O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 9-4-6 (2019)

Submission of fact issues to jury

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When a declaration of right or the granting of further relief based thereon involves the determination of issues of fact triable by a jury and jury trial is not waived, the issues shall be submitted to a jury of 12 in the form of interrogatories, with proper instructions by the court, whether a general verdict is required or not. The instructions by the

court shall in all respects be governed by the laws of this state relating to instructions or charges by a court to a jury.

History

Ga. L. 1945, p. 137, § 3.

Annotations

Cross references. Requirement that jury return only spe-

cial verdict in case involving declaratory judgment, § 9-11-49.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Provision is made by this section for determination of factual issues, and the extent of timber cutting which accords with good husbandry in a given locality under ascertained circumstances is a question of fact. Brogdon v. McMillan, 116 Ga. App. 34, 156 S.E.2d 828, 1967 Ga. App. LEXIS 680 (1967). Oral instructions improper when timely request made for special verdict. - If a timely written request for special verdict was made, the requirements of Ga. L. 1945, p. 137, § 3 and Ga. L. 1972, p. 689, § 8 (see now O.C.G.A. §§ 9-4-6 and 9-11-49) were not satisfied in the declaratory judgment proceedings by instructing the jury orally as to the questions which must be resolved by the job in arriving at a verdict. Frostgate Whses., Inc. v. Cole, 244 Ga. 782, 262 S.E.2d 98, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1413 (1979). Party waives error in manner of instruction unless timely objection made. - In the absence of a specific and timely objection, a party waives error relating to the manner in which questions are submitted to the jury. Frostgate Whses., Inc. v. Cole, 244 Ga. 782, 262 S.E.2d 98, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 1413 (1979). Amount of tax credit is jury question. - Plaintiff housing corporation is entitled to a declaratory judgment fixing the amount of tax credits to be allowed it by defendant municipality under provisions of local Act when defendant has taken over certain graded and paved streets and sewer and water mains con-

structed by the plaintiff’s predecessor in title; but a jury question is made by the evidence as to the value of such credits to be allowed, and under this section, since a jury trial was not waived, the court erred in making a finding as to the amount of such tax credits without submitting such issue to a jury. Mayor of Savannah v. Moses Rogers Hous. Corp., 91 Ga. App. 32, 84 S.E.2d 488, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 851 (1954). Amount of rent due as fixed by jury in declaratory judgment controls in further proceedings. - If, in a declaratory judgment by a tenant proceeding, the amount of rent due should be adjudicated prior to any such determination for pastdue rent under a subsequent dispossessory warrant, such finding by a jury in the declaratory judgment case would govern and control the amount due in the dispossessory warrant proceeding, and vice versa. Shippen v. Folsom, 200 Ga. 58, 35 S.E.2d 915, 1945 Ga. LEXIS 396 (1945). Abandonment of a cemetery was a jury question. - Descendants of the grantor of a burial ground were not entitled to summary judgment on a buyer’s claim that the cemetery was abandoned, O.C.G.A. § 36-72-2(1), because there was evidence that no one had been buried there since 1971, that the descendants had not paid taxes on the lot, and that the descendants had not maintained the cemetery. City of Sandy Springs v. Mills, 331 Ga. App. 709, 771 S.E.2d 405, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 220 (2015).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 22A Am. Jur. 2d, Declaratory Judgments, § 232 et seq.

C.J.S. 26 C.J.S., Declaratory Judgments, § 164 et seq.

U.L.A. Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act (U.L.A.) § 9. ALR. Declaration of rights or declaratory judgments, 12 A.L.R. 52; 19 A.L.R. 1124;

50 A.L.R. 42; 68 A.L.R. 110; 87 A.L.R. 1205; 114 A.L.R. 1361; 142 A.L.R. 8. Jury trial in action for declaratory relief, 13 A.L.R.2d 777; 33 A.L.R.4th 146. Right to jury trial in action for declaratory relief in state court, 33 A.L.R.4th 146.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Mabry, 556 S.E.2d 114 (Ga. 2001).
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Mabry, 556 S.E.2d 114 (Ga. 2001). · cites it 2× “A jury trial is proper in a declaratory judgment action “[w]hen a declaration of right or the granting of further relief based thereon involves the determination of issues of fact triable by a jury and jury trial is not waived.”
Anthony v. Gator Cochran Constr., Inc., 702 S.E.2d 139 (Ga. 2010). · cites it 2× “Frostgate addressed only the statutory procedures for submitting interrogatories to the jury in a declaratory judgment action currently found in OCGA §§ 9-4-6 and 9-11-49, and it merely ruled upon a party’s preservation of error in that context; its statement that “in the *80…”
Gov't Employees Ins. v. Progressive Cas. Ins., 622 S.E.2d 92 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “Progressive maintains that special verdicts, which are required when a jury assists in a declaratory judgment case (see OCGA §§ 9-4-6; 9-11-49 (b)), may not allow the jury to reach legal conclusions.”
Res-ga Ypl, LLC v. Rowland Et Al., 798 S.E.2d 315 (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “The legal consequences flow from the facts, and it is the province of the court to ascertain and find the facts in accordance with the rules prescribed in the Georgia Declaratory Judgments Act in order to determine the legal consequences.”
Valley Wood, Inc. v. Georgia Cas. & Sur. Co., 783 S.E.2d 441 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 9-4-6 (“When a declaration of right.”
Mersac, Inc. v. Nat'l Hills Condo. Ass'n, 480 S.E.2d 16 (Ga. 1997). · cites it 2× “Because the right to a jury trial under OCGA §§ 9-4-6 and 9-11-65 is waivable and because Mersac failed to include the transcript, we must assume the trial court proceeded to decide all the issues in both the declaratory judgment action and counterclaim for injunction with…”
Torgesen v. Torgesen, 617 S.E.2d 223 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “See also OCGA§ 9-4-6 (providing for issues of fact to be determined by a jury in declaratory judgment actions).”
Angel L. Torres, Jr. v. Lori Torres (Ga. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 9-4-6. Here, in its order denying the husband’s motion to dismiss, the trial court found that the settlement agreement contained an ambiguity that could only be resolved by looking to competing evidence of the parties’ intent.”
Buford Dam Ventures, LLC v. Faith Bus., Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “Jury trials in declaratory judgment actions are governed by OCGA § 9-4-6, which provides in part: When a declaration of right or the granting of further relief based thereon involves the determination of issues of fact triable by a jury and jury trial is not waived, the issues…”
Valley Wood, Inc. v. Georgia Cas. & Sur. Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “involves the determination of issues of fact triable by a jury and jury trial is not waived, the issues shall be submitted to a jury of 12 in the form Additionally, an insurer is not required to promptly rescind a policy and return the premium before seeking a declaratory…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.