Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 49-2417 (2026)

Owner’s tort liability for negligence of another — Subrogation. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Owner’s tort liability for negligence of another — Subrogation. 

(1) Every owner of a motor vehicle is liable and responsible for the death of or injury to a person or property resulting from negligence in the operation of his motor vehicle, in the business of the owner or otherwise, by any person using or operating the vehicle with the permission, expressed or implied, of the owner, and the negligence of the person shall be imputed to the owner for all purposes of civil damages.

(2)  The liability of an owner for imputed negligence imposed by the provisions of this section and not arising through the relationship of principal and agent or master and servant is limited to the amounts set forth under "proof of financial responsibility" in section 49-117, Idaho Code, or the limits of the liability insurance maintained by the owner, whichever is greater.
(3)  In any action against an owner for imputed negligence as imposed by the provisions of this section the operator of the vehicle whose negligence is imputed to the owner shall be made a defendant party if personal service of process can be had upon that operator within Idaho. Upon recovery of a judgment, recourse shall first be had against the property of the operator so served.
(4)  In the event a recovery is had under the provisions of this section against an owner for imputed negligence the owner is subrogated to all the rights of the person injured and may recover from the operator the total amount of any judgment and costs recovered against the owner. If the bailee of an owner with the permission, expressed or implied, of the owner, permits another to operate the motor vehicle of the owner, then the bailee and the driver shall both be deemed operators of the vehicle of the owner, within the meaning of subsections (3) and (4) of this section.
(5)  Where two (2) or more persons are injured or killed in one (1) accident, the owner may settle or pay any bona fide claim for damages arising out of personal injuries or death, whether reduced to a judgment or not, and the payments shall diminish to the extent of the owners’ total liability on account of the accident. Payments so made, aggregating the full sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000), shall extinguish all liability of the owner hereunder to the claimants and all other persons on account of the accident. Liability may exist by reason of imputed negligence, pursuant to this section, and not arising through the negligence of the owner nor through the relationship of principal and agent nor master and servant.
(6)  If a motor vehicle is sold under a contract of conditional sale whereby the title to the motor vehicle remains in the vendor, the vendor or his assignee shall be deemed an owner within the provisions of this section.
(7)  An owner that rents or leases a motor vehicle to a person shall not be liable under the laws of the state of Idaho or a political subdivision thereof, by reason of being the owner of the vehicle, for harm to persons or property that results or arises out of the use, operation, or possession of the vehicle during the period of the rental or lease if:
(a)  The owner is engaged in the trade or business of renting or leasing motor vehicles; and
(b)  There is no negligence or criminal wrongdoing on the part of the owner.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1993–2014 · leading case: Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. v. Schrock, 252 P.3d 98 (Idaho 2011).
Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. v. Schrock, 252 P.3d 98 (Idaho 2011). · cites it 92× “However, as the owner of the vehicle Lisa Schrock would be liable for Christa's negligence under Idaho Code § 49-2417 (1). The fact that Christa, as a permissive driver, would not be covered does not mean that Lisa Schrock would not be covered for any claim made against her…”
Trevor Taft v. Jumbo Foods, Inc., 314 P.3d 193 (Idaho 2013). · cites it 16× “Idaho Code § 49-2417 (1) 3 “imputes a driver’s negligence to the owner of an automobile only when a ‘person using or operating the same with the permission, expressed or implied, of such owner,’ is driving.”
Elson v. Defren, 283 A.D.2d 109 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001). · cites it 5× “Idaho’s own vicarious liability statute, Idaho Code § 49-2417 , analogous to the vicarious liability provisions of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388, did not apply, Avis argued, because it is a statute of loss allocation, not conduct regulation, and New York will not apply another…”
Nava v. Rivas-del Toro, 264 P.3d 960 (Idaho 2011). · cites it 8× “” I.C. § 49-2417(1). Second, the amended complaint alleged that Cranney Farms knowingly permitted a vehicle in a dangerous condition to be operated on the public roadway.”
