Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 16-2011 (2026)

Effect of decree. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Effect of decree. 

An order terminating the parent and child relationship shall divest the parent and the child of all legal rights, privileges, duties, and obligations, including rights of inheritance, with respect to each other.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1978–2024 · leading case: Matter of Baby Boy Doe, 902 P.2d 477 (Idaho 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of Baby Boy Doe, 902 P.2d 477 (Idaho 1995). · cites it 2× “Under I.C. § 16-2011, an "order terminating *482 the parent and child relationship shall divest the parent and the child of all legal rights, privileges, duties, and obligations, including rights of inheritance, with respect to each other.”
Idaho Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Doe, 318 P.3d 886 (Idaho 2014). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 16-2011 (emphasis added). Consistent with these principles, this Court has previously decided that a conditional consent to termination of parental rights renders a termination order invalid.”
State v. Jeffs, 95 P.3d 84 (Idaho Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “In support of his position, Jeffs cites to I.C. § 16-2011 which provides that “an order terminating the parent and child relationship shall divest the parent and the child of all legal rights, privileges, duties, and obligations, including rights of inheritance, with respect to…”
Doe v. Roe, 902 P.2d 477 (Idaho 1995). · cites it 2× “Under I.C. § 16-2011, an “order ter *457 minating the parent and child relationship shall divest the parent and the child of all legal rights, privileges, duties, and obligations, including rights of inheritance, with respect to each other.”
Stenographic Machines, Inc. v. Reg'l Adm'r for Emp. & Training, 577 F.2d 521 (7th Cir. 1978). “” Idaho Code § 16-2011 (Supp.1976). *521 The crux of Tree Top’s petition relates to the merits of the custody dispute, and she had full and fair opportunity to litigate those issues in the state court.”
Jane Doe & John Doe 1 v. John Doe (Idaho Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 2× “The Idaho Legislature 4 There are some factual differences between Doe I and this case, but there are sufficient similarities (particularly when coupled with the standard of review) that the magistrate court’s decision in this case cannot be characterized as erroneous.”
RE: Termination of Parental Rights (Idaho 2014). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 16-2011 (emphasis added). Consistent with these principles, this Court has previously decided that a conditional consent to termination of parental rights renders a termination order invalid.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.