Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 9-8-14 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 9-8-14 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 9-8-14

TITLE 9 CIVIL PRACTICE

Section 8. Receivers, 9-8-1 through 9-8-14.

ARTICLE 4 QUO WARRANTO

9-8-14. Expenses of giving bond allowable as cost of administration.

  1. Receivers who are required by law to give bond as such who have given as security on such bonds one or more guaranty companies, surety companies, fidelity insurance companies, or fidelity and deposit companies, as authorized by law, may include as part of their lawful expenses or costs of administration such reasonable sum or sums paid to the company or companies for the suretyship not exceeding 1 percent per annum on the amount of the bond as the court, judge, or other officer by whom they were appointed allows.
  2. Any court, judge, or other officer whose duty it is to pass upon the account of any person or corporation required to execute a bond with surety or sureties, whenever the person or corporation has given any such company or companies as security as provided in subsection (a) of this Code section, shall allow in the settlement of the account a reasonable sum for the expenses and premiums incurred in securing the surety, not exceeding the amounts specified in the subsection.

(Ga. L. 1903, p. 75, § 1; Civil Code 1910, §§ 4071, 4072; Code 1933, §§ 55-316, 55-317.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Cited in Considine v. Murphy, 297 Ga. 164, 773 S.E.2d 176 (2015).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 66 Am. Jur. 2d, Receivers, § 212.

C.J.S.

- 75 C.J.S., Receivers, §§ 376, 473 et seq.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 9-8-14

Total Results: 3  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Considine v. Murphy, 297 Ga. 164 (Ga. 2015).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 1, 2015 | 773 S.E.2d 176

...nsidine describes as a business “with international presence in engineering and 3D modeling technology.” On September 3, 2008, the court entered a Consent Order finding that “the appointment of a receiver pursuant to OCGA §§ 9-8-1 through 9-8-14 is necessary to preserve the property of Model Master during the pendency of this litigation.” The Consent Order instructed Considine and Affatato to identify a mutually agreeable receiver within 14 days, listed the “limited purposes”...
Copy

Boykin v. Bradley, 14 S.E.2d 734 (Ga. 1941).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 17, 1941 | 192 Ga. 212

Considine v. Murphy (Ga. 2015).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 1, 2015 | 192 Ga. 212

...nsidine describes as a business “with international presence in engineering and 3D modeling technology.” On September 3, 2008, the court entered a Consent Order finding that “the appointment of a receiver pursuant to OCGA §§ 9-8-1 through 9-8-14 is necessary to preserve the property of Model Master during the pendency of this litigation.” The Consent Order instructed Considine and Affatato to identify a mutually agreeable receiver within 14 days, listed the “limited purposes”...