Oregon Mut. Ins. v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins., 218 P.3d 391 (Idaho 2009). · cites it 4× “Idaho Code § 49-2417 (1). Similarly, Oregon Mutual’s liability coverage under the policy in this case excludes “any person using a vehicle without a reasonable belief that the person is entitled to do so and that the person is using the vehicle within the scope of the permission…”
Stonewall Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Idaho, 971 P.2d 1142 (Idaho 1998). · cites it 4× “He sued MacDonald for negligent entrustment and vicarious liability pursuant to I.C. § 49-2417(1). Jacks sued Confluence and Domino's for vicarious liability, the negligent hiring of Oldham, and negligent company policy, i.”
Warren v. Furniss, 861 P.2d 1219 (Idaho Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “As such, their liability to plaintiff would be that imputed under I.C. § 49-2417(2), which is limited as provided in I.”
Roberts v. Bonneville Cnty., 873 P.2d 842 (Idaho 1994). · cites it 4× “§ 49-2417) Roberts argues that it was error for the trial court to rule at summary judgment and later instruct the jury that any negligence on the part of Schreiber, the driver of the truck, must be imputed to Roberts, the owner of the truck, pursuant to I.C. § 49-1404.”
McGrew v. Stone, 998 S.W.2d 5 (Ky. 1999). · cites it 2× “590(3) imposes joint and several liability on the owner of a motor vehicle for damages resulting from its negligent operation by a minor under the age of eighteen if the owner caused or permitted the minor to operate the vehicle.”
Stover v. Critchfield, 510 N.W.2d 681 (S.D. 1994). “”); Idaho Code § 49-2417 (Michie 1988) (stating in part that "Every owner of a motor vehicle is liable and responsible for the death of or injury to a person or property resulting from negligence in the operation of his motor vehicle .”
Tiegs v. Robertson, 236 P.3d 474 (Idaho Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “Denial of Summary Judgment Robertson contends that the district court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment on three grounds: (1) because Idaho Code § 49-2417 (1) cannot be read to apply to implements of husbandry; (2) that Robertson did not knowingly permit Kukla to…”
Hopkins v. McCallister (In re Bar GW Ranch & Trucking LLC), 520 B.R. 825 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2014). · cites it 2× “Idaho Code § 49-2417 provides that an "owner” of a motor vehicle "is liable and responsible for the death of or injury to a person or property resulting from negligence in the operation of his motor vehicle, in the business of the owner or otherwise, by any person using or…”
— Idaho Code § 49-2417(1) — 4 cases
Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. v. Schrock, 252 P.3d 98 (Idaho 2011). “However, as the owner of the vehicle Lisa Schrock would be liable for Christa's negligence under Idaho Code § 49-2417 (1). The fact that Christa, as a permissive driver, would not be covered does not mean that Lisa Schrock would not be covered for any claim made against her…”
Nava v. Rivas-del Toro, 264 P.3d 960 (Idaho 2011). “” I.C. § 49-2417(1). Second, the amended complaint alleged that Cranney Farms knowingly permitted a vehicle in a dangerous condition to be operated on the public roadway.”
Trevor Taft v. Jumbo Foods, Inc., 314 P.3d 193 (Idaho 2013). “Idaho Code § 49-2417 (1) 3 “imputes a driver’s negligence to the owner of an automobile only when a ‘person using or operating the same with the permission, expressed or implied, of such owner,’ is driving.”
Stonewall Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Idaho, 971 P.2d 1142 (Idaho 1998). “He sued MacDonald for negligent entrustment and vicarious liability pursuant to I.C. § 49-2417(1). Jacks sued Confluence and Domino's for vicarious liability, the negligent hiring of Oldham, and negligent company policy, i.”
— Idaho Code § 49-2417(2) — 2 cases
Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. v. Schrock, 252 P.3d 98 (Idaho 2011). “However, as the owner of the vehicle Lisa Schrock would be liable for Christa's negligence under Idaho Code § 49-2417 (1). The fact that Christa, as a permissive driver, would not be covered does not mean that Lisa Schrock would not be covered for any claim made against her…”
Warren v. Furniss, 861 P.2d 1219 (Idaho Ct. App. 1993). “As such, their liability to plaintiff would be that imputed under I.C. § 49-2417(2), which is limited as provided in I.”
— Idaho Code § 49-2417(l) — 1 case
Nava v. Rivas-del Toro, 264 P.3d 960 (Idaho 2011). “” I.C. § 49-2417(1). Second, the amended complaint alleged that Cranney Farms knowingly permitted a vehicle in a dangerous condition to be operated on the public roadway.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.