Hawaii Revised Statutes
Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1240.6 (2026)
REPEALED
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§712-1240.6 REPEALED. L 2006, c 230, §50.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2009–2009 · leading case: State v. Ramos, 201 P.3d 628 (Haw. App. 2009).
State v. Ramos, 201 P.3d 628 (Haw. App. 2009). “Thus, the jury's guilty verdict on Count II does not necessarily mean that it found sufficient evidence to convict Ramos of violating HRS § 712-1240.6 (3). Accordingly, it would be improper for us to remand the case for entry of judgment of conviction on the lesser included HRS…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1240.6(1) — 1 case
State v. Ramos, 201 P.3d 628 (Haw. App. 2009). “Thus, the jury's guilty verdict on Count II does not necessarily mean that it found sufficient evidence to convict Ramos of violating HRS § 712-1240.6 (3). Accordingly, it would be improper for us to remand the case for entry of judgment of conviction on the lesser included HRS…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1240.6(2) — 1 case
State v. Ramos, 201 P.3d 628 (Haw. App. 2009). “Thus, the jury's guilty verdict on Count II does not necessarily mean that it found sufficient evidence to convict Ramos of violating HRS § 712-1240.6 (3). Accordingly, it would be improper for us to remand the case for entry of judgment of conviction on the lesser included HRS…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1240.6(3) — 1 case
State v. Ramos, 201 P.3d 628 (Haw. App. 2009). “Thus, the jury's guilty verdict on Count II does not necessarily mean that it found sufficient evidence to convict Ramos of violating HRS § 712-1240.6 (3). Accordingly, it would be improper for us to remand the case for entry of judgment of conviction on the lesser included HRS…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.