Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 11
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-191 (2026)

to 11-213  [OLD]  REPEALED. 

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

B.  Election Campaign Contributions

and Expenditures--Repealed

 

     §§11-191 to 11-213  [OLD]  REPEALED.  L 1979, c 224.

 

     §§11-191 to 11-225  REPEALED.  L 2010, c 211, §9.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1985–2009 · leading case: Blair v. Harris, 45 P.3d 798 (Haw. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Blair v. Harris, 45 P.3d 798 (Haw. 2002). · cites it 8× “The resignation threshold set by the circuit court defines the "triggering event" as the filing of an organization report under HRS § 11-194, which is required once one performs an act falling within the definition of a "candidate" under HRS § 11-191 (Supp.2001). This leads to a…”
Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Watada, 199 F. Supp. 2d 1018 (D. Haw. 2002). · cites it 2× “” See Haw.Rev.Stat. § 11-191 (defining “earmarked funds” as having a “condition that the funds be .”
State v. Mehau, 711 P.2d 727 (Haw. 1985). · cites it 4× “” See HRS § 11-191(6)(A). Since any “committee” as defined above “which makes expenditures in aggregate [of] more than $1000 .”
Lind v. Grimmer, 859 F. Supp. 1317 (D. Haw. 1993). · cites it 2× “Election Campaign Contributions and Expenditures; HRS 11-191 through HRS § 11-229] other than in section 11-193(b)(1), shall be punishable in the manner prescribed as follows: (1)If a natural person, the person shall be guilty of a petty misdemeanor and shall be subject to the…”
Charmaine Tavares Campaign v. Wong, 217 P.3d 951 (Haw. App. 2009). · cites it 16× “” HRS § 11-191 (Supp.2005). A “candidate’s committee” is a “committee” 4 which “makes an expenditure or ac *255 cepts a contribution in behalf of a candidate 5 with the candidate’s authorization.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-191(6)(A) — 1 case
State v. Mehau, 711 P.2d 727 (Haw. 1985). “” See HRS § 11-191(6)(A). Since any “committee” as defined above “which makes expenditures in aggregate [of] more than $1000 .”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 11-191(6)(D) — 1 case
State v. Mehau, 711 P.2d 727 (Haw. 1985). “” See HRS § 11-191(6)(A). Since any “committee” as defined above “which makes expenditures in aggregate [of] more than $1000 .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.