O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 7-1-910 (2019)
Purpose
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
It is the purpose of this article to require certain reports and records of transactions involving United States currency where such reports and records have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, or regulatory investigations or proceedings.
History
Code 1981, § 7-1-910, enacted by Ga. L. 1982, p. 2219, § 1.
Annotations
JUDICIAL DECISIONS Applicability. - O.C.G.A. § 7-1-910 was not applicable in an action alleging that a bank improperly cashed certificates of deposit and a savings account. Emmett
v. Regions Bank, 238 Ga. App. 455, 518 S.E.2d 472, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 778 (1999), cert. denied, No. S99C1430, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 879 (Ga. Oct. 22, 1999).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1999–1999 · leading case: Emmett v. Regions Bank, 518 S.E.2d 472 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).
Emmett v. Regions Bank, 518 S.E.2d 472 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). “The Emmetts assert the trial court erred in implicitly holding that Regions Bank did not have to retain original certificates and withdrawal slips, arguing that OCGA § 7-1-910 requires banks to maintain certain records.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.