Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 67-6501 (2026)

Short title. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Short title. 

This act shall be known as the "Local Land Use Planning Act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 49 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case: Dawson Enter., Inc. v. Blaine Cnty., 567 P.2d 1257 (Idaho 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dawson Enter., Inc. v. Blaine Cnty., 567 P.2d 1257 (Idaho 1977). · cites it 16× “However, because legislation enacted after this suit was initiated (The Local Planning Act of 1975, I.C. §§ 67-6501 et seq. ) may well have compelled the county to adopt a comprehensive plan which may validate Blaine County's zoning ordinance, I would remand to the district…”
Gumprecht v. City of Coeur D'Alene, 661 P.2d 1214 (Idaho 1983). · cites it 12× “See I.C. §§ 67-6501 et seq.; 1975 Idaho Sess.”
Cooper v. Bd. of Cnty. Com'rs of Ada Cnty., 614 P.2d 947 (Idaho 1980). · cites it 6× “Because the board failed to provide notice of its second meeting regarding appellants' application; because no transcribable verbatim record of the proceedings was kept; and because the board failed to make specific written findings of fact and conclusions upon which its…”
William v. Cenarrusa, 682 P.2d 524 (Idaho 1984). · cites it 4× “(I.C. § 67-6501 — Local Planning Act of 1975) "13.”
Johnson v. Blaine Cnty., 204 P.3d 1127 (Idaho 2009). · cites it 4× “ANALYSIS In order to obtain judicial review of final action under the Local Land Use Plan *920 ning Act (LLUPA), I.C. §§ 67-6501 et seq., there must be a statute granting the right of judicial review.”
South Fork Coalition v. Bd. of Commissioners, 730 P.2d 1009 (Idaho 1986). · cites it 8× “We find nothing within the Local Planning Act, I.C. §§ 67-6501 et seq., or the Bonneville County zoning ordinance to require such a consideration of all the land owned by the applicant beyond and above that contained in the application for the PUD.”
Ralph Naylor Farms, LLC v. Latah Cnty., 172 P.3d 1081 (Idaho 2007). · cites it 4× “Nothing in the Local Land Use Planning Act (I.C. §§ 67-6501, et. seq.) provides counties or cities the authority to regulate water quantity issues.”
Burns Holdings, LLC v. Madison Cnty. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 214 P.3d 646 (Idaho 2009). · cites it 4× “Burns argues that the Local Land Use Planning Act (LLUPA), I.C. §§ 67-6501 et seq., permits judicial review of the Board's decision under the IAPA.”
Jasso v. Camas Cnty., 264 P.3d 897 (Idaho 2011). · cites it 2× “STANDARD OF REVIEW Under the Local Land Use Planning Act, I.C. §§ 67-6501 et seq., one who is adversely affected by “[t]he approval, denial, or failure to act upon an application for a subdivision .”
KMST, LLC. v. Cnty. of Ada, 67 P.3d 56 (Idaho 2003). · cites it 2× “That authority was vested in the Ada County Commissioners under the Local Land Use Planning Act, Idaho Code §§ 67-6501 et seq. (2001). Although the Ada County Commissioners could certainly require approval of other governmental entities regarding the proposed development,…”
Gooding Cnty. v. Wybenga, 46 P.3d 18 (Idaho 2002). · cites it 2× “The Ethics in Government Act is a general statute applying to elected, appointed, and employed public officials at the state, county, and municipal levels of government.”
Walker-Schmidt Ranch v. Blaine Cnty., 614 P.2d 960 (Idaho 1980). · cites it 4× “The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court with order to remand to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings in accordance with I.C. § 67-6501 et seq. and this opinion. Our disposition of this matter makes…”
Show all 49 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.