Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 663
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 663-14 (2026)

and 663-15  REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §§663-14 and 663-15  REPEALED.  L 2001, c 300, §§3, 4.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1972–2012 · leading case: Saranillio v. Silva, 889 P.2d 685 (Haw. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Saranillio v. Silva, 889 P.2d 685 (Haw. 1995). · cites it 76× “]" HRS § 663-14 tracks the language of section 4 of the 1939 version of the UCATA, providing: Release; effect on injured person's claim.”
Tabieros v. Clark Equip. Co., 944 P.2d 1279 (Haw. 1997). · cites it 7× “HRS § 663-14 (1993) provides: Release; effect on Injured person’s claim.”
Nobriga v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 683 P.2d 389 (Haw. 1984). · cites it 13× “38 The court followed the literal wording of HRS § 663-14 and the releases and treated each settlement individually.”
Gump v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 5 P.3d 407 (Haw. 2000). · cites it 8× “Compare HRS § 663-14 (Release; effect on injured person’s claim) with HRS § 663-15 (1993) (Release; effect on right of contribution).”
AlohaCare v. Ito, 271 P.3d 621 (Haw. 2012). · cites it 4× “2d at 394 (looking to the legislative objective of HRS § 663-14 to determine that the legislature did not intend for there to be a different result based on whether the singular or plural form of the phrase "one joint tortfeasor" and the word "release" was used in the Uniform…”
Aga v. Hundahl, 891 P.2d 1022 (Haw. 1995). · cites it 2× “HRS § 663-14 (Supp.1992) provides: Release; effect on injured person’s claim.”
Gump v. Walmart Stores, Inc., 5 P.3d 418 (Haw. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “The UCATA preserves a joint tort-feasor’s right to contribution in a variety of contexts and situations, to the extent the joint tortfeasor’s discharge of liability exceeds its pro rata share of liability.”
Amantiad v. Odum, 977 P.2d 160 (Haw. 1999). “IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED that this release shall operate as a joint tortfeasor release within the meaning of Sections 663-11 through 663-17 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, and shall within the meaning of Section 663-14 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, operate to reduce…”
Alamida v. Wilson, 495 P.2d 585 (Haw. 1972). · cites it 2× “6 If the payment of Morse and Keawe can be said to be a “gratuity,” the question arises, “to whom is the payment a gratuity, the plaintiff or the defendants?” Where there has been no accord and satisfaction, such as where the plaintiff grants a covenant not to sue or a partial…”
Converse v. James, 974 P.2d 1051 (Haw. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Finally, the Hawaii Supreme Court’s construction of HRS § 663-14 (1985) of the Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (UCATA), which governs the effect of a release by an injured party of a joint tortfea-sor on the remaining tortfeasors and is very similar in nature to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.