 67, § 5; Ga. L. 1963, p. 602, § 2; Ga. L. 1970, p. 954, § 4; Ga. L. 1973, p. 127, § 1; Ga. L. 1975, p. 473, § 1; Ga. L. 1978, p. 1710, § 3; Ga. L. 1978, p. 2068, § 1; Ga. L. 1980, p. 1082, § 1; Ga. L. 1983, p. 602, § 14; Ga. L. 1999, p. 674, § 17; Ga. L. 2000, p. 174, § 13; Ga. L. 2016, p. 390, § 2-13/HB 811.)
The 2016 amendment, effective July 1, 2016, deleted the former last sentence of subsection (b), which read: "Under normal circumstances and workload, the department will issue an approval or disapproval of a branch office within 21 days or after the end of the public comment period, whichever is later."
- For article discussing compliance with Federal Securities Act of 1933 in bank acquisitions and the issuance of securities of bank holding companies, see 14 Ga. St. B.J. 114 (1978). For annual survey of law of business associations, see 43 Mercer L. Rev. 85 (1991). For comment on United States v. Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank, 422 U.S. 86, 95 S. Ct. 2099, 45 L. Ed. 2d 41 (1975), see 10 Ga. L. Rev. 641 (1976).
- Term "branch bank", as used in O.C.G.A. § 7-1-602(e), is not necessarily interchangeable with "bank." Community Bankers Ass'n v. First Nat'l Bank of Commerce, 193 Ga. App. 569, 388 S.E.2d 387 (1989), aff'd, 260 Ga. 371, 394 S.E.2d 95 (1990).
- To determine whether a bank facility is a branch office, the court should look to four pertinent factual criteria; i.e., distance separating main banking house and the facility, number of intervening structures, lack of physical connection between main banking house and the facility, and the economic effect of the facility on the balance of competition between area banks. Dunn v. First Nat'l Bank, 345 F. Supp. 853 (N.D. Ga. 1972).
- Although a bank holding company may change the corporate structure of the company's banking subsidiaries through merger, consolidation, or purchase, and may continue all of the banking activities of the component banks, a bank holding company may not, through the company's banking subsidiary, acquire "branch banks" and continue to operate those branches as such. First Nat'l Bank of Commerce v. Community Bankers Ass'n, 260 Ga. 371, 394 S.E.2d 95 (1990).
- Nothing in the Code expresses or implies any intent to permit approval of a bank holding company's merging or consolidating with, or acquiring control of, a branch bank by itself without merging or consolidating with, or acquiring control of, the entire bank. Community Bankers Ass'n v. First Nat'l Bank of Commerce, 193 Ga. App. 569, 388 S.E.2d 387 (1989), aff'd, 260 Ga. 371, 394 S.E.2d 95 (1990).
Cited in Jackson v. First Nat'l Bank, 246 F. Supp. 134 (M.D. Ga. 1965); Jackson v. First Nat'l Bank, 292 F. Supp. 156 (N.D. Ga. 1968); United States v. Citizens & S. Nat'l Bank, 422 U.S. 86, 95 S. Ct. 2099, 45 L. Ed. 2d 41 (1975).
Legislative intent behind former Code 1933, § 13-203.1 was to provide for establishment and operation of new and additional bank offices and bank facilities. 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 71-102.
- Former Code 1933, § 13-203.1 empowered the superintendent of banks, (now commissioner of banking and finance) to regulate the establishment of bank offices and bank facilities and to provide for criteria of examination and determination of public need and advantage in establishment of bank offices and bank facilities. 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 71-102.
- Georgia law does not prohibit a bank from establishing multiple bank offices or bank facilities, using a single mobile bank unit on a regular part-time basis. 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-106.
- For purpose of applying state law to parent office of national bank established on military reservation, the controlling geographical entity is the county, not the military reservation. 1975 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 75-141.
- When two national banks whose parent banks are located in one county each have a branch bank in another county, even though it is on a military reservation, those banks may establish and operate additional offices in that first county off the military reservation. 1975 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 75-141.
- Place of banking business which is located within the county in which is located the principal office of the bank, and which was formerly a lawfully established branch bank within the meaning of former Code 1933, § 13-201.1 (see now O.C.G.A. § 7-1-600(5) is for purposes of former Code 1933, §§ 13-203 and 13-203.1 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 7-1-601 and7-1-602) to be treated as a bank office as defined by former Code 1933, § 13-201.1 (see now O.C.G.A. § 7-1-600(4)). 1974 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 74-35.
- When a brokerage firm, in operating an investment program in conjunction with a bank, is performing the firm's functions primarily for the firm's own benefit, it is in no sense a mere adjunct of the participating bank, and the program does not result in the operation of branches, offices, or facilities by the participating bank in violation of O.C.G.A. §§ 7-1-601 and7-1-602. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 81-59.
- Power of banking corporation to loan money for others, 33 A.L.R. 597.
Branch banks, 50 A.L.R. 1340; 136 A.L.R. 471.
What is a "branch bank" within statutes regulating the establishment of branch banks, 23 A.L.R.3d 683.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-07-16
Citation: 394 S.E.2d 95, 260 Ga. 371
Snippet: holding is mandated by an interpretation of OCGA §§ 7-1-602 (e) and 7-1-606 (e) in pari materia. In my opinion