Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 67-8201 (2026)
Short title.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Short title.
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Idaho Development Impact Fee Act."
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1995–2026 · leading case: KMST, LLC. v. Cnty. of Ada, 67 P.3d 56 (Idaho 2003).
KMST, LLC. v. Cnty. of Ada, 67 P.3d 56 (Idaho 2003). “Did the imposition of the impact fees constitute a taking? Pursuant to the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, Idaho Code §§ 67-8201 et seq. (2001), the ACHD imposed an impact fee upon KMST totaling $99,127.”
Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of Coeur D'Alene, 890 P.2d 326 (Idaho 1995). “The IBCA filed an action on behalf of its members, and moved for summary judgment based on the assertion that the Idaho Development Impact Fee Act (I.C. §§ 67-8201 to -8216) does not apply to the City, and therefore there is no statute empowering the City to collect the impact…”
Buckskin Props., Inc. v. Valley Cnty., 300 P.3d 18 (Idaho 2013). “" The Idaho Development Impact Fee Act, I.C. § 67-8201 to 8216, provides requirements that governmental entities must follow in order to impose impact fees.”
Karen White v. Valley Cnty., 320 P.3d 1236 (Idaho 2014). “Idaho Code § 67-8201 et seq. IDIFA prohibits certain impact fees unless they are imposed pursuant to an ordinance in compliance with the statute.”
Doyle v. The Harris Ranch Cmty. Infrastructure Dist. No. 1 (Idaho 2026). “As a result, we agree with the District and the Developer that reading other definitions from the Impact Fee Act into the CID Act that were not expressly included in the CID Act is not appropriate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.