Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1240.6 (2026)

REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §712-1240.6  REPEALED.  L 2006, c 230, §50.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: State v. Ramos, 201 P.3d 628 (Haw. App. 2009).
State v. Ramos, 201 P.3d 628 (Haw. App. 2009). · cites it 40× “Thus, the jury's guilty verdict on Count II does not necessarily mean that it found sufficient evidence to convict Ramos of violating HRS § 712-1240.6 (3). Accordingly, it would be improper for us to remand the case for entry of judgment of conviction on the lesser included HRS…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1240.6(1) — 1 case
State v. Ramos, 201 P.3d 628 (Haw. App. 2009). “Thus, the jury's guilty verdict on Count II does not necessarily mean that it found sufficient evidence to convict Ramos of violating HRS § 712-1240.6 (3). Accordingly, it would be improper for us to remand the case for entry of judgment of conviction on the lesser included HRS…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1240.6(2) — 1 case
State v. Ramos, 201 P.3d 628 (Haw. App. 2009). “Thus, the jury's guilty verdict on Count II does not necessarily mean that it found sufficient evidence to convict Ramos of violating HRS § 712-1240.6 (3). Accordingly, it would be improper for us to remand the case for entry of judgment of conviction on the lesser included HRS…”
— Haw. Rev. Stat. § 712-1240.6(3) — 1 case
State v. Ramos, 201 P.3d 628 (Haw. App. 2009). “Thus, the jury's guilty verdict on Count II does not necessarily mean that it found sufficient evidence to convict Ramos of violating HRS § 712-1240.6 (3). Accordingly, it would be improper for us to remand the case for entry of judgment of conviction on the lesser included HRS…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.