Hawaii Revised Statutes
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134-6 (2026)
REPEALED
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§134-6 REPEALED. L 2006, c 66, §6.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 122
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1974–2023 · leading case: State v. Brantley, 56 P.3d 1252 (Haw. 2002).
State v. Brantley, 56 P.3d 1252 (Haw. 2002). “On April 13, 1999, the Governor signed into law Act 12, which amended HRS § 134-6 to explicitly state that an individual could be convicted of both HRS § 134-6(a) and the separate felony.”
State v. Jumila, 950 P.2d 1201 (Haw. 1998). “[2] HRS § 134-6 provides in relevant part: Carrying or use of firearm in the commission of a separate felony; place to keep firearms; loaded firearms; penalty.”
State v. Ganal, 917 P.2d 370 (Haw. 1996). “[6] HRS § 134-6 (Supp.1992) provides in pertinent part: Possession or use of firearm in the commission of a felony; place to keep firearms; loaded firearms; penalty.”
State v. Jenkins, 997 P.2d 13 (Haw. 2000). “1997), [11] pursuant to HRS § 134-6, see supra note 4. [12] We address these issues in turn.”
State v. Van Den Berg, 65 P.3d 134 (Haw. 2003). “, the underlying murder), or, in the alternative, to vacate their mandatory *140 minimum sentences imposed under HRS § 706-660.”
State v. Feliciano, 115 P.3d 648 (Haw. 2005). “5) and use of a firearm in commission of a felony (HRS § 134-6) were improper under HRS § 701-109 because the second-degree murder charge was an included offense of the firearm charge.”
State v. Pulse, 925 P.2d 797 (Haw. 1996). “At the time of the incident giving rise to the charges in the instant case, HRS § 134-6 provided in pertinent part: (a) It shall be unlawful for a person to knowingly possess or intentionally use or threaten to use a firearm while engaged in the commission of a felony, whether…”
State v. Israel, 890 P.2d 303 (Haw. 1995). “Since the order of dismissal in the instant case, the legislature has amended HRS § 134-6 to specifically exclude certain enumerated felonies, including Terroristic Threatening in the First Degree, as the basis for an HRS § 134-6(a) charge.”
State v. Reis, 165 P.3d 980 (Haw. 2007). “[11] Van den Berg raised the question whether the 1990 or 1993 version of HRS § 134-6(a), involving use of a firearm in the commission of a felony, applied to the defendants' cases.”
State v. Cordeiro, 56 P.3d 692 (Haw. 2002). “5 (1993), [1] robbery in the first degree, in violation of HRS § 708-840 (1993), [2] and prohibited place to keep firearm, in violation of HRS § 134-6 (Supp.1997), [3] and, in connection with Cr.”
State v. Vanstory, 979 P.2d 1059 (Haw. 1999). “) Likewise, HRS § 134-6 provides in pertinent part: Carrying or use of firearm in the commission of a separate felony; place to keep firearms; loaded firearms; penalty.”
State v. Christian, 967 P.2d 239 (Haw. 1998). “2d 1201 (1998), this court reasoned as follows: “because HRS § 134-6(a) [(1993 and Supp.1997) 19 ] requires the actual commission of an underlying felony,” the prosecution “is required to prove all of the conduct, attendant circumstances, *432 and results of conduct that…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134-6(a) — 47 cases
State v. Brantley, 56 P.3d 1252 (Haw. 2002). “On April 13, 1999, the Governor signed into law Act 12, which amended HRS § 134-6 to explicitly state that an individual could be convicted of both HRS § 134-6(a) and the separate felony.”
State v. Jumila, 950 P.2d 1201 (Haw. 1998). “[2] HRS § 134-6 provides in relevant part: Carrying or use of firearm in the commission of a separate felony; place to keep firearms; loaded firearms; penalty.”
State v. Ganal, 917 P.2d 370 (Haw. 1996). “[6] HRS § 134-6 (Supp.1992) provides in pertinent part: Possession or use of firearm in the commission of a felony; place to keep firearms; loaded firearms; penalty.”
State v. Van Den Berg, 65 P.3d 134 (Haw. 2003). “, the underlying murder), or, in the alternative, to vacate their mandatory *140 minimum sentences imposed under HRS § 706-660.”
