O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 9-11-70 (2019)

Judgment for specific acts; vesting title

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Statute text

A decree for specific performance shall operate as a deed to convey land or other property without any conveyance being executed by the vendor. The decree, certified by the clerk, shall be recorded in the registry of deeds in the county where the land lies and shall stand in the place of a deed. In all other cases where a judgment directs a party to perform other specific acts and the party fails to comply within the time specified, the court may direct the acts to be done at the cost of the disobedient party by some other person appointed by the court; and acts when so done have like effect as if done by the party. The court may also in proper cases adjudge the party in contempt. If real or personal property is within the state, the court in lieu of directing a conveyance thereof may enter a judgment divesting the title of any party and vesting it in others; and the judgment has the effect of a conveyance executed in due form of law. When any order or judgment is for the delivery of possession, the party in whose favor it is entered is entitled to a writ of execution upon oral or written application to the clerk.

History

(Ga. L. 1966, p. 609, § 70.)

Annotations

U.S. Code. - For provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 70, and annotations pertaining thereto, see 28 U.S.C.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Divorce decree placing title to property in wife is just as valid as deed from husband would have been. Elrod v. Elrod, 231 Ga. 222, 200 S.E.2d 885 (1973).

Decree granting a life estate in property took precedence over quitclaim deed. - Husband's quitclaim deed of property to his second wife did not take priority over a recorded divorce decree stating that the husband had only a life estate in the property with his two children from his first marriage as remaindermen. Price v. Price, 286 Ga. 753, 692 S.E.2d 601 (2010).

Definite description of property required. - Decree for specific performance operates as a deed and should therefore contain a description as definite as that required to support a deed. Plantation Land Co. v. Bradshaw, 232 Ga. 435, 207 S.E.2d 49 (1974); Scheinfeld v. Murray, 267 Ga. 622, 481 S.E.2d 194 (1997).

Because there was no clear identification of the land to be conveyed in a parents' divorce settlement, their son was not entitled to a decree of specific performance under O.C.G.A. § 9-11-70. Haffner v. Davis, 290 Ga. 753, 725 S.E.2d 286 (2012).

Suit for specific performance is prematurely brought when time for performance has not yet arrived. Kirkland v. Morris, 233 Ga. 597, 212 S.E.2d 781 (1975).

Superior court order reconveying land to a vendor under an option to repurchase is not one of specific performance and does not act as a deed to convey when the order makes the reconveyance of the land contingent on a sum of money being paid into the court registry. The court's order does not become a decree of specific performance until the contingency is met. Nelson v. Smothers, 168 Ga. App. 120, 308 S.E.2d 239 (1983).

Cited in McMichael Realty & Ins. Agency, Inc. v. Tysinger, 155 Ga. App. 131, 270 S.E.2d 88 (1980); Bootery, Inc. v. Cumberland Creek Properties, Inc., 271 Ga. 271, 517 S.E.2d 68 (1999).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d. - 71 Am. Jur. 2d, Specific Performance, § 134 et seq.

C.J.S. - 35B C.J.S., Federal Civil Procedure, §§ 1307, 1309. 81A C.J.S., Specific Performance, §§ 1 et seq., 128 et seq.

ALR. - Rights and remedies respecting improvements made in reliance on a decree or order as to title or possession of real property which is subsequently reversed, 30 A.L.R. 936.

Reversal as affecting purchase of property involved in suit, pending appeal without supersedeas, 36 A.L.R. 421.

Inability to comply with judgment or order as defense to charge of contempt, 120 A.L.R. 703.

Judgment in replevin as implying a direction for return of property, 144 A.L.R. 1149.

——————————

ARTICLE 9
GENERAL PROVISIONS

9-11-71 through 9-11-77. Reserved.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1983–2017 · leading case: Davis v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 673 S.E.2d 221 (Ga. 2009).
Davis v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 673 S.E.2d 221 (Ga. 2009). · cites it 2× “On July 15, 2005, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”), as assignee of Ameriquest, filed a complaint against Sondra Davis and Ronda Davis on the loan, sought judicial foreclosure on the property, a decree of specific performance vesting title in Deutsche Bank…”
Haffner v. Davis, 725 S.E.2d 286 (Ga. 2012). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 9-11-70. Because it operates as a deed, a decree for specific performance must contain a description as definite as that required to support a deed.”
Scheinfeld v. Murray, 481 S.E.2d 194 (Ga. 1997). · cites it 2× “Because a decree for specific performance operates as a deed (OCGA § 9-11-70), the description in the decree should be as definite as that required for a deed.”
Price v. Price, 692 S.E.2d 601 (Ga. 2010). · cites it 2× “43 ( 325 SE2d 455 ) (1984); OCGA § 9-11-70. Therefore, as of 1973, Cullen Price had a life estate interest and the appellants held the remainder interest.”
Bootery, Inc. v. Cumberland Creek Props., Inc., 517 S.E.2d 68 (Ga. 1999). · cites it 2× “12 Wright, Miller & Marcus, Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civil 2d § 3021, p.”
Redwine v. Masters, 602 S.E.2d 143 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “Because a decree for specific performance operates as a deed (OCGA § 9-11-70), the description in the contract should be as definite as that required for a deed.”
Nelson v. Smothers, 308 S.E.2d 239 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 4× “We cannot agree. The order made the reconveyance of the land to appellant contingent on appellant having paid a sum of money into the court registry.”
Samuel Frank Cooper v. Amanda Kay Cooper (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “After Husband failed to do so, Wife moved for the appointment of a third party to effectuate the terms of the contempt order pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-70. On August 11, 2017, the trial court granted the motion, and on September 14, 2017, Husband filed this application for…”
Watson v. Wachovia Nat'l Bank, 429 S.E.2d 111 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “Given that the judgment by which Watson obtained an interest in the property was not recorded, her open possession of the property was the only notice which could prevent the Bank from claiming the status of a bona fide purchaser for value without notice, and asserting the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.