Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
O.C.G.A. § 9-12-3 — How verdict received | Georgia Code
O.C.G.A. § 9-12-3 (2018) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Scholar Amendments

TITLE 9 CIVIL PRACTICE

Section 12. Verdict and Judgment, 9-12-1 through 9-12-138.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

9-12-3. How verdict received.

Verdicts shall be received only in open court in the absence of agreement of the parties.

(Orig. Code 1863, § 3486; Code 1868, § 3509; Code 1873, § 3567; Code 1882, § 3567; Civil Code 1895, § 5336; Civil Code 1910, § 5931; Code 1933, § 110-107.)

Cross references.

- For corresponding provision relating to criminal procedure, see § 17-9-21.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Purpose of section.

- This section is specific authority for receiving verdicts, by agreement, otherwise than in open court. Malcolm Bros. v. Pollock, 181 Ga. 687, 183 S.E. 917, answer conformed to, 52 Ga. App. 772, 184 S.E. 659 (1936).

Return of sealed jury verdict to sheriff per agreement.

- When in a civil case, after the jury has taken the case under advisement and before the jury renders the verdict, the trial judge leaves court and goes to the judge's home in another county, having directed in open court that the verdict shall be sealed and "returned" to the sheriff, with consent of counsel for both sides, verdict afterward rendered and "returned" to the sheriff and never received in open court or other than as indicated was not a nullity. Malcolm Bros. v. Pollock, 181 Ga. 687, 183 S.E. 917, answer conformed to, 52 Ga. App. 772, 184 S.E. 659 (1936).

Implied consent to sealed verdict.

- Counsel's consent to rendition of a sealed verdict in absence of the judge may be implied, when the judge states in the counsel's presence that, if there is no objection, the judge will be absent from court and go to the judge's home in another county, and that, should the jury make a verdict, the verdict should be sealed and returned to the sheriff. Malcolm Bros. v. Pollock, 52 Ga. App. 772, 184 S.E. 659 (1936).

Cited in Smith v. Jones, 185 Ga. 236, 194 S.E. 556 (1937).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 75B Am. Jur. 2d, Trial, § 1533 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 89 C.J.S., Trial, § 992 et seq.

Database error: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 8 attempt to write a readonly database

This Georgia Code resource is curated by this site's author, a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Title 9 in the context of Georgia civil practice and statute of limitations and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida and South Georgia. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.