Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Custody and control of the petitioner shall be retained by the Department of Corrections or other authority having custody of the petitioner. It shall be the duty of the department or authority to produce the petitioner at such times and places as the court may direct.
(Code 1933, § 50-127, enacted by Ga. L. 1967, p. 835, § 3; Ga. L. 1985, p. 283, § 1.)
This section contemplates custodians other than the Board of Corrections (now Department of Offender Rehabilitation), including the State Parole Board (now State Board of Pardons and Paroles). Fox v. Dutton, 406 F.2d 123 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 916, 89 S. Ct. 1764, 23 L. Ed. 2d 229 (1969).
- As it is the duty of the department or other authority having custody of a habeas petitioner to produce the petitioner at such times and places as the superior court may direct, it is not necessary that the commissioner of the department be joined as a party in a habeas action. James v. Hight, 251 Ga. 563, 307 S.E.2d 660 (1983).
Cited in Heaton v. Lemacks, 266 Ga. 189, 466 S.E.2d 7 (1996).
- Applicant for habeas corpus relief may be transferred from one institution to another, so long as the Board of Corrections (now Department of Offender Rehabilitation) retains the applicant's custody and the applicant is produced at such times and places as the habeas court may direct, subject to the sole restriction that an applicant for habeas corpus relief becomes ineligible during the pendency of the applicant's application for transfer to a county work camp or other institution or form of restraint not maintained by the Board of Corrections (now Department of Offender Rehabilitation). 1971 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 71-160.
- 39 Am. Jur. 2d, Habeas Corpus and Postconviction Remedies, §§ 106, 159, 160.
Warning: 'results' key not found in API response
No results found for Georgia Code 9-14-46.