Fictitious bills, notes, and checks — Making, passing, uttering, or publishing.
Every person who makes, passes, utters, or publishes, with intention to defraud any other person, or who, with the like intention, attempts to pass, utter or publish, or who has in his possession, with like intent to utter, pass, or publish, any fictitious bill, note or check, purporting to be the bill, note, or check, or other instrument in writing for the payment of money or property of some bank, corporation, copartnership, or individual, when in fact, there is no such bank, corporation, copartnership, or individual in existence, knowing the bill, note, check, or instrument in writing to be fictitious, is guilty of forgery and punishable as provided by section 18-3604.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1965–2022 · leading case:
State v. Bishop, 405 P.2d 970 (Idaho 1965).
State v. Bishop, 405 P.2d 970 (Idaho 1965).
· cites it 18× “Both the State and appellant are in agreement that this prosecution was brought under the provisions of I.C. § 18-3606, which states: “Every person who makes, passes, utters, or publishes, with intention to defraud any other person, or who, with the like intention, attempts to…”
Kesling v. State (Idaho Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 6× “Kesling was charged with several offenses and ultimately pled guilty to one count of forgery, Idaho Code § 18-3606 ; the other charges were dismissed pursuant to a plea agreement.”
State v. Eric Eugene Heisley (Idaho Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 2× “I.C. § 18-3606. The district court imposed a unified five-year sentence with a two-year determinate term, but after a period of retained jurisdiction, suspended the sentence and placed Heisley on probation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.