
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448On the death of a defendant after final judgment when no execution has been issued prior to such death, execution may issue as though the death had not taken place.
(Orig. Code 1863, § 3370; Code 1868, § 3389; Ga. L. 1873, p. 21, § 1; Code 1873, § 3437; Code 1882, § 3437; Civil Code 1895, § 5034; Civil Code 1910, § 5616; Code 1933, § 3-419.)
This section changed common-law rule. Smith v. Lockett, 73 Ga. 104 (1884); Mims v. McKenzie, 22 Ga. App. 571, 96 S.E. 441 (1918).
Death of defendant after issuance of execution will not prevent sale of property. Brooks v. Rooney, 11 Ga. 423 (1852); Hudgins v. McLain, 116 Ga. 273, 42 S.E. 489 (1902).
Death of defendant will not prevent officer from making entry of levy to prevent dormancy. Hatcher v. Lord, 115 Ga. 619, 41 S.E. 1007 (1902).
Cited in Pursley v. Manley, 166 Ga. 809, 144 S.E. 242 (1928).
- 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Abatement, Survival, and Revival, § 57. 30 Am. Jur. 2d, Executions and Enforcement of Judgments, § 52.
- 1 C.J.S., Abatement and Revival, § 151. 33 C.J.S., Executions, § 71 et seq.
Database error: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 8 attempt to write a readonly database
This Georgia Code resource is curated by Graham Syfert, a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Title 9 in the context of Georgia civil practice and statute of limitations and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida and South Georgia. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.