
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448A continuance requested by a party in a pending case in any court shall not be granted for longer than one term.
(Laws 1799, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 486; Code 1863, § 3448; Code 1868, § 3468; Code 1873, § 3519; Code 1882, § 3519; Civil Code 1895, § 5126; Civil Code 1910, § 5710; Code 1933, § 81-1401.)
- Corresponding provision relating to criminal procedure, § 17-8-37.
Discretion in refusing continuance was not abused where continuance had been granted at two previous terms and for one day at the third term. Camp v. Lanier, 36 Ga. App. 54, 135 S.E. 224 (1926).
- It was not error for the court to put the case on terms and limit the continuances of the defendant, where it appeared that the defendant had been granted five continuances. Alley v. Gormley, 181 Ga. 650, 183 S.E. 787 (1935).
- Under the circumstances, no abuse of discretion of the judge in refusing to grant a continuance because of alleged providential absence of a party by sickness, was shown. Dyar v. Dyar, 55 Ga. App. 226, 189 S.E. 721 (1937).
Cited in Odom v. Attaway, 41 Ga. App. 51, 152 S.E. 148 (1930).
Database error: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 8 attempt to write a readonly database
This Georgia Code resource is curated by this site's author, a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Title 9 in the context of Georgia civil practice and statute of limitations and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida and South Georgia. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.