Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 54-1801 (2026)
Short title.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Short title.
This chapter may be cited as the "Medical Practice Act."
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1985–2013 · leading case: Hall v. Rocky Mtn Emergency Physicians, 312 P.3d 313 (Idaho 2013).
Hall v. Rocky Mtn Emergency Physicians, 312 P.3d 313 (Idaho 2013). “Likewise, the authority granted to the Board of Medicine by the Medical Practice Act, I.C. §§ 54-1801 to 54-1821 permits that body to establish a minimum statewide standard of care by adoption of this Rule.”
Maxfield v. State, 700 P.2d 115 (Idaho Ct. App. 1985). “Fourth, he argues that the Idaho Medical Practice Act, I.C. § 54-1801 et seq., is unconstitutional on its face and as it is applied to naturopathic physicians.”
Dopp v. Idaho Comm'n of Pardons & Parole, 84 P.3d 593 (Idaho Ct. App. 2004). “See I.C. §§ 54-1801 to 54-1840, 54-2301 to 54-2315.”
Woodfield v. Bd. of Prof'l Discipline of the Idaho State Bd. of Med., 905 P.2d 1047 (Idaho Ct. App. 1995). “An investigation was conducted, resulting in commencement of disciplinary proceedings before the Board of Professional Discipline under the Idaho Medical Practice Act, I.C. §§ 54-1801 to -1819. A twelve count “complaint” filed with the Board by its Executive Director against Dr.”
Noak v. Idaho Dep't of Corr., 271 P.3d 703 (Idaho 2012). “199, 536 (repealing predecessor to Medical Practice Act and enacting the statutes now codified as I.C. § 54-1801 et seq.) But because "the legislature undertook an extensive rewriting of the” Medical Practice Act, and left untouched I.”
Olsen v. Idaho State Bd. of Med., 363 F.3d 916 (9th Cir. 2004). “See Idaho Code §§ 54-1801 , et seq.; Idaho Code §§ 67-5201 , et seq.”
John F. Noak, M.D. v. Dept of Corr. & Prison Health Servs., Inc. (Idaho 2012). “199, 536 (repealing predecessor to Medical Practice Act and enacting the statutes now codified as I.C. § 54-1801 et seq.) But because “the legislature undertook an extensive rewriting of the” Medical Practice Act, and left untouched I.”
Hall v. Rocky Mtn Emergency Physicians (Idaho 2013). “Likewise, the authority granted to the Board of Medicine by the Medical Practice Act, I.C. §§ 54-1801 to 54-1821 permits that body to establish a minimum statewide standard of care by adoption of this Rule.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.