Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 31-1506 (2026)

Judicial review of board decisions. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Judicial review of board decisions. 

(1) Unless otherwise provided by law, judicial review of any final act, order or proceeding of the board as provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, shall be initiated by any person aggrieved thereby within the same time and in the same manner as provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, for judicial review of actions.

(2)  Venue for judicial review of final board actions shall be in the district court of the county governed by the board.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1983–2024 · leading case: Giltner Dairy, LLC v. Jerome Cnty., 249 P.3d 358 (Idaho 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Giltner Dairy, LLC v. Jerome Cnty., 249 P.3d 358 (Idaho 2011). · cites it 80× “§ 31-1506 where LLUPA does not explicitly authorize judicial review? Idaho Code § 31-1506 , within the chapter entitled "County Finances and Claims Against County," states: (1) Unless otherwise provided by law, judicial review of any act, order or proceeding of the board shall…”
Gordon Ravenscroft v. Boise Cnty., 301 P.3d 271 (Idaho 2013). · cites it 51× “In response, the Board filed a motion to dismiss arguing that the district court was without jurisdiction to hear an appeal of a county personnel determination.”
Gibson v. Ada Cnty., 133 P.3d 1211 (Idaho 2006). · cites it 14× “Idaho Code § 31-1506 provides that a person is entitled to initiate judicial review of any “act, order or proceeding” of the Board and the merits of the subject matter would be subject to review and the IAPA standard of review would apply.”
St. Luke's Reg'l Med. Ctr., Ltd. v. Bd. of Commissioners, 203 P.3d 683 (Idaho 2009). · cites it 6× “The referenced statute, I.C. § 31-1506, provides: “Unless otherwise provided by law, judicial review of any act, order or proceeding of the board shall be initiated by any person aggrieved thereby within the same time and in the same manner as provided in chapter 52, title 67,…”
Bingham Cnty. Comm'n v. Interstate Elec. Co., 665 P.2d 1046 (Idaho 1983). · cites it 8× “See I.C. § 31-1506; I.C. § 31-1509; I.C. § 31-1513.”
St. Luke's Magic Valley Reg'l Med. Ctr., Ltd. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 237 P.3d 1210 (Idaho 2010). · cites it 8× “In turn, Idaho Code § 31-1506 provides that an applicant who is denied by the Board must seek judicial review of the Board's decision "within the same time and in the same manner as provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, for judicial review of actions.”
Gibson v. Ada Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 72 P.3d 845 (Idaho 2003). · cites it 4× “ACC § 1-7G-3(o) states that a party may “appeal the decision” of the hearing officer “to the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District.”
Saint Alphonsus Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Gooding Cnty., 356 P.3d 377 (Idaho 2015). · cites it 2× “Gooding County timely appealed to this Court. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW The Idaho Administrative Procedure Act governs this Court’s review of a county board of commissioners’s denial of an application for indigency benefits.”
Allen v. Blaine Cnty., 953 P.2d 578 (Idaho 1998). · cites it 2× “Under the IDAPA, “agency” is defined as “each state board, commission, department or officer authorized by law to make rules or to determine contested eases.” I.”
Sandpoint Indep. High. Dist. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 71 P.3d 1034 (Idaho 2003). · cites it 2× “STANDARD OF REVIEW Idaho Code section 31-1506 provides as follows: (1) Unless otherwise provided by law, judicial review of any act, order or proceeding of the board shall be initiated by any person aggrieved thereby within the same time and in the same manner as provided in…”
Hill v. Blaine Cnty. (Idaho 2024). · cites it 6× “Idaho Code section 31-1506 provides for judicial review of board decisions: Unless otherwise provided by law, judicial review of any final act, order or proceeding of the board as provided in chapter 52, title 67, Idaho Code, shall be initiated by any person aggrieved thereby…”
TCR, LLC v. Teton Cnty. (Idaho 2024). · cites it 4× “The County argues that our decision in Giltner indicates that the district court lacked authority to entertain the claims raised in this action.”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Idaho Code § 31-1506(1) — 7 cases
Gibson v. Ada Cnty., 133 P.3d 1211 (Idaho 2006). “Idaho Code § 31-1506 provides that a person is entitled to initiate judicial review of any “act, order or proceeding” of the Board and the merits of the subject matter would be subject to review and the IAPA standard of review would apply.”
Gibson v. Ada Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 72 P.3d 845 (Idaho 2003). “ACC § 1-7G-3(o) states that a party may “appeal the decision” of the hearing officer “to the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District.”
St. Luke's Reg'l Med. Ctr., Ltd. v. Bd. of Commissioners, 203 P.3d 683 (Idaho 2009). “The referenced statute, I.C. § 31-1506, provides: “Unless otherwise provided by law, judicial review of any act, order or proceeding of the board shall be initiated by any person aggrieved thereby within the same time and in the same manner as provided in chapter 52, title 67,…”
Gordon Ravenscroft v. Boise Cnty., 301 P.3d 271 (Idaho 2013). “In response, the Board filed a motion to dismiss arguing that the district court was without jurisdiction to hear an appeal of a county personnel determination.”
Allen v. Blaine Cnty., 953 P.2d 578 (Idaho 1998). “Under the IDAPA, “agency” is defined as “each state board, commission, department or officer authorized by law to make rules or to determine contested eases.” I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.