O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 9-10-32 (2019)

Action against maker and endorser residing in different counties

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Where the maker and endorser of a promissory note who reside in different counties are subjected to an action in the county where the maker resides, as provided by Article VI, Section II, Paragraph V of the Constitution of this state, service of a copy of the original pleading and process on the endorser, as provided in the case of joint obligors and promisors, shall be deemed sufficient.

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 3266; Code 1868, § 3277; Code 1873, § 3353; Code 1882, § 3353; Civil Code 1895, § 5012; Civil Code 1910, § 5594; Code 1933, § 3-303; Ga. L. 1983, p. 3, § 48.

Annotations

Cross references. Form of complaint on promissory note, § 9-11-103.

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 62B Am. Jur. 2d, Process, § 43. 77 Am. Jur. 2d, Venue, §§ 29, 34.

C.J.S. 72 C.J.S., Process, §§ 8, 124, 133 et seq.