Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 64-202.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, p. 766, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1225, § 2.)
- Ga. L. 2000, p. 1589, § 16, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment to this Code section is applicable with respect to notices delivered on or after July 1, 2000.
- In an action seeking quo warranto, because the trial court's order was not directed at a party not served, and did not require that party to do anything, a third party lacked any legal right to complain that the party was not served. City of College Park v. Wyatt, 282 Ga. 479, 651 S.E.2d 686 (2007).
- 65 Am. Jur. 2d, Quo Warranto, § 55.
- 74 C.J.S., Quo Warranto, § 40.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-11-04
Citation: 294 Ga. 15, 751 S.E.2d 47, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 3328, 2013 WL 5878124, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 888
Snippet: distribution. Compare Livingston v. Taylor, 132 Ga. 1, 9 (6) (63 SE 694) (1908) (a party’s passive acquiescence
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-10-09
Citation: 651 S.E.2d 686, 282 Ga. 479, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3056, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 728
Snippet: not personally served with process, see OCGA § 9-6-63, and that this quo warranto proceeding could not