Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Laws 1831, Cobb's 1851 Digest, p. 514; Code 1863, §§ 3582, 3583; Code 1868, §§ 3605, 3606; Code 1873, §§ 3655, 3656; Code 1882, §§ 3655, 3656; Civil Code 1895, §§ 5466, 5467; Civil Code 1910, §§ 6071, 6072; Code 1933, §§ 39-1301, 39-1302; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 9.)
This section grants to officer right to sell property and sue for deficiency, rather than bring suit for the entire purchase price. Collier v. Perkerson, 31 Ga. 117 (1860); Oliver v. State, 66 Ga. 602 (1881).
This section does not apply when second sale was under older executions. Barlow v. Toole, 80 Ga. 9, 5 S.E. 246 (1887).
This section does not apply when only part of property is resold. Smith v. Roberts, 106 Ga. 409, 32 S.E. 375 (1899).
Bidder takes risk when the bidder refuses to comply with the bid and lets the property be sold again, in that the bidder takes the chance of the property bringing more or less than the bidder, thus eliminating or increasing the bidder's liability. Womack v. Tidewell, 38 Ga. App. 232, 143 S.E. 620 (1928).
Plaintiff and defendant in execution have same rights under subsection (b) of this section. Cureton v. Wright, 73 Ga. 8 (1884).
Resale must be made as soon as practicable. Saunders v. Bell, 56 Ga. 442 (1876); Roberts v. Smith, 137 Ga. 30, 72 S.E. 410 (1911); Hardin v. Adair, 140 Ga. 263, 78 S.E. 1073 (1913).
It is questionable whether executor or administrator could elect to resell after delay of 13 months at the instance of the purchaser. Peek v. Peek, 166 Ga. 166, 142 S.E. 663 (1928).
Sheriff cannot give bidder certain time to raise money. Willbanks v. Untriner, 98 Ga. 801, 25 S.E. 841 (1896); Wood v. Henry, 107 Ga. 389, 33 S.E. 410 (1899).
Notice of resale may be given on day of original sale. Suttles v. Sewell, 109 Ga. 707, 35 S.E. 224 (1900); Brockhan v. Hirsch, 128 Ga. 819, 58 S.E. 468 (1907).
Notice of resale need not state that original bidder is held liable for deficiency. Gay v. Parish, 138 Ga. 399, 75 S.E. 323 (1912).
Agent who bid for purchaser need not be made party to action against the purchaser. Sproull v. Seay, 74 Ga. 676 (1885).
To charge purchaser at first sale, sheriff would have to show that second sale was consummated. Hicks v. Ayer, 5 Ga. 298 (1848); Orr v. Brown, 5 Ga. 400 (1848); Henderick v. Davis, 27 Ga. 167 (1859).
Cited in Morgan v. Wolpert, 164 Ga. 462, 139 S.E. 15 (1927); Zugar v. Scarbrough, 186 Ga. 310, 197 S.E. 854 (1938); Sims v. Ramsey, 186 Ga. 732, 198 S.E. 770 (1938); Citizens Bank v. Lamar County, 187 Ga. 123, 200 S.E. 257 (1938); Allen v. Bemis, 193 Ga. 556, 19 S.E.2d 516 (1942); Timpson v. Simmons, 188 Ga. App. 793, 374 S.E.2d 356 (1988).
- 47 Am. Jur. 2d, Judicial Sales, §§ 135 et seq., 141 et seq.
15A Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Judicial Sales, § 70.
- 50A C.J.S., Judicial Sales, § 59 et seq.
- Grounds, other than resale or defective title or irregularity in sale, for relief of successful bidder at judicial sale from obligation to comply with bid, 63 A.L.R. 974.
Conclusiveness on purchaser at judicial sale of provisions of order or decree of confirmation regarding terms and conditions, 95 A.L.R. 1492.
Attack upon judgment by purchasers at judicial sale for purpose of preventing confirmation, or otherwise relieving them from the obligation assumed, 174 A.L.R. 538.
Enforceability as between the parties of agreement to purchase property at judicial or tax sale for their joint benefit, 14 A.L.R.2d 1267.
Warning: 'results' key not found in API response
No results found for Georgia Code 9-13-170.