Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 9-11-52 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 9 CIVIL PRACTICE

Section 11. Civil Practice Act, 9-11-1 through 9-11-133.

ARTICLE 6 TRIALS

9-11-52. Findings by the court.

ARTICLE 7 JUDGMENT

9-11-58. Entry of judgment; judge's name to be typed, printed, or stamped after signature; filing of civil case disposition form.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 9-11-52 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 20

Capote v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-10-31

Snippet: Assembly enacting in 1969 a predecessor to OCGA § 9-11-52, which provided in part that “[f]indings of fact

Wallace v. Wallace

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-05-15

Citation: 301 Ga. 195, 800 S.E.2d 303, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 379

Snippet: state separately its conclusions of law.” OCGA § 9-11-52 (a). One reason for that requirement is that it

Savage v. State of Georgia

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-29

Citation: 297 Ga. 627, 774 S.E.2d 624

Snippet: post-judgment motion for such findings, see OCGA § 9-11-52 (c), and he therefore waived review of this complaint

Wallace v. Wallace

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-11-24

Citation: 296 Ga. 307, 766 S.E.2d 452, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 939

Snippet: trial court’s failure, under authority of OCGA § 9-11-52 (a), to make findings of fact and conclusions of

Henderson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-06-16

Citation: 295 Ga. 333, 759 S.E.2d 827, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 1532, 2014 WL 2702661, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 492

Snippet: fact is without merit. Appellant relies on OCGA § 9-11-52 (a) to argue that findings of fact were necessary

Rose v. Rose

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-03-03

Citation: 294 Ga. 719, 755 S.E.2d 737, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 344, 2014 WL 819507, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 180

Snippet: Ga. App. 820, 821 (589 SE2d 602) (2003); OCGA § 9-11-52. 3. Wife contends the case was not ripe for

Gwinnett County v. McManus

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-03-03

Citation: 294 Ga. 702, 755 S.E.2d 720

Snippet: cannot say it is clearly erroneous. See OCGA § 9-11-52 (a) (“In ruling on interlocutory injunctions .

Arthur v. Arthur

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-05-20

Citation: 293 Ga. 63, 743 S.E.2d 420, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1547, 2013 WL 2150858, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 453

Snippet: response to Husband’s request made pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-52; and whether the trial court erred in its division

Driver v. Driver

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-04-15

Citation: 292 Ga. 800, 741 S.E.2d 631, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1214, 2013 WL 1499418, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 327

Snippet: and/or make additional findings pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-52. On July 11, 2012, the trial court denied those

Wang v. Liu

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-03-18

Citation: 292 Ga. 568, 740 S.E.2d 136, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 605, 2013 WL 1092677, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 254

Snippet: order to ask for an explained decision. Cf. OCGA § 9-11-52 (a) (findings and conclusions in rulings on interlocutory

Hunter v. Hunter

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2011-03-25

Citation: 709 S.E.2d 263, 289 Ga. 9, 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 925, 2011 Ga. LEXIS 268

Snippet: findings of fact and conclusions of law under OCGA § 9-11-52(c). "A trial court presiding over a bench trial

Cook v. Smith

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-11-22

Citation: 705 S.E.2d 847, 288 Ga. 409, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 4057, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 887

Snippet: law contained in the judgment pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-52. (Footnote omitted.) City of East Point v. Jordan

Holloway v. Holloway

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-11-01

Citation: 702 S.E.2d 132, 288 Ga. 147, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 3471, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 834

Snippet: a decision by the court thereon. Under OCGA § 9-11-52(c), a motion for new trial may be used in addition

DeKalb County v. Perdue

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-22

Citation: 692 S.E.2d 331, 286 Ga. 793, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 870, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 267

Snippet: unincorporated areas of DeKalb County. See generally OCGA § 9-11-52(a). 3. Appellant argues that voter approval of

Kuriatnyk v. Kuriatnyk

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-01

Citation: 690 S.E.2d 397, 286 Ga. 589, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 521, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 183

Snippet: 643, 644(1), 651 S.E.2d 736 (2007). Under OCGA § 9-11-52(c), "`[a] motion for new trial may be used in addition

American Lien Fund, LLC v. Dixon

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-01

Citation: 690 S.E.2d 415, 286 Ga. 562, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 535, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 178

Snippet: findings of fact and conclusions of law, see OCGA § 9-11-52(a), and thus it fails to demonstrate error. See

East Georgia Land & Development Co. v. Baker

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-01-25

Citation: 690 S.E.2d 145, 286 Ga. 551, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 163, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 86

Snippet: judge the credibility of the witnesses." OCGA § 9-11-52(a). And at a bench trial, the trial court's ruling

Nelson v. GEORGIA SHERIFFS YOUTH HOMES, INC.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-11-23

Citation: 686 S.E.2d 663, 286 Ga. 192, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3639, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 725

Snippet: 227 Ga.App. 186(1), 489 S.E.2d 58 (1997); OCGA § 9-11-52(a)), the special procedures of the Quiet Title

Pipkin v. Boggs

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-05-14

Citation: 644 S.E.2d 861, 282 Ga. 20, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 1452, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 344

Snippet: W.3d 490, 496 (Tenn.Ct.App. 2005). [2] OCGA § 9-11-52(a) ("In ruling on interlocutory injunctions .

Mathis v. Mathis

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-03-26

Citation: 642 S.E.2d 832, 281 Ga. 865, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 1372, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 251

Snippet: prior to the entry of the written judgment (OCGA § 9-11-52(a); Payson v. Payson, supra, 274 Ga. 231(2), 552