Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 706
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 706-668 (2026)

  REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §706-668  REPEALED.  L 1986, c 314, §46.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1978–2013 · leading case: State v. Kamana'o, 188 P.3d 724 (Haw. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Kamana'o, 188 P.3d 724 (Haw. 2008). · cites it 110× “5 are part of indeterminate maximum sentences; (4) HRS § 706-668 (Special Pamphlet 1975) 5 requires that multiple sentences imposed by the court shall be served concurrently; (5) HRS § 706-606.”
State v. Kamanao, 188 P.3d 724 (Haw. 2008). · cites it 110× “5 are part of indeterminate maximum sentences; (4) HRS § 706-668 (Special Pamphlet 1975) [5] requires that multiple sentences imposed by the court shall be served concurrently; (5) HRS § 706-606.”
State v. Gaylord, 890 P.2d 1167 (Haw. 1995). · cites it 44× “Legislative evolution of the Hawai`i consecutive sentencing statute As originally enacted in 1972, the HPC addressed the option of concurrent versus consecutive sentencing in HRS § 706-668. HRS § 706-668 (1972), provided in relevant part: [29] Concurrent and consecutive terms of…”
State v. Hussein. , 229 P.3d 313 (Haw. 2010). · cites it 20× “3d 724 (2008), this court examined the distinction between HRS § 706-668 (the prior version of HRS § 668.”
State v. Cornelio, 935 P.2d 1021 (Haw. 1997). · cites it 24× “706, in relevant part as follows: As originally enacted in 1972, the HPC addressed the option of concurrent versus consecutive sentencing in HRS § 706-668. HRS § 706-668 (1972)[ ] provided in relevant part: Concurrent and consecutive terms of imprisonment.”
State v. Sinagoga, 918 P.2d 228 (Haw. App. 1996). · cites it 12× “5 is the second version of what was originally HRS § 706-668 (1976). The original version "deprive[d] the court of the power to mandate that the sentences imposed upon a defendant be served consecutively" except "for crimes committed by prisoners while in custody or during…”
State v. Casugay-Badiang. , 305 P.3d 437 (Haw. 2013). · cites it 8× “[,] ‘clearly limits the applicability of HRS § 706-668 in cases involving the ‘[s]entencing of repeat offenders.”
State v. Kumukau, 787 P.2d 682 (Haw. 1990). · cites it 4× “See Commentary to HRS § 706-668 (1985). 2 In determining the particular sentence to be imposed, the court must consider a variety of factors 3 in exercising its discretion in fitting the punishment to the crime' “as well as the needs of the individual defendant and the community.”
State v. Tyquiengco, 723 P.2d 186 (Haw. App. 1986). · cites it 6× “1984), 4 and ordered that the ten-year sentence be served *413 consecutive to the life imprisonment term, under the authority of HRS § 706-668 (Supp. 1984). 5 U nder the original provisions of H RS § 706-606(b) (1976) relating to the authorized sentence for murder in cases not…”
State v. Huelsman, 588 P.2d 394 (Haw. 1978). “On the other hand, the commentary to § 706-668, which section requires that multiple sentences be served concurrently, states that consecutive sentences were not authorized because “the sections providing for extended terms of imprisonment more adequately and directly address…”
State v. Kaufman, 991 P.2d 832 (Haw. 2000). · cites it 2× “See HRS § 706-668 (Supp.1984) Thus, the “maximum sentence allowable” for the crimes committed was, potentially, 130 years.”
State v. Ige, 606 P.2d 83 (Haw. 1980). · cites it 4× “Section 668 of the Hawaii Penal Code [HRS § 706-668] provides: (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), when multiple sentences of imprisonment are imposed on a person at the same time, or when a person who is *520 subject to any undischarged term of imprisonment is sentenced…”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 706-668(1) — 3 cases
State v. Kamana'o, 188 P.3d 724 (Haw. 2008). “5 are part of indeterminate maximum sentences; (4) HRS § 706-668 (Special Pamphlet 1975) 5 requires that multiple sentences imposed by the court shall be served concurrently; (5) HRS § 706-606.”
State v. Kamanao, 188 P.3d 724 (Haw. 2008). “5 are part of indeterminate maximum sentences; (4) HRS § 706-668 (Special Pamphlet 1975) [5] requires that multiple sentences imposed by the court shall be served concurrently; (5) HRS § 706-606.”
State v. Ige, 606 P.2d 83 (Haw. 1980). “Section 668 of the Hawaii Penal Code [HRS § 706-668] provides: (1) Except as provided in subsection (2), when multiple sentences of imprisonment are imposed on a person at the same time, or when a person who is *520 subject to any undischarged term of imprisonment is sentenced…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 706-668(2) — 3 cases
State v. Gaylord, 890 P.2d 1167 (Haw. 1995). “Legislative evolution of the Hawai`i consecutive sentencing statute As originally enacted in 1972, the HPC addressed the option of concurrent versus consecutive sentencing in HRS § 706-668. HRS § 706-668 (1972), provided in relevant part: [29] Concurrent and consecutive terms of…”
State v. Cornelio, 935 P.2d 1021 (Haw. 1997). “706, in relevant part as follows: As originally enacted in 1972, the HPC addressed the option of concurrent versus consecutive sentencing in HRS § 706-668. HRS § 706-668 (1972)[ ] provided in relevant part: Concurrent and consecutive terms of imprisonment.”
State v. Nases, 649 P.2d 1138 (Haw. 1982).
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 706-668(l) — 1 case
State v. Kamana'o, 188 P.3d 724 (Haw. 2008). “5 are part of indeterminate maximum sentences; (4) HRS § 706-668 (Special Pamphlet 1975) 5 requires that multiple sentences imposed by the court shall be served concurrently; (5) HRS § 706-606.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.