Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 19-1414 (2026)

Allegation as to time. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Allegation as to time. 

The precise time at which the offense was committed need not be stated in the indictment; but it may be alleged to have been committed at any time before the finding thereof, except where the time is a material ingredient in the offense.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1968–2013 · leading case: State v. Owens, 619 P.2d 787 (Idaho 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Owens, 619 P.2d 787 (Idaho 1980). · cites it 8× “With respect to defendant's claim that the time of the alleged offense was not stated in the information with adequate specificity, I.C. § 19-1414 provides that: "The precise time at which the offense was committed need not be stated in the indictment; but it may be alleged to…”
State v. Jones, 89 P.3d 881 (Idaho Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “Therefore, Jones has suffered *47 no prejudice from the manner in which the information pleaded the charges. Jones’s next argument, that the information was insufficient for failure to allege a specific time of the offenses, is also without merit.”
State v. Roberts, 610 P.2d 558 (Idaho 1980). · cites it 2× “I.C. § 19-1414 provides that “[t]he precise time at which the offense was committed need not be stated in the indictment; but it may be alleged to have been committed at any time before the finding thereof, except where the time is a material ingredient in the offense.”
State v. Oldham, 438 P.2d 275 (Idaho 1968). · cites it 2× “I.C. § 19-1414 states: “The precise time at which the offense was committed need not be stated in the indictment; but it may be alleged to have been committed at any time before the finding thereof, except where the time is a material ingredient in the offense.”
State v. Sydney Lorelei Neal, 314 P.3d 166 (Idaho 2013). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 19-1414. The statutory provisions relating to prosecutions on indictments apply to informations.”
State v. Taylor, 797 P.2d 158 (Idaho Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 4× “More specifically, Taylor argues that the amended information violates I.C. § 19-1414 because time became a material ingredient in the offense of sexual abuse of a minor under sixteen once he asserted his intent to rely on an alibi defense.”
State v. Coleman, 915 P.2d 28 (Idaho Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “See also I.C. § 19-1414; I.C.R. 7. Specifically, in child sexual abuse cases involving evidence of a number of secretive offenses over a period of time, detailed specificity in the information as to the times of the offenses is not required.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.