State v. Feliciano, 115 P.3d 648 (Haw. 2005). “5) and use of a firearm in commission of a felony (HRS § 134-6) were improper under HRS § 701-109 because the second-degree murder charge was an included offense of the firearm charge.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134-6(a)(1993) — 1 case
State v. Van Den Berg, 65 P.3d 134 (Haw. 2003). “, the underlying murder), or, in the alternative, to vacate their mandatory *140 minimum sentences imposed under HRS § 706-660.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134-6(a)(3) — 1 case
State v. Ganal, 917 P.2d 370 (Haw. 1996). “[6] HRS § 134-6 (Supp.1992) provides in pertinent part: Possession or use of firearm in the commission of a felony; place to keep firearms; loaded firearms; penalty.”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134-6(b) — 7 cases
State v. Pulse, 925 P.2d 797 (Haw. 1996). “At the time of the incident giving rise to the charges in the instant case, HRS § 134-6 provided in pertinent part: (a) It shall be unlawful for a person to knowingly possess or intentionally use or threaten to use a firearm while engaged in the commission of a felony, whether…”
State v. Israel, 890 P.2d 303 (Haw. 1995). “Since the order of dismissal in the instant case, the legislature has amended HRS § 134-6 to specifically exclude certain enumerated felonies, including Terroristic Threatening in the First Degree, as the basis for an HRS § 134-6(a) charge.”
State v. Jumila, 950 P.2d 1201 (Haw. 1998). “[2] HRS § 134-6 provides in relevant part: Carrying or use of firearm in the commission of a separate felony; place to keep firearms; loaded firearms; penalty.”
State v. Meyer, 893 P.2d 159 (Haw. 1995).
State v. Lessary, 925 P.2d 1104 (Haw. App. 1996).
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134-6(c) — 41 cases
State v. Jenkins, 997 P.2d 13 (Haw. 2000). “1997), [11] pursuant to HRS § 134-6, see supra note 4. [12] We address these issues in turn.”
State v. Feliciano, 115 P.3d 648 (Haw. 2005). “5) and use of a firearm in commission of a felony (HRS § 134-6) were improper under HRS § 701-109 because the second-degree murder charge was an included offense of the firearm charge.”
State v. Cordeiro, 56 P.3d 692 (Haw. 2002). “5 (1993), [1] robbery in the first degree, in violation of HRS § 708-840 (1993), [2] and prohibited place to keep firearm, in violation of HRS § 134-6 (Supp.1997), [3] and, in connection with Cr.”
State v. Mara, 41 P.3d 157 (Haw. 2002).
State v. Vinuya, 32 P.3d 116 (Haw. App. 2001).
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134-6(d) — 7 cases
State v. Van Den Berg, 65 P.3d 134 (Haw. 2003). “, the underlying murder), or, in the alternative, to vacate their mandatory *140 minimum sentences imposed under HRS § 706-660.”
State v. Taua, 49 P.3d 1227 (Haw. 2002).
State v. Auwae, 968 P.2d 1070 (Haw. App. 1998).
State v. Tau'a, 49 P.3d 1227 (Haw. 2002).
State v. Astronomo, 18 P.3d 938 (Haw. App. 2001).
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 134-6(e) — 18 cases
State v. Jenkins, 997 P.2d 13 (Haw. 2000). “1997), [11] pursuant to HRS § 134-6, see supra note 4. [12] We address these issues in turn.”
State v. Jumila, 950 P.2d 1201 (Haw. 1998). “[2] HRS § 134-6 provides in relevant part: Carrying or use of firearm in the commission of a separate felony; place to keep firearms; loaded firearms; penalty.”
State v. Feliciano, 115 P.3d 648 (Haw. 2005). “5) and use of a firearm in commission of a felony (HRS § 134-6) were improper under HRS § 701-109 because the second-degree murder charge was an included offense of the firearm charge.”
State v. Brantley, 56 P.3d 1252 (Haw. 2002). “On April 13, 1999, the Governor signed into law Act 12, which amended HRS § 134-6 to explicitly state that an individual could be convicted of both HRS § 134-6(a) and the separate felony.”
State v. Aiwohi, 123 P.3d 1210 (Haw. 2005).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.