Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 22-1201 (2026)

Legislative intent.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Legislative intent.

It is in the best interest of all the people of the state of Idaho that the abundant natural resources of Idaho be protected, fully developed, and uniformly distributed. The potato industry is one of the agricultural industries that contributes to the economic welfare of the state. It is the purpose of this chapter to promote the public health and welfare of the citizens of the state by providing means for the protection, promotion, study, research, analysis and development of markets relating to the growing and promotion of Idaho potato products and byproducts.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1976–1999 · leading case: Idaho Potato Comm'n v. Washington Potato Comm'n, 410 F. Supp. 171 (D. Idaho 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Idaho Potato Comm'n v. Washington Potato Comm'n, 410 F. Supp. 171 (D. Idaho 1976). · cites it 4× “By virtue of Idaho Code § 22-1201 et seq., the I.P.C. stands in the place of and represents the interests of the State of Idaho in guarding against infringement of the trademark “Idaho”.”

Idaho Potato Comm'n v. Russet Valley Produce, Inc., 904 P.2d 566 (Idaho 1995). · cites it 8× “The Commission claimed it was entitled to costs and fees pursuant to I.C. § 22-1201 et seq., I.C. § 12-120, the Commission's regulations, and the license agreement with Russet Valley.”

Idaho Potato Comm'n v. M & M Produce Farms & Sales, 35 F. Supp. 2d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 1999). “” Idaho Code § 22-1201 . The power to tax and regulate an industry, Idaho Code §§ 22-1205 , 22-1207, are clearly traditional government functions.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.