Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448
O.C.G.A. § 9-13-124 — Affidavit of illegality - When received | Georgia Code
O.C.G.A. § 9-13-124 (2018) Copy Cite Official Site Syfertize CourtListener Scholar Amendments

TITLE 9 CIVIL PRACTICE

Section 13. Executions and Judicial Sales, 9-13-1 through 9-13-178.

ARTICLE 6 ILLEGALITY

9-13-124. Affidavit of illegality - When received.

No affidavit of illegality shall be received by any sheriff or other executing officer until a levy has been made.

(Laws 1838, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 514; Code 1863, § 3592; Code 1868, § 3615; Code 1873, § 3665; Code 1882, § 3665; Civil Code 1895, § 4737; Civil Code 1910, § 5306; Code 1933, § 39-1003.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Until there is levy, affidavit of illegality cannot legally be filed and is subject to dismissal. Associates Disct. Corp. v. Gentry, 96 Ga. App. 856, 101 S.E.2d 891 (1958).

Affidavit properly dismissed when no showing that execution issued or levy made.

- When there is nothing in the record to show that an execution had been issued, the trial court did not err in dismissing the affidavit of illegality. Robbins v. Kinman, 177 Ga. 46, 169 S.E. 304 (1933).

Affidavit of illegality interposed by the defendant in the main case to a garnishment proceeding should be dismissed if the affidavit does not appear that there was any levy upon the property of the defendant. Powell v. Powell, 95 Ga. App. 122, 97 S.E.2d 193 (1957).

Party estopped to deny levy once admitted in affidavit of illegality.

- Defendant in fieri facias who has recited a levy in the defendant's affidavit of illegality will not be heard to controvert the fact of such levy at the trial of the affidavit. Smith v. Camp, 84 Ga. 117, 10 S.E. 539 (1889).

Affidavit improper when levy on property of another.

- When an execution against an individual has been levied upon property of a corporation, the former cannot interpose an affidavit of illegality thereto. State v. Sallade, 111 Ga. 700, 36 S.E. 922 (1900).

Cited in Georgia Ry. & Power Co. v. Head, 150 Ga. 177, 103 S.E. 158 (1920); Carter v. Alma State Bank, 34 Ga. App. 766, 131 S.E. 184 (1926); McClenton v. Wetherington, 89 Ga. App. 61, 78 S.E.2d 550 (1953); Lenett v. Lutz, 215 Ga. 369, 110 S.E.2d 628 (1959); Marietta Broadcasting Co. v. Advance Mktg. Research, Inc., 231 Ga. 13, 200 S.E.2d 134 (1973).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 30 Am. Jur. 2d, Executions and Enforcement of Judgments, § 269 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 33 C.J.S., Executions, § 291 et seq.

Database error: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 8 attempt to write a readonly database

This Georgia Code resource is curated by this site's author, a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Title 9 in the context of Georgia civil practice and statute of limitations and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida and South Georgia. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.