Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 19-101 (2026)

Legal conviction necessary to punishment. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Legal conviction necessary to punishment. 

No person can be punished for a public offense except upon a legal conviction in a court having jurisdiction thereof.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1978–2022 · leading case: State v. Wagenius, 581 P.2d 319 (Idaho 1978).
State v. Wagenius, 581 P.2d 319 (Idaho 1978). · cites it 34× “Our inquiry commences with I.C. § 19-101 which provides: "19-101. LEGAL CONVICTION NECESSARY TO PUNISHMENT.”
Paradis v. State, 716 P.2d 1306 (Idaho 1986). · cites it 4× “, I.C. § 19-101 ("No person can be punished for a public offense except upon a legal conviction in a court having jurisdiction thereof.”
State v. Flowers, 249 P.3d 367 (Idaho 2011). · cites it 4× “Idaho Code § 19-101 states, “No person can be punished for a public offense except upon a legal conviction in a court having jurisdiction thereof.”
United States v. Sharp, 179 P.3d 1059 (Idaho 2008). · cites it 5× “Idaho Code § 19-101 provides, “No person can be punished for a public offense except upon a legal conviction in a court having jurisdiction thereof.”
State v. Cross, 670 P.2d 901 (Idaho 1983). · cites it 4× “If punishment is the goal, then I.C. § 19-101 is appropriate and a jail sentence or fine may be imposed; but an accused should not be enticed with the prospect of a withheld judgment, and then immediately sentenced to and obligated to serve jail time or to pay a fine.”
State v. Brandt, 715 P.2d 1011 (Idaho Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “2d 319, 324 (1978), another niche was carved out by a conclusion that, for purposes of I.C. § 19-101, which requires a conviction in a court having jurisdiction before punishment can be imposed, a conviction results when “a verdict or plea of guilty is accepted by the court.”
State v. Olsen (Idaho 2022). · cites it 8× “Additionally, Olsen’s desired interpretation of Idaho Code section 19-2601(3) presents issues and inconsistencies when read in conjunction with sections 19-101 and 18-8005, and Idaho Misdemeanor Criminal Rule 6(a)(3).”
State v. Olsen, 508 P.3d 1250 (Idaho 2022). · cites it 8× “Additionally, Olsen’s desired interpretation of Idaho Code section 19-2601(3) presents issues and inconsistencies when read in conjunction with sections 19-101 and 18-8005, and Idaho Misdemeanor Criminal Rule 6(a)(3).”
State v. Dakota Lee Villafuerte, 373 P.3d 695 (Idaho 2016). · cites it 4× “In order for there to be a public offense, the alleged conduct must be a criminal offense under Idaho law, State v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.